Features of the Structure of Pine Stands on Bolshoy Solovetsky Island

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.4MB )

UDС

630*5

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2022-1-77-87

Abstract

The studies were carried out on Bolshoy Solovetsky Island in the White Sea. The research purpose is to identify the features of pine forests in the most frequent growing conditions on the island. For this purpose, 34 sampling areas were laid out in the prevailing types (cowberry, blueberry, and sphagnum) of pine forests. In each sampling area reference trees were selected and measured, and core samples were taken from 64 trees for age determination. The paper shows that the stands are characterised by low quality class and therefore low timber stocks. The quality class in cowberry and sphagnum pine forests is Va; and in blueberry pine forests it is V. Timber stock in cowberry, blueberry and sphagnum pine forests is 92, 90 and 53 m3/ha, respectively, with a fairly close average age of 109–114 yrs. The average diameters in the stands are relatively high, while the average heights, on the other hand, are low. The diameter in cowberry and blueberry pine forests is 21 and 22 cm, respectively, and the height is 12 and 14 m, respectively. Forest stands are mostly unevenaged. An even-aged pine forest was found in only one sampling area, which is 3 % of the total amount; 21 % of stands are relatively uneven-aged, and all the rest are uneven-aged. Absolute age difference and cyclical age difference are the most typical. There is a significant share of relatively uneven-aged pine stands in blueberry and sphagnum forests. Trees in all forest types have a very low relative height. On average, it is equal to 63 cm/cm for cowberry pine forests, 61 cm/cm for blueberry pine forests, and 55 cm/cm for sphagnum pine forests, i.e. for every centimeter of diameter, trees grow in height by 55–63 cm depending on the forest type, and 36–45 % lower than the relative height in mainland pine forests. This indicates that the trees on Bolshoy Solovetsky Island are highly tapering. A negative correlation between relative height and age has been found.

---

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license • The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest

Authors

Aleksandr N. Sobolev¹, Candidate of Agriculture, Senior Researcher Scientist; ResearcherID: AAS-3366-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-8318
Pavel A. Feklistov², Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID:AAC-2377-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-893X

Affiliation

¹Solovetsky Museum-Reserve, pos. Solovetsky, Primorskiy District, Arkhangelsk Region, 163000, Russian Federation; e-mail: alex-sobol@mail.ru
²N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 23, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation; e-mail: pfeklistov@yandex.ru

Keywords

pine forests, forest types, age structure, relative height, average diameter, average height

For citation

Sobolev A.N., Feklistov P.A. Features of the Structure of Pine Stands on Bolshoy Solovetsky Island. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2022, no. 1, pp. 77–87. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2022-1-77-87

References

1. Anuchin N.P. Forest Inventory. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1982. 552 p.
2. Bitvinskas T.T. Dendroclimatic Studies. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ.,
1974. 172 p.
3. Burova N.V., Feklistov P.A. Anthropogenic Transformation of Suburban Forests. Arkhangelsk, ASTU Publ., 2007. 264 p.
4. Verkhunov P.M. Regularities of the Structure of Uneven-Aged Pine Forests. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1976. 254 p.
5. Vysotskiy K.K. Regularities of the Structure of Mixed Stands. Moscow, Goslesbumizdat Publ., 1962. 177 p.
6. State Standard. GOST 16128–70. Forest Management Trial Areas. Methods of Laying out. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo standartov, 1971. 23 p.
7. Gusev I.I. Stand Valuation. Arkhangelsk, ASTU Publ., 2000. 72 p.
8. Gusev I.I., Kalinin V.I. Forest Inventory. Leningrad, LTA Publ., 1988. 61 p.
9. Ipatov L.F. Cedar on the Solovki: (Science Popular Essay). Arkhangelsk, 2005. 36 p.
10. Ipatov L.F., Kosarev V.P., Prourzin L.I., Torkhov S.V. Solovetsky Forest. Arkhangelsk, 2005. 225 p.
11. Komin G.E. To the Issue of the Types of Age Structure of Plantations. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 1963, no. 3, pp. 37–42. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/apxiv/1963/Лесной%20Журнал%20№%203%201963.pd 
12. Komin G.E. Age Structure of Stands in Russian Forests. Sochi, NIIgorlesekol Publ., 2003. 219 p.
13. Maslakov E.L. Formation of Pine Young Stands. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1984. 168 p.
14. Matveyev S.M. Dendrochronology. Voronezh, VGLTA Publ., 2001. 88 p.
15. Matveyev S.M. Dendroindication of the Dynamics of Pine Plantations in the Central Forest Steppe. Voronezh, VSU Publ., 2003. 272 p.
16. Melekhov I.S. Forest Science. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1980. 407 p.
17. Morozov G.F. The Doctrine of the Forest. Moscow, Goslesbumizdat Publ., 1949. 455 p.
18. Nagimov V.Z., Artem’yeva I.N., Nagimov Z.Ya. Differentiation and Drop-off of Trees in Lichen Pine Forests of the Siberian Uvaly Nature Reserve. Forests of Russia and Management in Them: Collection of Academic Papers. Yekaterinburg, USFEU, 2007, iss. 1(29), pp. 138–146.
19. Industrial Standard. OST 56-69–83. Forest Management Trial Areas. Method of Laying out. Moscow, TsBNTI Gosleskhoza SSSR Publ., 1984. 60 p.
20. Field Forest Valuation Handbook. Ed. by S.V. Tret’yakov, S.V. Yaroslavtsev, S.V. Koptev. Arkhangelsk, NArFU Publ., 2016. 252 p.
21. Field Handbook of a Cruiser (for Taiga Forests of the European North). Content by I.I. Gusev, V.I. Kalinin, O.A. Nevolin, N.M. Nefedov, N.A. Shishkin. Vologda, Severo-Zapadnoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, 1971. 196 p.
22. Sukachev V.N. Program and Method of Biogeocenological Research. Ed. by V.N. Sukachev, N.V. Dylis. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966. 332 p.
23. Sukachev V.N., Zonn S.V. Methodology Guidelines for the Study of Forest Types. Moscow, AN SSSR Publ., 1961. 144 p.
24. Tret’yakov S.V. Dynamics of Formation and Productivity of Mixed Pine Stands in the Middle Taiga Subzone of the European North of Russia: Dr. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Arkhangelsk, 2011. 43 p.
25. Feklistov P.A., Sobolev A.N. Forest Plantations of the Solovetsky Archipelago (Structure, State, and Growth). Arkhangelsk, NArFU Publ., 2010. 201 p.
26. Feklistov P.A., Evdokimov V.N., Barzut V.M. Biological and Ecological Characteristics of Pine Growth in the Northern Subzone of the European Taiga. Arkhangelsk, ASTU Publ., 1997. 140 p.
27. Yuknis R.A. Some Regularities of Tree Growth. Modeling and Control of Stand Productivity: Collection of Academic Papers of the LitSKhA. Kaunas, 1983, pp. 118–120.
28. Erteld W. Groesse und Entwicklung des h/d-Wertes in Kieferbestaenden. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 1979, Jg. 150, S. 72–75.
29. Kärkkäinen L., Kurttila M., Salminen O., Viiri H. Effects of Energy Wood Harvesting on Timber Production Potential and Biological Diversity in North Karelia, Finland. Forest Science, 2014, vol. 60, iss. 6, pp. 1077–1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.13-041
30. Larsen J.B., Nielsen A.B. Nature-Based Forest Management. Where are We Going? Elaborating Forest Development Types in and with Practice. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, vol. 238, iss. 1-3, pp. 107–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.087
31. Sharma M., Subedi N., Ter-Mikaelian M., Parton J. Modeling Climatic Effects on Stand Height/Site Index of Plantation-Grown Jack Pine and Black Spruce Trees. Forest Science, 2015, vol. 61, iss. 1, pp. 25–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.13-190
32. Thomasius H.O., Butter D. Studie zueinigen Relationen zwischen Wuchsflaeche, Zuwachs und individueller Stabilitaet von Waldbaeumen, dargestellt an der Baumart Fichte. Beitraege f. d. Forstwirtschaft, 1984, B. 18, H. l, S. 25–28.