Morphometric Criteria for Assessing the Containerized Conifers Seedlings Quality. P. 42–57

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.6MB )

UDС

582.47:630*32:630*411:630*164

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2023-5-42-57

Abstract

The quality of planted forest crops depends significantly on the qualities of the planting stock. Numerous studies have been carried out to find clear seedling quality criteria and work out methods for their quantitative assessment to optimize the cultivation regime. Indicators of planting stock that are available for measurement under nursery conditions are needed to predict the success of forest crop establishment. This paper provides a review of the studies that applied different morphological criteria to evaluate coniferous planting stock quality and different determination methods. The suitability of planting stock quality indicators is determined by the effectiveness of predicting the outplanting survival rate (%) and growth. The key morphometric attributes of planting stock are the linear dimensions and biomass of whole seedlings and their individual organs: root collar diameter (RCD), seedling height (SH), dry mass of needles (NDM), stem (SBDM), roots (RDM), shoot/aboveground part of the seedling (SDM), seedling’s total dry matter (TDM), number of needles (NN). Effective indicators of seedling quality are morphometric indicators of roots: total length (TRL), volume (TRV), dry mass (RDM), number of first- (FOLR N), second- (SOLR N), and third-order (TOLR N) lateral roots, root surface area (TRS). TRL is a fairly reliable indicator of absorbent surface area. To minimize errors in the use of one or two traits, integrated seedling quality indices based on two or more indices have been developed. Widely used indices include: SQ = SH(cm)/RCD(mm); SDM/RDM ratio; Dickson quality index DQI = TDM/ ((SH / RCD) + (SDM / RDM)). RCD was the most suitable parameter to indicate seedling quality for many species due to its higher correlation level with the Dickson quality index. The SH index proved to be an effective indicator for analysis only when used together with RCD. When studying the formation of frost resistance, a number of morphological parameters are used: initiation of needle primordia, size of primordial shoots, cell volume, mitotic index (MI) of terminal primordia. Despite advances in testing planting stock quality and predicting field performance, not a single test is universally applicable for all woody plant species and environmental conditions. According to the target seedling concept, the application of morphometric criteria for assessing seedling quality in forest nurseries is a prerequisite for predicting outplanting success and maximizing the predictability of the outcomes of highproductivity forest crop planting.

Authors

Elena V. Robonen¹, Research Scientist; ResearcherID: AAD-1958-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7926-8672
Nadezhda P. Chernobrovkina^1*, Doctor of Biology, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: K-6120-2018, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9716-003X
Anastasiya V. Egorova¹, Candidate of Agriculture; ResearcherID: K-6095-2018, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-1269
Maria I. Zaitseva², Candidate of Engineering; ResearcherID: P-2238-2015, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4209-2815
Karina G. Nelaeva¹, Postgraduate Student; ResearcherID: GYJ-7223-2022, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-4451

Affiliation

¹Forest Research Institute of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkinskaya St., 11, Petrozavodsk, 185910, Russian Federation; er51@bk.ru, chernobrovkina50@bk.ru*, egorova.anast@mail.ru, nelaevakg@krc.karelia.ru
²Petrozavodsk State University, Lenin Ave., 33, Petrozavodsk, 185910, Russian Federation; 2003bk@bk.ru

Keywords

conifers, Pinus, seedlings, planting stock, morphometric attributes, Dickson quality index

For citation

Robonen E.V., Chernobrovkina N.P., Egorova A.V., Zaitseva M.I., Nelaeva K.G. Morphometric Criteria for Assessing the Containerized Conifers Seedlings Quality. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 5, pp. 42–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-5-42-57

References

1. Barannik A.B. Forestry Efficiency of Creating Spruce Crops with Enlarged Seedlings in the Taiga Zone. Lesnoe hozyajstvo = Forestry, 1978, no. 4, pp. 47–53. (In Russ.).

2. Bobushkina S.V. Efficiency Production Methods of Conifers Ball-rooted Planting Stock in Arkhangelsk Region. Lesnoy vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2021, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 45–54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18698/2542-1468-2021-6-45-54

3. Gan P.A. Influence of Age and Height of Planting Material on the Condition of Tianshan Spruce Crops. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 1982, no. 4. pp. 82–85. (In Russ.).

4. Gof A.A. Efficiency of Creation of Scots Pine Forest Plantations by Seedlings with a Closed Root System in Ribbon Forests of the Altai Mountains: Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Yekaterinburg, 2020. 18 p. (In Russ.).

5. Egorova A.V., Chernobrovkina N.P., Robonen E.V. Effects of Application of a Conifer-derived Chemical on the Growth and Elemental Composition of Pinus sylvestris L. Seedlings under Forest Nursery Conditions. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya = Chemistry of Plant Materials, 2017, no. 2, pp. 171–180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.2017021720

6. Egorova A.V., Chernobrovkina N.P., Robonen E.V., Zaytseva M.I. Method of Preparation of Aqueous Extracts from Goat Willow Leaves taking into account the Daily Dynamics of their Biological Activity to Increase the Germination of Common Pine Seeds. Fiziologiya rastenij = Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2019, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 394–400. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015330319040031

7. Zhigunov A.V. Theory and Practice of Growing Planting Material with a Closed Root System. Saint-Petersburg, SPbSRIF Publ., 2000. 293 p. (In Russ.).

8. Zhigunov A.V., Danilov D.A., Shestakova T.A., Neverovsky V.J. Influence of the Type of Planting Material on the Growth of Spruce and Pine Plantations on Post-agrogenic Lands of the North-West of Russia. Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Les. Ekologiya. Prirodopol'zovanie = Bulletin of the Volga State Technological University. Forest. Ecology. Nature management, 2016, no. 3(31), pp. 30–39. (In Russ.).

9. Markova I.A. Agrotechnics and Technology of Creation of Highly Productive Spruce and Pine Crops by Industrial Methods in the North-West of the RSFSR: Dr. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Leningrad, 1989. 40 p. (In Russ.).

10. Merzlenko M.D., Gurtyachenko J.G. Optimal Height of Three-year-old Spruce Seedlings. Lesohozyaistvennaya informatsiya = Forestry Information, 1990, no. 11, pp. 30–31. (In Russ.).

11. Merzlenko M.D., Zakharova M.I. Influence of Seedling Height on Pine Growth in Forest Crops. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2015, no. 1, pp. 158–162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2015.1.158

12. Moiko M.F., Kovalev M.S. Forest Crop Growth as a Function of Seedling Size. Lesnoe hozyajstvo = Forestry, 1977, no. 1, pp. 52–55. (In Russ.).

13. Mochalov B.A., Bobushkina S.V. Effect of Cassette Type on the Size of Closed-root Pine Seedlings and their Growth in Crops in the North. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2013, no. 5, pp. 65–70. (In Russ.). http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/978/lkh6.pdf

14. Murmanskaya N.P. Importance of Sorting Pine Seedlings in the Conditions of the Arkhangelsk Region. Zashitnoe lesorazvedenie i lesnye kultury = Protective Afforestation and Forest Cultures, 1977, no. 4, pp. 106–111. (In Russ.).

15. Pigarev F.T., Belyaev V.V., Sungurov R.V. Integrated Assessment of Planting Material Quality and its Application in the European North: method. instructions. Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelskiy institute lesa y lesokhimii Publ., 1987. 14 p. (In Russ.).

16. Robonen E.V., Zaitseva M.I., Chernobrovkina N.P., Chernyshenko O.V., Vasiljev S.B. Experience in the Development and Use of Containerized Substrates for Forest Nurseries. Peat Alternatives. Resources and Technology = Resources and Technology, 2015, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15393/j2.art.2015.3081

17. Sokolov A.I., Kharitonov V.A., Pekkoev A.N., Krivenko T.I. Preservation and Growth of Pine Crops Created by Planting Material with Closed Root System in Karelia Conditions. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2015, no. 6, pp. 46–56. (In Russ.).

18. Stepanov S.A., Zaitseva M.I. Cultivation and Use of Planting Material with a Closed Root System: a Textbook for Bachelors, Masters and Graduate Students. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2016. 32 p. (In Russ.).

19. Chernobrovkina N.P., Chhernyshenko O.V., Egorova A.V., Zaitseva M.I., Robonen E.V. Modern Technologies of Growing Planting Material of Coniferous Species and Ways of Improving Them. Lesnoy vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2016, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 6–14. (In Russ.).

20. Shibaeva T.G., Ikkonen E.N., Sherudilo E.G., Titov A.F. Influence of Daily Shortterm Temperature Drops on Heat-loving and Cold-resistant Plants. Fiziologiya rastenij = Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2019, vol. 66, no. 4. pp. 266–276. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015330319040122

21. Aleksandrowicz-Trzcinska M., Bederska-Błaszczyk M., Szaniawski A., Olchowik J., Studnicki M. The Effects of Copper and Silver Nanoparticles on Container-Grown Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur L.) Seedlings. Forests, 2019, vol. 10, iss. 269, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10030269

22. Anstey C. Survival and Growth of 1/0 Radiata Pine Seedlings. New Zealand Journal of Forestry, 1971, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 77–81.

23. Armson K.A., Sadreika V. Forest Tree Nursery Soil Management and Related Practices. Ontario, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Publ., 1974. 177 p.

24. Bayala J., Dianda M., Wilson J. Ouedraogo S.J., Sanon K. Predicting Field Performance of Five Irrigated Tree Species Using Seedling Quality Assessment in Burkina Faso, West Africa. New Forests, 2009, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9149-4

25. Bayley A.D., Kietzka J.W. Stock Quality and Field Performance of Pinus patula Seedlings Produced under Two Nursery Growing Regimes During Seven Different Nursery Production Periods. New Forests, 1996, no. 13, pp. 337–352.

26. Bigras F.J., D’Aoust A.L. Influence of Photoperiod on Shoot and Root Frost Tolerance and Bud Phenology of White Spruce Seedlings (Picea glauca). Can. J. For. Res., 1993, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 219–228.

27. Binotto A.F., Lúcio A.D., Lopes S.J. Correlations between Growth Variables and the Dickison Quality Index in Forest Seedlings. Cerne, 2010, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 457–464.

28. Bumgarner M.L., Salifu K.F., Jacobs D.F. Subirrigation of Quercus Rubra Seedlings: Nursery Stock Quality, Media Chemistry, and Early Field Performance. HortScience, 2008, vol. 43, pp. 2179–2185.

29. Cain M.D., Barnett J.P. An 8-year Field Comparison of Naturally Seeded to Planted Container Pinus Taeda, With and Without Release. Can. J. For. Res., 1996, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1237–1247.

30. Colombo S.J. The Thin Green Line: a Symposium on the State-of-the-art in Reforestation. Forest Research Information Paper 160. Canada, Sault Saint Marie, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Publ., 2005. 175 p.

31. Colombo S.J., Glerum C., Webb D.P. Winter Hardening in First-year Black Spruce (Picea Mariana) Seedlings. Physiol. Plant, 1989, vol. 76, pp. 1–9.

32. Constantino V., Motta A.C.V., Barbosa J.Z., Dolinski M.A., Zanette F., Prior S.A. Initial Growth of Araucaria Angustifolia Rootstock in Response to Fertilization with Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium. Floresta, 2019, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 99–108. http://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v49i1.57467

33. Cossitt F.M., Rindt C.A., Gunning H.A. Production of Planting Stock. Trees: The Yearbook of Agriculture. Washington D.C., Govt. Print. Office Publ., 1949. 944 р .

34. Davis A.S., Jacobs D.F. Quantifying Root System Quality of Nursery Seedlings and Relationship to Outplanting Performance. New Forests, 2005, vol. 30, pp. 295–311.

35. De La Fuente L.M., Ovalle J.F., Arellano E.C., Ginocchio R. Use of Alternative Containers for Promoting Deep Rooting of Native Forest Species Used for Dryland Restoration: The Case of Acacia Caven. iForest, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 776–782. http://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2101-010

36. Dickson A., Leaf A.L., Hosner J.F. Quality Appraisal of White Spruce and White Pine Seedling Stock in Nurseries. For. Chron., 1960, no. 36, pp. 10–13.

37. Duryea M.L. Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests. Corvallis, Oregon, Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory Publ., 1985. 143 p.

38. Dushimimana C., Magomere T., Mulatya J., Vandenabeele J., Olubayo F., Smagghe G., Werbrouck S.P.O. Variation of Morphological Traits and Quality Indices of Micropropagated Melia Volkensii Gurke Clones before Field Planting. Forests, 2022, vol. 13, iss. 337, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020337

39. Fennessy J., O’Reilly C.O., Harper C.P., Thompson D. The Morphology and Seasonal Changes in Cold Hardiness, Dormancy Intensity and Root Growth Potential of Rooted Cuttings of Sitka Spruce. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 2000, vol. 73, iss. 5, pp. 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/73.5.489

40. Grossnickle S.C. Ecophysiology of Northern Spruce Species: the Performance of Planted Seedlings. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press and National Research Council of Canada, 2000. 409 p.

41. Grossnickle S.C. Importance of Root Growth in Overcoming Planting Stress. New Forests, 2005, no. 30, pp. 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2

42. Grossnickle S.C. Why Seedlings Survive: Influence of Plant Attributes. New Forests, 2012, no. 43, pp. 711–738.

43. Grossnickle S.C., MacDonald J.E. Why Seedlings Grow: Influence of Plant Attributes. New Forests, 2018, no. 49, pp. 1–34.

44. Haase D.L. Understanding Forest Seedling Quality: Measurements and Interpretation. Tree Planters’ Notes, 2008, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 24–30.

45. Hallett R.D. Reforestation in the Maritimes. Moncton, New Brunswick, Canadian Forest Service Publ., 1984. 188 p.

46. Hermann R.K. Importance of Top-root Ratios for Survival of Douglas-fir Seedlings. Tree Planters' Notes, 1964, no. 64, pp. 7–11.

47. Hernandez Velasco M. Year-round Production of Forest Seedlings under LED Lamps. Biological and Energetic Implications of Indoor Cultivation. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2021. 108 p.

48. Hubbel K.L., Ross-Davis A.L., Pinto J.R., Burney O.T., Davis A.S. Toward Sustainable Cultivation of Pinus occidentalis Swartz in Haiti: Effects of Alternative Growing Media and Containers on Seedling Growth and Foliar Chemistry. Forests, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070422

49. Ivetić V., Grossnickle S.C., Škoric M. Forecasting the Field Performance of Austrian Pine Seedlings Using Morphological Attributes. iForest, 2016, no. 10, pp. 99–107.

50. Kolevska D.D., Dimitrova A., Cokoski K., Basova M. Growth and Quality of Pinus nigra (Arn.), Pinus sylvestris (L.) and Pinus рinaster (Aiton) Seedlings in Two Container Types. Reforesta, 2020, no. 9, pp. 21–36. https://doi.org/10.21750/R EFOR.9.04.78

51. Kostopoulou P., Radoglou K., Papanastasi O.D., Adamidou C. Effect of Mini-plug Container Depth on Root and Shoot Growth of Four Forest Tree Species During Early Developmental Stages. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2011, vol. 35, no. 4, рр. 379–390. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1104-11

52. Landis T.D., Dumroese R.K., Haase D.L. The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Vol. 7: Seedling Processing, Storage, and Outplanting. Washington D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Publ., 2010. 200 p.

53. Lopushinsky W., Beebe T. Relationship of Shoot-root Ratio to Survival and Growth of Outplanted Douglas-fir and Ponderosa Pine Seedlings. U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Note PNW-274, 1976, 7 p.

54. Luis V.C., Peters J., Gonzalez-Rodriguez A.M., Jimenez M.S., Morales D. Testing Nursery Plant Quality of Canary Island Pine Seedlings Grown under Different Cultivation Methods. Phyton, 2004, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 231–244.

55. Luoranen J., Pikkarainen L., Poteri M., Peltola H., Riikonen J. Duration Limits on Field Storage in Closed Cardboard Boxes before Planting of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine Container Seedlings in Different Planting Seasons. Forests, 2019, no. 10, pp. 1126–1146.

56. Mattsson A., Radoglou K., Kostopoulou P., Bellarosa R., Simeone M.C., Schirone B. Use of Innovative Technology for the Production of High-quality Forest Regeneration Materials. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2010, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2010.485825

57. Mexal J., Rangel R.C., Landis T. Reforestation Success in Central Mexico: Factors Determining Survival and Early Growth. Tree Plant. Notes, 2008, no. 53, pp. 16–22.

58. Mohammed G.H. The Status and Future of Stock Quality Testing. New Forests, 1997, no. 13, pp. 491–514.

59. Mullin R.E., Svaton J. A Grading Study with White Spruce Nursery Stock. The Commonwealth Forestry Review, 1972, vol. 51, no. l, pp. 62–69.

60. Mullin R.E., Christl C. Morphological Grading of White Pine Nursery Stock. The Forestry Chronicle, 1982, vol. 58, no. l, pp. 40–43.

61. Ohlund J., Nasholm T. Growth of Conifer Seedlings on Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen Sources. Tree Physiology, 2001, vol. 21, iss. 18, pp. 1319–1326.

62. Oliet J., Planelles R., Arias N.L., Artero F. Soil Water Content and Water Relations in Planted and Naturally Regenerated Pinus Halepensis Mill. Seedlings During the First Year in Semiarid Conditions. New Forests, 2002, no. 23, pp. 31–44.

63. Oliet J.A., Planelles R., Artero F., Valverde R., Jacobs D.F., Segura M.L. Field Performance of Pinus Halepensis Planted in Mediterranean Arid Conditions: Relative Influence of Seedling Morphology and Mineral Nutrition. New Forests, 2009, no. 37, pp. 313–331.

64. Pawsey C.K. Survival and Early Development of Pinus Radiata as Influenced by Size of Planting Stock. Australian Forestry Research, 1972, no. 5, pp. 13–24.

65. Pinto J.R., Marshall J.D., Dumroese R.K., Davis A.S., Cobos D.R. Photosynthetic Response, Carbon Isotopic Composition, Survival, and Growth of Three Stock Types under Water Stress Enhanced by Vegetative Competition. Can. J. For. Res., 2012, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 333–344.

66. Pomeroy K.B., Green F.K., Burkett L.B. Importance of Stock Quality in Survival and Growth of Panted Trees. Jour. For., 1949, no. 47, pp. 706–707.

67. Puertolas J., Gil L., Pardos J.A. Effects of Nutritional Status and Seedling Size on Field Performance of Pinus Halepensis Planted on Former Arable Land in the Mediterranean Basin. Forestry, 2003, no. 76, pp. 159–168.

68. Puttonen P. Looking for the "Silver Bullet": Can One Test Do It All? New Forests, 1997, no. 13, pp. 9–27.

69. Racey G.D., Glerum C., Hutchison R.E. The Practicality of Top-root Ratio in Nursery Stock Characterization. For. Chron., 1983, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 240–243.

70. Riikonen J., Kettunen N., Gritsevich M., Hakala T., Särkkä L., Tahvonen R. Growth and Development of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine Seedlings under Different Light Spectra. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, no. 121. pp. 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.06.006

71. Ritchie G.A. Assessing Seedling Quality. In Duryea M.L., Landis T.D. (eds.). Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff. Dr. W. Junk. Publishers. Hague, Boston, Lancaster, 1984, pp. 243–259.

72. Roller K.J. Suggested minimum standards for containerized seedlings in Nova Scotia. Fredericton, NB, Information Report M-X-69, 1977, pp. 1–18.

73. Rose R., Carlson W.C., Morgan P. The target seedling concept. General Technical Report RM-200. Roseburg, OR, USA, Proceedings of the Western Forest Nursery Association, 13–17, 1990, 1990, 8 p.

74. Ruosteenoja K., Markkanen T., Venäläinen A., Räisänen P., Peltola H. Seasonal Soil Moisture and Drought Occurrence in Europe in CMIP5 Projections for the 21st Century. Clim. Dyn., 2018, no. 50, pp. 1177–1192.

75. Ryyppö A., Repo T., Vapaavuori E. Development of Freezing Tolerance in Roots and Shoots of Scots Pine Seedlings at Nonfreezing Temperatures. Can. J. For. Res., 1998, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 557–565.

76. Schmidt-Vogt H. Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Planting Stock: Present State of Research and Research Tasks for the Future. Proc., IUFRO XVII World Congress. Kyoto, Japan, 1981, pp. 433–446.

77. Shi W., Grossnickle S.C., Li G., Su S., Liu Y. Fertilization and Irrigation Regimes Influence on Seedling Attributes and Field Performance of Pinus Tabuliformis. Carr. Forestry, 2019, vol. 92, iss. 1, pp. 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpy035

78. Stoeckler J.A., Jones G.W. Forest Nursery Practices in the Lake States. Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office Publ., 1956. 124 p.

79. Sutton R.F. Planting Stock Quality and Grading. Forest Ecology and Management, 1979, no. 2, pp. 123–132.

80. Switzer G.L., Nelson L.E. Effects of Nursery Fertility and Density on Seedling Characteristics Yield, and Field Performance of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 1963, no. 27, pp. 461–464.

81. Thompson B.E. Seedling morphological evaluation – what you can tell by looking. Proceedings: Evaluating seedlings quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of major tests. Proceedings of a workshop held October 16–18, 1984. Corvallis, Oregon, Oregon State University, Forest Research, 1985, pp. 59–71.

82. Tsakaldimi M., Ganatsas P., Jacobs D.F. Prediction of Planted Seedling Survival of Five Mediterranean Species Based on Initial Seedling Morphology. New Forests, 2013, no. 44, pp. 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9339-3

83. Vieira L.M., Gomes E.N., Brown T.A., Constantino V., Zanette F. Growth and Quality of Brazilian Pine Tree Seedlings as Affected by Container Type and Volume. Ornamental Horticulture, 2019, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 276–286.

84. Wahlenberg W.G. Experiments with Classes of Stock Suitable for Forest Planting in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Jour. Agric. Res., 1928, no. 36, pp. 977–1000.

85. Wakeley P.C. Physiological Grades of Southern Pine Nursery Stock. Washington, D.C., Proc. Society of American Foresters, no. 31, 1948. Washington, 1948, pp. 311–322.