Density of Scots Pine Wood in Drained Sphagnum Pine Forest. P. 160–171

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 1.5MB )

UDС

630*5

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2023-2-160-171

Abstract

The task of increasing forest productivity has been and remains one of the current interests of the European North of Russia, especially after the period of primary development of the forest areas. In the European Northeast, excessive humidity is observed at rather low average temperatures, which prevents active surface evaporation. In the twentieth century, the hydrotechnical reclamations were conducted on the large areas of swampy forests that increased the total productivity. The ecologists have an ambivalent attitude concerning forest draining. The supporters, who try to protect the undisturbed forest territories, counteract such activities. At the same time, the cultivation of highly productive forests of the right composition and quality requires measures for natural afforestation, or artificial forests must be created. Besides the total productivity of the stands, wood quality is an important factor in the hydroamelioration. It is mainly determined by density and the ratio between early and late wood. The influence of the landscape peculiarities of the drained forests on the quality of the wood was examined by the devotion of the areas according to the most typical groups of microrelief: flat areas, elevations, transitional areas. In cases of extensive humidity, the death of seedlings and artificial forest plantings was observed (soaking, frost extrusion, etc.). The creation of micro-elevations and the drainage of the excessive moisture guarantee the regeneration and establishment of the highly productive forests. The differences in the density of pine wood before and after the hydrotechnical reclamation were detected according to the landscape. The largest changes in the indicator were determined at the elevations and the flat areas, with the increase and the decrease, respectively. The trees that grow on the flat terrain after the reclamation show a relative excess of early wood over late wood, while at the elevations the presence of the late wood is predominant.

Authors

Mikhail A. Zagorodski^1,2, Postgraduate Student; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-4452
Sergey V. Tretyakov^1,2, Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: AAE-3861-2021, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-3114
Sergey V. Koptev^1,2*, Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: ABD-5497-2021, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-1953

Affiliation

¹Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation; lespro@bk.ru, s.v.tretyakov@narfu.ru, s.koptev@narfu.ru*
²Northern Research Institute of Forestry, ul. Nikitova, 13, Arkhangelsk, 163062, Russian Federation

Keywords

drained pine forests, hydrotechnical reclamation, response to draining, pine forest productivity, wood quality, wood density, ratio of early and late wood, stand position in landscape, width of annual layer

For citation

Zagorodski M.A., Tretyakov S.V., Koptev S.V. Density of Scots Pine Wood in Drained Sphagnum Pine Forest. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 2, pp. 160–171. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-2-160-171

References

1. Anuchin N.P. Forest Taxation. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1982. 552 p. (In Russ.).

2. Babikov B.V. Impact of Ditches on Groundwater Level and Forest Growth on Peat Soils. Proceedings of the Scientific and Technical Conference. Leningrad, LTA Publ., 1966, no. 6, pp. 70–74. (In Russ.).

3. Babikov B.V. Hydrotechnical Reclamations. Sankt Petersburg, Lan’ Publ., 2005. 304 p. (In Russ.).

4. Konstantinov V.K. Drainage Efficiency, Sustainable Use and Fire Protection of Forest Lands. Vestnik MANEB, 2016, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 24–33. (In Russ.).

5. Melekhov V.I., Babich N.A., Korchagov S.A. Quality of Pine Wood in Crops. Arkhangelsk, AGTU Publ., 2003. 110 p. (In Russ.).

6. Pakhuchiy V.V. Productivity Factors of Drained Stands in the European Northeast. Syktyvkar, Komi Scientific Center of Ural Branch of RAS Publ., 1991. 114 p. (In Russ.).

7. Poluboyarinov O.I. Wood Density. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ, 1976. 160 p. (In Russ.).

8. Rubtsov V.G., Knize A.A. Establishment and Processing of Trial Plots in Drained Stands. Leningrad, LenNIILKh Publ., 1974. 56 p. (In Russ.).

9. Smirnov A.P. Reasons for Differences in Reclamation Effectiveness of Peat Bogs. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 1986, no. 2, pp. 32–35. (In Russ.).

10. Tarakanov A.M. Growth of Drained Forests and Their Maintenance. Arkhangelsk, FBU “NRIF” Publ., 2004. 228 p. (In Russ.).

11. Tyukavina O.N., Klevtsov D.N., Drozdov I.I., Melekhov V.I. Wood Density of Scots Pine in Different Growth Conditions. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2017, no. 6, pp. 56–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2017.6.56

12. Fedotov I.V., Tretyakov S.V., Ilintsev A.S. The Hydraulic Impact of Land Reclamation on the Quality of Pine Wood. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii = News of the Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy. 2016, iss. 214, pp. 131–140. (In Russ.).

13. Chibisov G.A., Moskaleva S.A., Kryzhanovskaya L.E. The Quality of Pine and Spruce, the Method for Determination. The Issues of the Taiga Forest Management in the European North: A Collection of Scientific Articles. Arkhangelsk, FBU “NRIF” Publ., 2005, pp. 89–99. (In Russ.).

14. Chibisov G.A., Moskaleva S.A., Kryzhanovskaya L.E., Lichutina A.A. The Influence of Complex Treatments on Anatomical Properties of Pine Wood. Proceedings of the Research and Development Conference of 1993. Arkhangelsk, 1994, pp. 45–46. (In Russ.).

15. Bouriaud O., Teodosiu M., Kirdyanov A.V., Wirth C. Influence of Wood Density in Tree-Ring-Based Annual Productivity Assessments and Its Errors in Norway Spruce. Biogeosciences, 2015, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 6205–6217. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6205-2015

16. Ciancio O., Iovino F., Menguzzato G., Nicolaci A., Nocentini S. Structure and Growth of a Small Group Selection Forest of Calabrian Pine in Southern Italy: A Hypothesis for Continuous Cover Forestry Based on Traditional Silviculture. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, vol. 224, no. 3, pp. 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.057

17. Danilov D., Belyaeva N., Zaitcev D. Density of Wood of Pine-Tree and Spruce in the Mixed Mature Forests of the North-West Russia Boreal Zone. Research for Rural Development, 2018, vol. 1, pp. 125–130. https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.24.2018.019

18. Danilov D., Janusz S. Macrostructure and Density of Pine and Spruce Wood on Fallow Lands on North-West of Russia. Research for Rural Development, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.25.2019.005

19. Kamala F.D., Sakagami H., Oda K., Matsumura J. Wood Density and Growth Ring Structure of Pinus Patula Planted in Malawi, Africa. IAWA Journal, 2013, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-00000006

20. Peltola H., Gort J., Pulkkinen P., Gerendiain A.Z., Karppinen J., Ikonen V.-P. Differences in Growth and Wood Density Traits in Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Genetic Entries Grown at Different Spacing and Sites. Silva Fennica, 2009, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 339–354. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.192

21. Saranpää P. Wood Density and Growth. Wood Quality and Its Biological Basis. Ed. by Barnett J.R., Jeronimidis G. England, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell Publ., 2003, 240 p. Available at: https://books.google.at/books?id=NhwSMryGzY0C

22. Wilhelmsson L., Arlinger J., Spångberg K., Lundqvist S.-O., Grahn T., Hedenberg Ö., Olsson L. Structure and Growth of a Small Group Selection Forest of Calabrian pine in Southern Italy: A hypothesis for Continuous Cover Forestry Based on Traditional Silviculture. For. Ecol. Manag, 2006, no. 224, рр. 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580260138080