Improving Chemical Maintenance Techniques in Forest Plantations. P. 190–201

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 4.7MB )

UDС

630*231.324

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2023-4-190-201

Abstract

This article covers concerns about the elimination of low-value deciduous trees by chemical treatment in favour of conifers. Various methods for removing undesirable vegetation are discussed with an indication of their advantages and disadvantages. Central attention is given to the use of arboricides for the treatment of young growth. It is considered that the chemicals must selectively affect the unfavourable plants, avoid any influence on economically valuable species, and be safe for human health and forest fauna. A practically common method of chemical maintenance was investigated, which includes the injection of arboricides into notches on tree trunks. The authors suggest devices confirmed by the patents of the Russian Federation that are suitable for this purpose. The operational principle is the drilling of the notches with the subsequent injection of arboricide. The proposed mechanical treatment increases productivity by decreasing the complexity of the procedure as well as the physical load on the operator during handling and moving of the equipment. The investigational results are compared with the properties of the Cobra apparatus, which was widely used in the Soviet Union and later in the Russian Federation. The research was performed in young stands of Kokshaysky Forest and Shulkinskoe Forestry in the Republic of Mari El. The comparative results of ecological and silvicultural monitoring on coniferous conditions after chemical treatment revealed the higher performance of the proposed device over the Cobra apparatus. The material in this article is recommended to forestry operators as a guide for chemical maintenance, mainly in young stands.

Authors

Evgeniy М. Tsarev, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: AAB-2166-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5695-3028
Konstantin P. Rukomojnikov*, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: N-6961-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-5081
Sergey E. Anisimov, Candidate of Engineering, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: AAB-1346-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3332-0927
Тatyana А. Konyukhova, Researcher ID: AAU-7113-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-560X
Аndrey V. Krenev, Head of the Training and Production Section of the Educational and Experimental Forestry of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education PSTU, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: AAV-9373-2021, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7670-9732

Affiliation

Volga State University of Technology, pl. Lenina, 3, Yoshkar-Ola, 424000, Russian Federation; CarevEM@volgatech.net, RukomojnikovKP@volgatech.net*, AnisimovSE@volgatech.net, KonyukhovaT.A.@volgatech.net, KrenevAV@volgatech.net

Keywords

chemical treatment of stands, young growth, arboricides, arboricide injection, smothering crops, injector, drilling

For citation

Tsarev E.М., Rukomojnikov K.P., Anisimov S.E., Konyukhova Т.А., Krenev А.V. Improving Chemical Maintenance Techniques in Forest Plantations. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 4, pp. 190–201. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-4-190-201

References

1. Agafonov P.A. Chemistry for Forest Care. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 1962, no. 8, pp. 71–72. (In Russ.).

2. Alekseev G.A. Recommendations for the Care of Young Stands by the Cobra Device. Yoshkar-Ola, 2009. 40 p. (In Russ.).

3. Antropova G.A., Omelyanenko A.Ya. Application of Casoronadichlobenil for the Care of Spruce Seedlings. Chemical Forest Care. Pskov, Lenizdat, Pskovskoye otdeleniye Publ., 1973. pp. 53–58. (In Russ.).

4. Atrokhin V.G., Ievin I.K. Thinning and Intermediate Forest Maintenance. Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1985. 255 р. (In Russ.).

5. Bagaev S.N. Growth of Tree Species Under Different Shading Conditions in Young Stands. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 1963, no. 5, pp. 21–24. (In Russ.).

6. Belkov V.P., Omelyanenko A.Ya., Schepashchenko G.L. Prospects for Chemical Treatment in Forest Clearings. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 1971, no. 8, pp. 43–44. (In Russ.).

7. Denisov S.A., Domrachev A.A., Elsukov A.S. Quadrocopter Practical Application for Forest Regeneration Monitoring. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology, Series: Forest. Ecology. Nature Management, 2016, no. 4(32), pp. 34–46. (In Russ.). doi.10.15350/2306-2827.2016.4.34

8. Krenev A.V. Technical Solutions for Chemical Forest Care. Engineering Personnel – the Future of Russia’s Innovative Economy: Proceedings of the All-Russian Student Conference, Yoshkar-Ola, November 23–28, 2015. In 8 parts. Part 2: Ideas and Solutions for the Innovative Development of Forest and Wood Processing Technology. Yoshkar-Ola, PSTU Publ., 2015, pp. 79–81. (In Russ.).

9. Alekseev G.A., Alekseev Yu.G. A Device for Chemical Forest Maintenance. Patent RF, no. 2236780 С2, 2004. (In Russ.).

10. Anisimov S.E., Tsarev E.M., Krenev A.V., Konovalova Yu.A. A Device for Chemical Forest Maintenance. Patent RF, no. 2633795 С1, 2017. (In Russ.).

11. Tsarev E.M., Anisimov S.E., Zabolotsky V.M., Konyukhova T.A., Krenev A.V., Konovalova Yu.A., Anisimov N.S., Anisimov I.S. A Device for Chemical Forest Maintenance. Patent RF, no. 2690471 C1, 2019. (In Russ.).

12. Ahmad Faiz M.A. Efficacy of Glyphosate and Its Mixtures Against Weeds Under Young Rubber Forest Plantation. Journal of Rubber Research, 2006, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 50–60.

13. Gehring K., Thyssen S., Fester T. Einfluss der Applikation mit abdriftreduzierten Dusen auf Wirksamkeit von Herbizidbehandlungen. Z. Pflanzenkrankh, Pflanzenschutz, 2006, iss. 20, pp. 233–240. (In German).

14. Muro-Sune N., Gani R., Bell G., Shirley I. Predictive Property Models for Use in Design of Controlled Release of Pesticides. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2005, vol. 228-229, pp. 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2004.08.007

15. Papiernik S.K., Yates S.R., Koskinen W.C., Barber B. Processes Affecting the Dissipation of the Herbicide Isoxaflutole and Its Diketonitrile Metabolite in Agricultural Soils Under Field Conditions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2007, vol. 55, no. 21, pp. 8630–8639. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf071256s

16. Primol S., Valantiu-Morison M., Makowski D. Predicting the Risk of Weed Infestation in Winter Oilseed Rape Crops. Weed Research, 2006, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00489.x

17. Sanemitsu Y., Kawamura S., Satoh J., Katayama T., Hashimoto S. Synthesis and Herbicidal Activity of 2-Acylimino-3-Phenyl-1,3-Thiazolines. A New Family of Bleaching Herbicides. Journal of Pesticide Science, 2006, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.31.305

18. Schulte U., Michel A. Vergleichende Nutzenbetrachtung ausgewahlter Breitband herbizide. Z. Pflanzenkrankh, Pflanzenschutz, 2006, iss. 20, pp. 667–674. (In German).

19. Schulte-Dauk V. Neue Produkte und Strategien fur kommende Saison. Getreide Mag., 2002, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 198–201. (In German).

20. Wang M., Mu X., Guo W., Li Y., Li Z. Synthesis and Herbicidal Activity of Novel 5-Substituted Benzenesulfonylureas. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2007, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 674–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-9040(07)60146-9