Address: Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk 163002 Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov, office 1425

Phone / Fax: 8(81-82)21-61-18

Lesnoy Zhurnal

Typification of Forest Areas by Natural-Production Conditions Based on Cluster Analysis

Версия для печати

I.R. Shegelman, P.V. Budnik

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.6MB )






The effectiveness of harvesting machines, their reliability, and the level of negative environmental impact depends on the degree of adaptation of the equipment to natural-production conditions (NPC). To choose the equipment it is necessary to allocate groups of areas with close NPC. The purpose of the study is to form methodological tools for forest industry typification of forest areas by NPC. It is proposed to carry out the typification of forest areas based on cluster analysis. For this purpose, a methodology has been developed, including: setting the goal of typing areas by NPC; data collection on NPC; conducting cluster analysis; decision making on typification of areas by NPC. The task of cluster analysis is to divide, on the basis of a certain set of data, the set of forest areas into groups with similar NPCs. It is proposed to use Euclidean distances as a measure of belonging to one of the groups, and to determine the data set by indicators describing the NPC. The proposed methodology has been tested on the example of the European North of Russia (ENR). The study showed that three zones can be distinguished in ENR: zone A, including the Murmansk region; zone B, including the Republic of Karelia, the Republic of Komi and the Arkhangelsk region; zone C, including the Vologda region. Additionally, two subzones are distinguished in zone B: the West Karelian Upland and the territories belonging to the Northern, Subpolar and Polar Urals. The proposed methodology allows to increase the degree of formalization and convenience of the typification process of forest areas by NPC, to take into account a wide range of various aspects of natural-production conditions, their probabilistic nature, as well as to flexibly carry out the typification of areas for specific purposes. The research results may be applicable in solving problems of searching for effective technologies and rational parameters of logging machine systems.


Ilya R. Shegelman, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: P-9793-2019,
Pavel V. Budnik, Candidate of Engineering, Head of the Department of Intellectual Property and Invention Protection; ResearcherID: E-1782-2015,


Petrozavodsk State University, prosp. Lenina, 33, Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, 185910, Russian Federation; e-mail:


typification of forest areas, natural-production conditions, logging operations, cluster analysis

For citation

Shegelman I.R., Budnik P.V. Typification of Forest Areas by Natural-Production Conditions Based on Cluster Analysis. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2021, no. 1, pp. 120–137. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-1-120-137


1. Vapnik V.N., Chervonenkis A.Ya. Theory of Pattern Recognition: Theoretical Problems of Learning. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1974. 416 p.
2. Vasiliev A.A., Frumin I.L. Evaluation of Agro Mival for Potatoes Using Cluster Analysis. Permskii Agrarnyi Vestnik [Perm Agrarian Journal], 2016, no. 2(14), pp. 16–22.
3. Vinogorov G.K. To the Methodology of Justification of Settlement Trees When Solving Forest Exploitation Problems. Trudy TsNIIME, 1972, no. 122, pp. 52–64.
4. Gitis L.Kh. Statistical Classification and Cluster Analysis: Monograph, Moscow, MSМИ Publ., 2003. 157 p.
5. Zinchuk G.M., Yashkin A.V. Cluster Analysis of Agrarian Territories in the Central Federal District. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravleniye [Bulletin Tver State University. Series: Economics and Management], 2016, no. 4, pp. 143–149.
6. Igoshin A.N., Cheryomukhin A.D. Cluster Analysis of the Grain Sector in the Region. Vestnik NGIEI [Vestnik NGIEI], 2015, no. 7(50), pp. 21–29.
7. Kazakov N.V., Ryabukhin P.B., Sadetdinov M.A. The Method of the Forest Stock Typification. Vestnik KrasGAU [The Bulletin of KrasGAU], 2013, no. 10, pp. 157–161.
8. Lapteva E.V. Statistical Analysis and Forecasting of Population Incomes in Russian Federation. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii [Intellect. Innovation. Investments], 2016, no. 12, pp. 64–69.
9. Lyumanov R. Machine Forest Felling. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1990. 280 p.
10. Obydyonnikov V.I., Kozhukhov N.I., Korotkov S.A. Domestic Forest Typology Current Issues. Lesnoy vestnik [Forestry Bulletin], 2019, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 5–11. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2019-2-5-11
11. Ryabukhin P.B., Cozakov N.V., Burlov A.N. Method of Timber Industry Typification of Cutting Areas According to Natural and Industrial Conditions (Spruce Forest of Far East Federal District as an Example). Sistemy. Metody. Tekhnologii [Sistemy. Methods. Technologies], 2010, no. 2(6), pp. 52–57.
12. Ryabchenko N.A., Katermina V.V., Gnedash A.A., Malysheva O.P. Political Content of Social Movements in the Online Space of Modern States: Methodology of the Analysis and Research Practices. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk [South Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 2018, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 139–162. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-19-3-139-162
13. Typification of the Natural-Production Conditions of Logging Areas: Recommendations. Khimki, TsNIIME Publ., 1986. 23 p.
14. Farber S.K., Kuz’mik N.S. Forest Typology: Theory and Prospects for Use in Siberian Forests. Hvojnye boreal’noj zony [Conifers of the boreal area], 2013, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 143–148.
15. Feklistova I.S. Using Cluster Analysis for the Estimation of Efficiency of Strategic Management of the Region Enterprises. Traektoria nauki [Path of Science], 2016, no. 2(7). Режим доступа: (дата обращения: 06.08.19).
16. Filipova A.G., Eskova A.V., Inzartsev A.V. Social Potential of a Region: Experience of Using Cluster Analysis. Regionologiya [Regionology], 2017, no. 3(100), pp. 438–455.
17. Khromushin V.A., Eskov V.M., Khetagurova A.K. Innovative Methods of Analyzing, Processing and Information Management in Health System. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy [Journal of New Medical Technologies], 2016, no. 1, pp. 15–21. DOI: 10.12737/18446 Режим доступа: (дата обращения: 06.08.19). 
18. Shegelman I.R., Budnik P.V., Baklagin V.N. Minimization of Technogenic Effects of Forest Machines on Forest Ecosystems Based on the Clustering of Natural-Production Conditions for Forestry. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [Advances in current natural sciences], 2018, no. 11 (part 1), pp. 72–78. DOI: 10.17513/use.36908
19. Shchemeleva I.I. Social Activity of the Student Youth: Factor and Cluster Analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2019, no. 4, pp. 133–141. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004594-6
20. Ackerman P.A., Williams C., Ackerman S., Nathi C. Diesel Consumption and Carbon Balance in South African Pine Clear-Felling CTL Operations: A Preliminary Case Study. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 2017, no. 38, iss. 1, pp. 65–72.
21. Alam M., Walsh D., Strandgard M., Brown M. A Log-by-Log Productivity Analysis of Two Valmet 475EX Harvesters. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 2014, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 14–22. DOI: 10.1080/14942119.2014.891668
22. Bergroth J., Palander T., Kärhä K. Excavator-Based Harvesters in Wood Cutting Operations in Finland. Forestry Studies, 2006, vol. 45, pp. 74–88.
23. Castro G.P., Nutto L., Malinovski J.R., Malinovski R.A. Harvesting Systems. Tropical Forestry Handbook. Berlin, Springer, 2016, pp. 2445–2485. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3_184
24. Häggström C., Lindroos O. Human, Technology, Organization and Environment – a Human Factors Perspective on Performance in Forest Harvesting. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 2016, vol. 27, iss. 2, pp. 67–78. DOI: 10.1080/14942119.2016.1170495
25. Jiroušek R., Klvač R., Skoupý A. Productivity and Costs of the Mechanised Cutto-Length Wood Harvesting System in Clear-Felling Operations. Journal of Forest Science, 2007, vol. 53, iss. 10, pp. 476–482. DOI: 10.17221/2088-JFS
26. Kärhä K., Rönkkö E., Gumse S.-I. Productivity and Cutting Costs of Thinning Harvesters. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 2004, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 43–56. DOI: 10.1080/14942119.2004.10702496
27. Kellogg L.D., Bettinger P. Thinning Productivity and Cost for Mechanized Cut-to-Length System in the Northwest Pacific Coast Region of the USA. Journal of Forest Engineering, 1994, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 43–52. DOI: 10.1080/08435243.1994.10702659
28. Klaes B., Struck J., Schneider R., Schüler G. Middle-Term Effects after Timber Harvesting with Heavy Machinery on a Fine-Textured Forest Soil. European Journal of Forest Research, 2016, vol. 135, iss. 6, pp. 1083–1095. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-016-0995-2
29. Kormanek M., Baj D. Analysis of Operation Performance in the Process of Machine Wood Harvesting with FAO FAR 6840 Mini-Harvester. Agricultural Engineering, 2018, vol. 22, iss. 1, pp. 73–82. DOI: 10.1515/agriceng-2018-0007
30. Laitila J., Väätäinen K. The Cutting Productivity in Integrated Harvesting of Pulpwood and Delimbed Energy Wood with a Forestry-Equipped Peat Harvesting Tractor. Suo, 2013, vol. 64(2-3), pp. 97–112.
31. McNeel J.F., Rutherford D. Modeling Harvester-Forwarder System Performance in a Selection Harvest. Journal of Forest Engineering, 1994, vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 7–14. DOI: 10.1080/08435243.1994.10702661
32. Nurminen T., Korpunen H., Uusitalo J. Time Consumption Analysis of the Mechanized Cut-to-Length Harvesting System. Silva Fennica, 2006, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 335–363. DOI: 10.14214/sf.346
33. Ovaskainen H. Comparison of Harvester Work in Forest and Simulator Environments. Silva Fennica, 2005, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 89–101. DOI: 10.14214/sf.398
34. Palander T., Bergroth J., Kärhä K. Excavator Technology for Increasing the Efficiency of Energy Wood and Pulp Wood Harvesting. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, vol. 40, pp. 120–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.010
35. Pētersons J. Productivity of Harvesters in Commercial Thinnings in the Forest Stands of Different Composition of Species. Research for Rural Development, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 76–82.
36. Proto A.R., Macrì G., Visser R., Russo D., Zimbalatti G. Factors Affecting Forwarder Productivity. European Journal of Forest Research, 2018, vol. 137, iss. 2, pp. 143–151. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-017-1088-6
37. Rozītis A., Zimelis A., Lazdiņš А. Evaluation of Productivity and Impact on Soil of Tracked ProSilva F2/2 Forwarder in Forest Thinning. Research for Rural Development, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 94–100. DOI: 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.014
38. Schack-Kirchner H., Fenner P.T., Hildebrand E.E. Different Responses in Bulk Density and Saturated Conductivity to Soil Deformation by Logging Machinery on a Ferralsol under Native Forest. Soil Use and Management, 2007, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 286–293. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00096.x
39. Strandgard M., Mitchell R., Acuna M. Time Consumption and Productivity of a Forwarder Operating on a Slope in a Cut-to-Length Harvest System in a Pinus radiata D. Don Pine Plantation. Journal of Forest Science, 1972, vol. 63, iss. 7, pp. 324–330. DOI: 10.17221/10/2017-JFS
40. Syunev V., Sokolov A., Konovalov A., Katarov V., Seliverstov A., Gerasimov Y., Karvinen S., Välkky E. Comparison of Wood Harvesting Methods in the Republic of Karelia. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 120. Joensuu, MELTA, 2009. 117 p. Available at: (accessed 04.09.19)
41. Tiernan D., Zeleke G., Owende P.M.O., Kanali C.L., Lyons J., Ward S.M. Effect of Working Conditions on Forwarder Productivity in Cut-to-Length Timber Harvesting on Sensitive Forest Sites in Ireland. Biosystems Engineering, 2004, vol. 87, iss. 2, pp. 167–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2003.11.009
42. Tufts R.A. Productivity and Cost of the Ponsse 15-Series, Cut-to-Length Harvesting System in Southern Pine Plantations. Forest Products Journal, 1997, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 39–46.

Typification of Forest Areas by Natural-Production Conditions Based on Cluster Analysis


Electronic submission of articles