Address: Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov, office 1425

Phone: +7 (8182) 21-61-18
E-mail: forest@narfu.ru
http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/en/

Lesnoy Zhurnal

Numerical Study of the Stress-Strain State of a Modified Wooden Beam. P. 167–178

Версия для печати

Danila A. Chibrikin, Mikhail V. Lukin, Anastasiya V. Lukina, Tatiana V. Tyurikova, Svetlana I. Roshchina

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 4.9MB )

UDС

691.11

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2022-3-167-178

Abstract

Preservation of wooden architecture monuments requires special attention since during their operation for 100 years and more wooden structures are exposed to environmental influences resulting in weakening their bearing capacity. The use of external reinforcement systems for buildings of historical value leads to a loss of architectural look. The proposed method of restoring the bearing capacity of the destructed wooden beams in the support zones is based on modification with a polymer composition. We have considered 3 types of pine beams: destructed, modified in the support zones; wooden, weakened by destruction; “healthy”. Numerical calculation of beams with a length of 6 m and a cross-section of 100×200 mm is performed in the Lira software package. The calculation model of the beams considered was created by adapting the initial data for the working environment of the software package used. The computational model is set as a three-dimensional body obtained by triangulation and “extrusion” of beam projection section. Shear stresses in the supporting zone, as well as vertical movements of the beams have been determined according to the developed method of calculation of wooden beams. The parameters of the modified beam and the reference “healthy” structure were compared. Shear stresses in the strengthened beam are 15–17 % higher than in the “healthy” beam. It was found that the strength of the destructed beam modified on supports increased by 16–18 % compared to the destructed beam. The boundary conditions for the modification of destructed wooden beams in the support zones to restore their bearing capacity have been determined on the basis of the obtained results. If the loss of bearing capacity is more than 35 %, then this method is not recommended due to the expediency of replacing such structures.

Authors

Danila A. Chibrikin1, Postgraduate Student; ResearcherID: ACW-3805-2022, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-4559
Mikhail V. Lukin1, Candidate of Engineering, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: E-8085-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2033-3473
Anastasiya V. Lukina1, Candidate of Engineering, Assoc. Prof.;
ResearcherID: O-1352-2016, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-678X
Tatiana V. Tyurikova2, Candidate of Engineering, Assoc. Prof.;
ResearcherID: P-8991-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3592-310X
Svetlana I. Roshchina1, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: A-7722-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-1383

Affiliation

1Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, ul. Gor’kogo, 87, Vladimir, 600000, Russian Federation; dachibrikin@outlook.com*, lukin_mihail_22@mail.ru,
pismo.33@yandex.ru, rsi3@mail.ru
2Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation; t.turikova@narfu.ru

Keywords

numerical studies, polymer composition, modification of wooden beam, wood strength, wooden beam, wood destruction, loading of wooden beam, preservation of wooden architecture

For citation

Chibrikin D.A., Lukin M.V., Lukina A.V., Tyurikova T.V., Roshchina S.I. Numerical Study of the Stress-Strain State of a Modified Wooden Beam. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 3, pp. 167–178. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-3-167-178

References

  1. Karelskiy A.V., Labudin B.V., Melekhov V.I. Reliability Requirements for the Large-Span Laminated Wood Structural Elements. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2012, no. 3, pp. 143–147. (In Russ.). http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/d47/pawx2.pdf

  2. Labudin B.V., Morozov V.S., Orlov A.O. Computer Calculation of Stress-Strain State of Node Connection. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series: Materials. Constructions. Technologies, 2019, no. 3, pp. 45–51. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25686/2542114X.2019.3.45

  3. Matveev R.P., Labudin B.V., Morozov V.S., Orlov A.O. Numerical Analysis of Strength and Rigidity of the Biomechanical System “Bone-Apparatus”. Ekologiya cheloveka = Human Ecology, 2017, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 58–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33396/17280869-2017-4-58-64

  4. Roshchina S.I., Lukin M.V., Lukina A.V., Lisyatnikov M.S. Increased Performance Properties Wood Weakened Biodeterioration by Modifying the Adhesive Composition Based on an Epoxy Resin. Scientific and Technical Volga Region Bulletin, 2014, no. 4, pp. 182–184. (In Russ.).

  5. Roshchina S.I., Lukin M.V., Lukinф A.V., Lisyatnikov M.S. Recovery Wooden Beams Impregnating Polymer Composition Based on Epoxy Resins. Forestry Engineering Journal, 2015, no. 3(19), pp. 183–190. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/14167

  6. Roshchina S.I., Smirnov E.A., Lukin M.V., Lukinф A.V., Gribanov A.S. Destructive Recovery Phase Reference Zone Wooden Beams by Impregnation of the Polymer Solution. Scientific and Technical Volga Region Bulletin, 2014, no. 5, pp. 293–296. (In Russ.).

  7. Adamu M., Rahman Md. R., Hamdan S., Khusairy M., Bakri B., Yusof F.A.B.M. Impact of Polyvinyl Alcohol/Acrylonitrile on Bamboo Nanocomposite and Optimization of Mechanical Performance by Response Surface Methodology. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, vol. 258, art. 119693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119693

  8. Borri A., Corradi M., Speranzini E. Reinforcement of Wood with Natural Fibers. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, vol. 53, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.039

  9. Chernova T.P., Filippov V.V., Labudin B.V., Melekhov V.I. Stress-Strain State of the Elements of a Timber-to-Timber Joint Connected by Inclined Screwed-In Rods. Environmen tal and Construction Engineering: Reality and the Future. Ed. by S.V. Klyuev, A.V. Klyuev. Springer, 2021, pp. 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75182-1_14

  10. D’Ambrisia А., Focacci F., Luciano R. Experimental Investigation on Flexural Behavior of Timber Beams Repaired with CFRP Plates. Composite Structures, 2014, vol. 108, рр. 720–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.005

  11. Dietsch P., Kreuzinger H. Dynamic Effects in Reinforced Beams at Brittle Failure – Evaluated for Timber Members. Engineering Structures, 2020, vol. 209, art. 110018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110018

  12. Dietsch P., Winter S. Structural Failure in Large-Span Timber Structures: A Comprehensive Analysis of 230 Cases. Structural Safety, 2018, vol. 71, pp. 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.11.004

  13. Esmailpour A., Majidi R., Taghiyari H.R., Ganjkhani M., Mohseni Armaki S.M., Papadopoulos A.N. Improving Fire Retardancy of Beech Wood by Graphene. Polymers, 2020, vol. 12(2), art. 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020303

  14. Franke S., Franke B., Harte A.M. Failure Modes and Reinforcement Techniques for Timber Beams – State of the Art. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, vol. 97, pp. 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.021

  15. Frese M., Blaß H.J. Statistics of Damages to Timber Structures in Germany. Engineering Structures, 2011, vol. 33, iss. 11, pp. 2969–2977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.030

  16. Gentile C., Svecova D., Rizkalla S.H. Timber Beams Strengthened with GFRP Bars: Development and Applications. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2002, vol. 6, iss. 1, art. 11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:1(11)

  17. Khelifa M., Celzard A. Numerical Analysis of Flexural Strengthening of Timber Beams Reinforced with CFRP Strips. Composite Structures, 2014, vol. 111, рр. 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.011

  18. Kim Y.J., Harries K.A. Modeling of Timber Beams Strengthened with Various CFRP Composites. Engineering Structures, 2010, vol. 32, iss. 10, pp. 3225–3234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.011

  19. Kolya H., Kang C.-W. Polyvinyl Acetate/Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly (Diallyl Dimethylammonium Chloride) Composite Coated Wood Surface Reveals Improved Hydrophobicity. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2021, vol. 156, art 106253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106253

  20. Koshcheev A.A., Roshchina S.I., Aleksiievets V., Labudin B.V. Local Deformation and Strength Characteristics of S-Shaped Reinforcement in Wood. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 896, art. 012060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757899X/896/1/012060

  21. Koshcheev A.A., Roshchina S.I., Naichuk A.Y., Vatin N.I. The Effect of Eccentricity on the Strength Characteristics of Glued Rods Made of Steel Cable Reinforcement in Solid Wood. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 896, art. 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757899X/896/1/012059

  22. Kreher K., Natterer J., Natterer J. Timber-Glass-Composite Girders for a Hotel in Switzerland. Structural Engineering International, 2004, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 149–168. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686604777963964

  23. Lukin M., Prusov E., Roshchina S., Karelina M., Vatin N. Multi-Span Composite Timber Beams with Rational Steel Reinforcements. Buildings, 2021, vol. 11, iss. 2, art. 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020046

  24. Lukin M., Sergeev M., Lisyatnikov M. Non Split Wooden Beam Reinforced with Composite Reinforcement. Proceedings of EECE 2020. Cham, Springer, 2021, pp. 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72404-7_12

  25. Lukina A., Roshchina S., Gribanov A. Method for Restoring Destructed Wooden Structures with Polymer Composites. Proceedings of EECE 2020. Cham, Springer, 2021, pp. 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72404-7_45

  26. Marzi T. Nanostructured Materials for Protection and Reinforcement of Timber Structures: A Review and Future Challenges. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, vol. 97, pp. 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.016

  27. Nowak T., Jasieńko J., Kotwica E., Krzosek S. Strength Enhancement of Timber Beams Using Steel Plates – Review and Experimental Tests. Drewno, 2016, vol. 59, no. 196, pp. 75–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.12841/wood.1644-3985.150.06

  28. Orlando N., Taddia Yu., Benvenuti E., Pizzo B., Alessandri C. End-Repair of Timber Beams with Laterally-Loaded Glued-In Rods: Experimental Trials and Failure Prediction through Modelling. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, vol. 195, pp. 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.045

  29. Papadopoulos A.N., Bikiaris D.N., Mitropoulos A.C., Kyzas G.Z. Nanomaterials and Chemical Modifications for Enhanced Key Wood Properties: A Review. Nanomaterials, 2019, vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040607

  30. Raftery G.M., Harte A.M. Low-Grade Glued Laminated Timber Reinforced with FRP Plate. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2011, vol. 42, iss. 4, pp. 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.029

  31. Raftery G.M., Whelanb C. Low-Grade Glued Laminated Timber Beams Reinforced Using Improved Arrangements of Bonded-In GFRP Rods. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, vol. 52, рр. 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.044

  32. Sergeev M.S., Gribanov A.S., Roschina S.I. The Stress Strain State of Composite Multi-Span Beams. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 753, art. 032068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/753/3/032068

  33. Sergeev M., Rimshin V., Lukin M., Zdralovic N. Multi-Span Composite Beam. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 896, art. 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/896/1/012058

  34. Stupnicki J. Analysis of the Behavior of Wood under External Load, Based on a Study of the Cell Structure. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica Civil Engineering and Building Construction Series, 1962, vol. 53. 19 p.

  35. Teng T.-J., Mat Arip M.N., Sudesh K., Nemoikina A., Jalaludin Z., Ng E.-P., Lee H.-L. Conventional Technology and Nanotechnology in Wood Preservation: A Review. BioResources, 2018, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 9220–9252. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.4.Teng

  36. Vlad-Cristea M., Riedl B., Blanchet P., Jimenez-Pique E. Nanocharacterization Techniques for Investigating the Durability of Wood Coatings. European Polymer Journal, 2012, vol. 48, iss. 3, pp. 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.12.002

  37. Yahyaei-Moayyed M., Taheri F. Experimental and Computational Investigations into Creep Response of AFRP Reinforced Timber Beams. Composite Structures, 2011, vol. 93, iss. 2, pp. 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.017



 

Make a Submission


ADP_cert_2025.png

Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2025"

INDEXED IN: 

scopus.jpg

DOAJ_logo-colour.png

logotype.png

Логотип.png