Silvicultural Assessment of Measures to Preserve Key Biotopes in Clear-Cut Areas in the Vologda Region. P. 78–89

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.8MB )

UDС

630*2

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2026-1-78-89

Abstract

Clear-cutting leads to changes in the structure of biogeocenoses, the age and species composition of stands, and the diversity and abundance of vegetation. The article examines the results of a silvicultural and economic assessment of measures to preserve key biotopes with excessive soil moisture during clear-cutting carried out using cut-tolength and tree-length timber harvesting technologies in the Vologda Region. The results of the assessment of stand stability and floristic diversity in key biotopes have been analyzed, and the necessity and parameters for establishing protective zones have been substantiated. Monitoring observations show that the key biotopes identified during logging have been preserved within the boundaries. In key biotopes, rare and extrazonal plant species have not lost their viability. When assessing the diversity of flora, it should be noted that the number of species in biotopes with temporary excess moisture is, on average, 1.5 times higher than the number of species in adjacent stands before logging and 1.8 times higher than the number of species in stands in adjacent cuttings (1–7 years after cutting). In biotopes with constant excessive moisture, this indicator is 1.7 and 1.8 times higher, respectively. When clear-cutting is carried out using cut-to-length and tree-length timber harvesting technologies with and without preservation of key biotopes, the profitability of logging operations does not differ significantly. The feasibility of tree-length timber harvesting is 19.9 % higher than that of the cut-to-length technology, which is due to the lower cost of work. From a silvicultural and environmental perspective, the abandonment of key biotopes in the development of logging areas is an effective measure aimed at maintaining biological diversity at the local level. From an economic point of view, the preservation of key biotopes during clear-cutting is desirable and makes it possible to reduce production costs for logging operations by leaving non-operational areas with low-quality timber.

Authors

Oleg A. Konyushatov, Candidate of Agriculture, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: JEZ-9194-2023,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9819-4219
Sergey A. Korchagov*, Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: HLQ-4954-2023,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-9550
Dmitry V. Belyakov, Candidate of Agriculture; ResearcherID: AAX-2399-2021,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-1492

Affiliation

Northern Research Institute of Forestry – Vologda Regional Laboratory, ul. Gor’kogo, 83 a, Vologda, 160016, Russian Federation; konyushatov_oa@sevniilh-arh.ru, korchagov@sevniilh-arh.ru*, belyakovdima09111995@yandex.ru

Keywords

biological diversity, clear-cutting, key biotope, biotope core, biotope buffer zone, sustainability of the stands, silvicultural and economic efficiency

For citation

Konyushatov O.A., Korchagov S.A., Belyakov D.V. Silvicultural Assessment of Measures to Preserve Key Biotopes in Clear-Cut Areas in the Vologda Region. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2026, no. 1, pp. 78–89. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2026-1-78-89

References

1. Agafonov V.B. Legal Issues of Environmental Protection and Ensuring Environmental Safety in the Use of Subsoil Resources. Legal Regulation of the Use of Natural Resources. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2015, pp. 141–144. (In Russ.).
2. Andreeva S.V., Bublichenko A.G., Bublichenko Yu.N., Zagidullina A.T., Glushkovskaya N.B., Knieze A.A., Kotkova V.M., Kushnevskaya E.V., Mosyagina E.V., Nosova E.A., Rozhdestvenskij S.Yu. The Results on Research of Biological Diversity in the Territory of the Pskov Model Forest. St. Petersburg, 2010. 112 p. (In Russ.).
3. Astrologova L.E., Gortinskij G.B. Guidelines for Conducting Field Practice in Botany. Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelsk Forestry Engineering Institute, 1980. 32 p. (In Russ.).
4. Belyakov D.V. Silvicultural Assessment of Measures to Preserve Biological Diversity in Clear-Cut Areas in the Taiga Zone (Using the Vologda Region as an Example): Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Arkhangelsk, 2024. 20 p. (In Russ.).
5. Bogolyubov A.S. The Simplest Methods of Statistical Processing of Environmental Research Results. Moscow, Ekosistema Publ., 1998. 13 p. (In Russ.).
6. Gromtsev A.N. Fundamentals of Landscape Ecology of European Taiga Forests of Russia. Petrozavodsk, Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2008. 268 p. (In Russ.).
7. Gusev I.I. Ecosystem Modelling. Arkhangelsk, ASTU Publ., 2002. 112 p. (In Russ.).
8. Danchenko M.A. Economics of Natural Complexes. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2009. 120 p. (In Russ.).
9. Il’ina O., Karpachevskij M., Yanitskaya T. The Regulatory Framework for Biodiversity Conservation during Timber Harvesting and Recommendations for its Application. Moscow, 2009. 36 p. (In Russ.).
10. Karpachevskij M.L., Teplyakov V.K., Yanitskaya T.O., Yaroshenko A.Yu., Bryukhanov A.V., Bukvareva E.N., Konyushatov O.A., Korchagov S.A., Kulyasova A.A., Petrov A.P., Raj E.A. Fundamentals of Sustainable Forest Management: 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow, 2014. 266 p. (In Russ.).
11. Konyushatov O.A., Korchagov S.A., Gribov S.E., Belyakov D.V. Regulatory Framework in the Field of Conservation of Biological Diversity in Forest Management. Aktual’nye voprosy taezhnogo i pritundrovogo lesovodstva na Evropejskom Severe Rossii: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference. Arkhangelsk, Northern Research Institute of Forestry, 2023, pp. 337–344. (In Russ.).
12. Коrlyakov K.A. The Main Provisions of the Theory of Ecotonic Ecosystems. Vestnik soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoj oblasti, 2019, vol. 1, no. 4 (27), pp. 3–10. (In Russ.).
13. Korchagov S.A., Babich N.A., Lupanova I.N. Improving the Efficiency of Forest Management in the Taiga Zone of European Russia: Monograph. Vologda, Molochnoe Village, Vologda Region: Vologda State Dairy Farming Academy named after N.V. Vereshchagin, 2018. 129 p. (In Russ.).
14. The Red Book of the Vologda Region. Vol. 2: Plants and Mushrooms. Eds.-in-chief G.Yu. Konechnaya, T.A. Suslova. Vologda, Vologda State Pedagogical University Publ., Rus’ Publ., 2004. 360 p. (In Russ.).
15. Forest Inventory Handbook for the North-East of the European Part of the Russian Federation: Regulatory Materials for the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Arkhangelsk, Vologda Regions and the Komi Republic. Arkhangelsk, Pravda Severa Publ., 2012. 672 p. (In Russ.).
16. Nakvasina E.N., Seryj V.S., Semenov B.A. Field Practicum on Soil Science. Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelsk State University Publ., 2007. 126 p. (In Russ.).
17. Orlova N.I. The Identificator of Higher Plants of the Vologda Region. Vologda, Vologda State Pedagogical University Publ., Rus’ Publ., 1997. 264 p. (In Russ.).
18. Tikhodeeva M.Yu., Lebedeva V.Kh. Practical Geobotany (Analysis of the Composition of Plant Communities): Textbook. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2015. 166 p. (In Russ.).
19. Shaikhutdinova A.A. Methods of Biodiversity Assessment: Methodological Guidelines. Orenburg, Orenburg State University Publ., 2019. 37 p. (In Russ.).
20. Shimova O.S., Lopachuk O.N., Bajchorov V.M. Economic Efficiency of Measures for the Conservation of Biological Diversity. Belarus, Minsk, Navuka Publ., 2010. 123 p. (In Russ.).
21. Hämäläinen K., Tahvanainen T., Junninen K. Characteristics of Boreal and Hemiboreal Herb-Rich Forests as Habitats for Polypore Fungi. Silva Fennica, 2018, vol. 52, no. 5, art. no. 10001. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10001
22. Hansson L. Key Habitats in Swedish Managed Forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2001, vol. 16, supp. no. 003, pp. 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/028275801300090609
23. Nirhamo A., Pykälä J., Jääskeläinen K., Kouki J. Habitat Associations of Red-Listed Epiphytic Lichens in Finland. Silva Fennica, 2023, vol. 57, no. 1, art. no. 22019. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.22019
24. Oldén A., Selonen V.A.O., Lehkonen E., Kotiaho J.S. The Effect of Buffer Strip Width and Selective Logging on Streamside Plant Communities. BMC Ecology, 2019, vol. 19, art. no. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0225-0
25. Ring E., Johansson F., Brömssen von C., Bergkvist I. A Snapshot of Forest Buffers near Streams, Ditches, and Lakes on Forest Land in Sweden – Lessons Learned. Silva Fennica, 2022, vol. 56, no. 4, art. no. 10676. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10676
26. Rydgren B., Kyläkorpi L., Bodlund B., Ellegård A., Grusell E., Miliander S. Experiences from Five Years of Using the Biotope Method, a Tool for Quantitative Biodiversity Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2005, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765760
27. Sverdrup-Thygeson A. Key Habitats in the Norwegian Production Forest: A Case Study. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2002, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/028275802753626818