Address: Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov, office 1425

Phone: +7 (8182) 21-61-18
E-mail: forest@narfu.ru
http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/en/

Lesnoy Zhurnal

Edge Effect in Pine Stands in the Northern Taiga. P. 26–37

Версия для печати

Pavel A. Feklistov, Aleksandr N. Sobolev, Nikolay A. Babich, Natalia R. Sungurova, Vladimir I. Melekhov, Ivan N. Bolotov

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.5MB )

UDС

630*5

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2023-2-26-37

Abstract

The studies are carried out in pine stands situated on the forest boundaries, which are in between the open space locations and forest growth areas. The investigations were made on the territory of the Kholmogorskiy and Primorskiy districts in the Arkhangelsk region. The purpose of the research is to identify the characteristics of meteorological factors at different distances from the edge of phytocenosis as well as their influence on the undergrowth and ground vegetation in the ecotone zone. For this purpose, the vegetation, which grew on the transects at different distances from the edge of the phytocenosis, is described in layers. The transects were positioned perpendicular to the forest boundary. The following parameters were described and measured, such as undergrowth, ground vegetation, luminance, air temperature, wind speed, air humidity. The taxation of the stand was accomplished by using relascopic circular platforms. It is found that luminance, air temperature, and wind speed naturally decrease with distance from the edge of the phytocenosis deeper into the forest. The decrease in luminance can be revealed to 8 m, temperature to 8–15 m, wind speed to 30 m. However, air humidity increases up to 8 m. A correlation between meteorological factors and the distance from the edge of the phytocenosis is determined. The distribution of the undergrowth according to the edges of phytocenosis has a consistent pattern. The undergrowth of heliophytes of pine, birch, and aspen is most abundant at the edge of phytocenoses, and their numbers decrease with distance from the edge. The undergrowth of sciophytes either increases or its quantity does not change. Such distributions are confirmed by correlation analysis. The resulting figures are rated as significant or high. They are reliable at the significance level of 0.05. The number of plants in the grass-shrub tier decreases with the distance deep into the forest. Any define conclusion can’t be made regarding the moss-lichen tier. In general, it can be concluded that the size of the ecotone zone in terms of meteorological factors and indicators of vegetation is 12–14 m.

Authors

Pavel A. Feklistov1 *, Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; Researcher ID: AAC-2377-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-893X
Aleksandr N. Sobolev2, Candidate of Agriculture, Senior Research Scientist; Researcher ID AAS-3366-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-8318
Nikolay A. Babich3, Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: G-7384-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7463-2519
Natalia R. Sungurova3, Doctor of Agriculture, Assoc. Prof.; Researcher ID: H-1847-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-4596
Vladimir I. Melekhov3, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: Q-1051-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-3012
Ivan N. Bolotov1, Doctor of Biology, Director; ResearcherID: P-2892-2015, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-4192

Affiliation

1N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 109, Arkhangelsk, 163000, Russian Federation; pfeklistov@yandex.ru*, dirnauka@fciarctic.ru
2Solovetsky State Historical, Architectural and Natural Museum-Reserve, pos. Solovetsky, Primorskiy District, Arkhangelsk Region, 164070, Russian Federation; alex-sobol@mail.ru
3Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation; n.babich@narfu.ru, n.sungurova@narfu.ruforest@narfu.r

Keywords

pine forests, northern taiga, edge of phytocenosis, edge effect, ecotone zone, meteorological factors, undergrowth of coniferous species, undergrowth of deciduous species, ground vegetation

For citation

Feklistov P.A., Sobolev A.N., Babich N.A., Sungurova N.R., Melekhov V.I., Bolotov I.N. Edge Effect in Pine Stands in the Northern Taiga. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 2, pp. 26–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-2-26-37

References

  1. Akhalkatsi M., Arabuli G., Asanidze Z., Goloshvili T., Togonidze N. Pine Forest on Tree-Line Ecotone in the Mountain Kazbegi in the Georgia (South Caucasus). Sciences and Engineering, Georgia, Tbilisi, 2019, no. 21(1), pp. 7–11. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.21.556149

  2. Anuchin N.P. Forest Taxation. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost Publ., 1982. 552 p. (In Russ.).

  3. Babikov B.V. Ecology of Pine Forests in Drained Bogs. Sankt Peterburg, Nauka Publ., 2004. 166 p. (In Russ.).

  4. Chai Z., Wang D. A Comparison of Species Composition and Community Assemblage of Secondary Forests Between the Birch and Pine-Oak Belts in the Mid-Altitude Zone of the Qinling Mountains, China. PeerJ Preprints, 2016, vol. 4, p. 1900. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1900

  5. Feklistov P.A., Evdokimov V.N., Barzu V.M. Biological and Ecological Characteristics of Pine Growth in the Northern Subzone of the European Taiga. Arkhangelsk, AGTU Publ., 1997. 140 p. (In Russ.).

  6. Feklistov P.A., Filippov B.Yu., Bolotov I.N., Kononov O.D., Torbik D.N. Ecotone Zones in Forest Ecosystems of the North. Vestnik of Pomor University, Series: Natural Sciences, 2011, no. 4, pp. 102–105. (In Russ.).

  7. Field Forest Inventory Guide. Ed. by S.V. Tretyakov, S.V. Yaroslavtseva, S.V. Koptev, Arkhangelsk, NArFU Publ., 2016. 252 p. (In Russ.).

  8. Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Ed. by J. Schelhas, R. Greenberg. Washington D.C., Island Press Publ., 1996. 426 p.

  9. Goryshina T.K. Plant Ecology. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1979. 368 p. (In Russ.).

  10. Holtmeier F.-K., Broll G. Subalpine Forest and Treeline Ecotone Under the Influence of Disturbances: A Review. Journal of Environmental Protection, vol. 9, no. 7, 2018, pp. 815–845. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2018.97051

  11. Kirkman L.K., Mitchell R.J., Helton R.C., Drew M.B. Productivity and Species Richness Across an Environmental Gradient in a Fire-Dependent Ecosystem. American Journal of Botany, 2011, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 2119–2128. https://doi.org/10.2307/3558437

  12. Law D.J. Forest and Range Ecotone Restoration in Central Montana. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers, 2004, no. 9493. Available at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/9493

  13. Kullman L. The Alpine Treeline Ecotone in the Southernmost Swedish Scandes: Dynamism on Different Scales. Ecotones Between Forest and Grassland, New York, Springer, 2012, pp. 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3797-0_12

  14. Malenko A.A., Usoltsev V.A. Investigation of the Edge Effect in Nesting Pine Corps of Different Initial Density in Altayskiy Kray. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University, 2010, no. 4(66), pp. 51–56. (In Russ.).

  15. Melekhov I.S. Forestry Science. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1980. 407 p. (In Russ.).

  16. Odum Yu. Fundamentals of Ecology. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1975. 741 p. (In Russ.).

  17. Pakhuchiy V.V. Productivity Factors of Drained Plantations in European North-East. Syktyvkar, Komi Scientific Center of Ural Branch of RAS Publ., 1991. 100 p. (In Russ.).

  18. Primak R.B. Basics of Biodiversity Preservation. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo NUMTs Publ., 2002. 255 p. (In Russ.).

  19. Recommendations on Allocation and Inventory of Forests Cutting Areas in the Arkhangelsk Region. Ed. by S.V. Tretyakov, S.V. Koptev, et al. Arkhangelsk, NArFU Publ., 2017. 102 p.

  20. Shorohova E., Kuuluvainen T., Kangur A., Jõgiste K. Natural Stand Structures, Disturbance Regimes and Successional Dynamics in the Eurasian Boreal Forests: A Review with Special Reference to Russian Studies. Annals of Forest Science, 2009, vol. 66, no. 2, p. 201. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2008083

  21. Tanner E. Tropical Forest Remnants. Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 1999, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 379.

  22. Tikhonov A.S. Forestry Science. Kaluga, Oblizdat Publ., 2011. 332 p. (In Russ.).

  23. Torbik D.N., Feklistov P.A., Mochalov B.A., Tretyakov S.V. Ecotone Effect in Forest Communities after Corridor Thinning. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2012, no. 5, pp. 46–51. (In Russ.). Available at: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/apxiv/2012/%E2%84%965-2012.pdf

  24. Veretennikov A.V. Plant Physiology with Basic Biochemistry. Voronezh, Izdatel’stvo VGU Publ., 1987. 256 p. (In Russ.).

  25. Veselkin D.V., Shavnin S.A., Vorobeychik E.L., Galako V.A., Vlasenko V.E. Edge Effects for Pine Stands in a Large City. Ecology, 2017, no. 6, pp. 405–412. (In Russ.).

  26. Vomperskiy S.V., Sabo E.D., Formin A.S. Forest Drainage Reclamation. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1975. 296 p. (In Russ.).



 

Make a Submission


ADP_cert_2025.png

Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2025"

INDEXED IN: 

scopus.jpg

DOAJ_logo-colour.png

logotype.png

Логотип.png