Address: Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov, office 1425

Phone: +7 (8182) 21-61-18
E-mail: forest@narfu.ru
http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/en/

Lesnoy Zhurnal

Cytogenetic Characteristics of Seed Progeny of Scots Pine Plus Tree Clones in Karelia

Версия для печати

R.V. Ignatenko, M.A. Ershova, N.A. Galibina, B.V. Raevsky

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.4MB )

UDС

576.356:582.475.4

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2022-1-9-22

Abstract

The article describes the cytogenetic parameters of seed progeny of Pinus sylvestris plus trees growing in the Petrozavodsk seed orchard of the first order. P. sylvestris normal trees from the natural pine phytocenosis in the Pryazha region (Karelia) were taken as a control. The following indicators were considered: relative DNA content, number of chromosomes, frequency and types of mitosis pathologies at the metaphase, anaphase and telophase stages (in % of the total number of dividing cells at the same stages). It was found that the root meristem of the P. sylvestris seed progeny contains 24 chromosomes in the diploid set. Single aneuploid cells (2n = 23; 2n = 25) were found in the studied plants. The most frequent is monosomy (2n = 23). It made up 81 % of the total number of aneuploid cells. The relative DNA content in the young needles of pine seedlings of plus clones and normal trees was 42.07±0.21 and 42.95±0.04 pg, respectively, and the difference between the two was statistically significant (U-test, p ˂ 0.01). Cytogenetic analysis revealed 7 types of mitosis pathologies: chromosome fragmentation, chromosome bridges, chromosome overlap, isolation of chromosomes and groups of chromosomes, chromosome lagging, multipolar mitosis and complex abnormalities. Chromosome overlap was the most common pathology in the general mitotic disorders spectrum. Comparison of mitosis pathologies in two general samples of normal trees and plus tree clones showed that they significantly differ by the following mitosis abnormalities: overlap and isolation of chromosomes in metaphase, fragmentation, lagging, bridges and multipolar mitosis in the anaphase and telophase. The study shows that the proportion of cells with mitosis abnormalities in the seed progeny of normal trees was about 1.5 times higher than of plus tree clones, and is equal 3.44±0.32 and 2.38±0.14 % (U-test, p = 0.05), respectively. The data obtained demonstrate the cytogenetic stability of the seed progeny of P. sylvestris clones from the Petrozavodsk seed orchard of the first order, which in turn may indicate the high quality of the seed material.

Acknowledgments: We would like to express our gratitude to the staff of the Laboratory for Plant Biotechnology of the KarRC RAS and, in person, Candidate of Agriculture, Deputy Director for Science of the Forest Research Institute of the KarRC RAS S.A. Moshnikov and Researcher of the Laboratory for Boreal Forest Dynamics and Production V.A. Kharitonov for their assistance in collecting the field material. We are grateful to the N. I. Vavilov All- Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources for the provision of Triticum aestivum seeds and the Diaem Company for the opportunity to carry out the research on an Attune NxT Flow Cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license • The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest

Authors

Roman V. Ignatenko, Candidate of Biology; ResearcherID: A-7616-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-9465
Maria A. Ershova, Postgraduate Student; ResearcherID: AAP-1610-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-9480
Nataliya A. Galibina, Doctor of Biology; ResearcherID: H-8664-2017, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-3574
Boris V. Raevsky, Doctor of Agriculture; ResearcherID: K-6424-2018, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1315-8937

Affiliation

Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Pushkinskaya, 11, Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, 185910, Russian Federation; e‑mail: ocean-9@mail.rumaria_ershova_karnc@mail.rugalibina@krc.karelia.ruborisraevsky@gmail.com

Keywords

Pinus sylvestris, forest seed orchards, chromosomal abnormalities, DNA content, mitosis pathologies

For citation

Ignatenko R.V., Ershova M.A., Galibina N.A., Raevsky B.V. Cytogenetic Characteristics of Seed Progeny of Scots Pine Plus Tree Clones in Karelia. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2022, no. 1, pp. 9–22. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2022-1-9-22

References

1. Amineva E.Yu. Individual Variability of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) by Drought Resistance: Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Voronezh, 2018. 22 p.
2. Anan’ev V.A., Moshnikov S.A. Structure and Dynamics of the Forest Reserves of the Republic of Karelia. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2016, no. 4, pp. 19–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.4.19
3. Butorina A.K., Mozgalina I.G Specific Cytogenetic Characteristics of Pinus cretaceae and Pinus sylvestris. Ekologia [Russian Journal of Ecology], 2004, no. 3, pp. 185–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RUSE.0000025965.49968.1f
4. Butorina A.K., Muraya L.S., Isakov Yu.N. Spontaneous Mutagenesis in Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The First Case of Mutant Detection with Ring and Additive Chromosomes. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, 1979, vol. 248, no. 4, pp. 977–979.
5. Butorina A.K., Kalayev V.N., Vostrikova T.V., Myagkova O.E. Cytogenetic Characteristics of Seed Progeny of Some Woody Plant Species under Anthropogenic Pollution in Voronezh. Tsitologiya, 2000, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 196–201.
6. Butorina A.K., Cherkashina O.N., Ermolaeva O.V., Chernodubov A.I., Avdeeva I.A. Cytogenetic Monitoring of the Usmansky and Khrenovskoy Autochtonic Pine Stands. Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Seriya biologicheskaya [Biology Bulletin], 2007, no. 4, pp. 508–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359007040152
7. Goryachkina O.V., Sizykh O.A. Cytogenetic Responses of Coniferous Plants in Anthropogenically Disturbed Areas of Krasnoyarsk and Its Surroundings. Hvojnye boreal’noj zony [Conifers of the boreal area], 2012, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 46–51.
8. Egorkina G.I., Valetova E.A. Cytogenetic Study of Scots Pine in Urban Forests of Biysk. Polzunovskiy vestnik, 2004, no. 2, pp. 110–115.
9. Ivanter E.V., Korosov A.V. Introduction to Quantitative Biology. Petrozavodsk, PetrSU Publ., 2011. 304 p.
10. Ilinov A.A., Raevskiy B.V. Genetic Diversity Comparative Evaluation of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea × Fennica (Regel) Kom. Native Populations and Clonal Seed Orchards in Russian Karelia. Ekologicheskaya genetika [Ecological genetics], 2015, vol. XIII, no. 4, pp. 55–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen13455-67
11. Ilyinov A.A., Raevsky B.V. The Current State of Pinus sylvestris L. Gene Pool in Karelia. Sibirskij Lesnoj Zurnal [Siberian Journal of Forest Science], 2016, no. 5, pp. 45–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20160504
12. Ilinov A.A., Raevsky B.V. Analysis of the Pinus sylvestris L. Plus Tree Gene Pool in Karelia Using Microsatellite Loci. Trudy KarNTs RAN [Transactions of KarRC RAS], 2018, no. 6, pp. 124–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17076/eb840
13. Kalaev V.N., Artyukhov V.G., Popov V.N., Ignatova I.V. Cytogenetic Polymorphism of Pine Seeds in Eastern Voronezh Region. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 2010, no. 4, pp. 56–65.
14. Kalashnik N.A. Chromosome Aberrations as Indicator of Technogenic Impact on Conifer Stands. Ekologia [Russian Journal of Ecology], 2008, no. 4, pp. 276–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106741360804005X
15. Laur N.V., Tsarev A.P. Forest Seed Plantations of Karelia. Proceedings of the IV Scientific and Technical Conference “Forests of Russia: Policy, Industry, Science and Education”. Saint Petersburg, POLITEKh-PRESS Publ., 2019, pp.123–126.
16. Mashkina O.S., Kalaev V.N., Muraya L.S., Lelikova E.S. Cytogenetic Response of Seed Progeny of Scots Pine to Combined Anthropogenic Pollution in the Area of Novolipetsk Metallurgical Combine. Ekologicheskaya genetika [Ecological genetics], 2009, vol. VII, no. 3, pp. 17–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen7317-29
17. Mashkina O.S., Tikhonova I.V., Muratova E.N., Muraya L.S. Cytogenetic Features of Seed Progeny of Dwarf Pines in Southern Eastern Siberia. Hvojnye boreal’noj zony [Conifers of the boreal area], 2012, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 127–135.
18. Milyutin L.I., Muratova E.N., Larionova A.Ya. Development of Forest Genetics in Russia. Sibirskij Lesnoj Zurnal [Siberian Journal of Forest Science], 2018, no. 1, pp. 3–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20180101
19. Muratova E.N., Sedel’nikova T.S. Genome and Chromosomal Mutations in Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) under Extreme Environmental Conditions. Hvojnye boreal’noj zony [Conifers of the boreal area], 2004, iss. 2, pp. 128–140.
20. Pardayeva E.Yu., Mashkina O.S., Kuznetsova N.F. State of Generative Sphere of Scots Pine as a Bioindicator of Forest Stability in the Central Black Earth Region in Connection with Global Climate Change. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta lesnogo khozyaystva [Proceedings of the Saint Petersburg Forestry Research Institute], 2013, no. 2, pp. 16–21.
21. Pardayeva E.Yu., Mashkina O.S., Kuznetsova N.F., Popov V.N. Assessment of Sensitivity of Cytogenetic Indices to Weather and Anthropogenic Stress Factors on the Example of Pinus sylvestris L. Organization and Regulation of Physiological and Biochemical Processes. Voronezh, Tsentral’no-chernozemnoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, 2013, pp. 148–155.
22. Plokhinskiy N.A. Biometrics. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1970. 367 p.
23. Pravdin L.F. Scots Pine. Variability, Intraspecific Systematics and Selection. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1964. 192 p.
24. Pravdin L.F., Budaragin V.A., Kruklis M.V., Shershukova O.P. Methodology of Karyological Study of Conifers. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 1972, no. 2, pp. 67-75.
25. Pukhal’skiy V.A., Solov’yev A.A., Badayeva E.D., Yurtsev V.N. Workshop on Plant Cytology and Cytogenetics. Moscow, KolosS Publ., 2007. 198 p.
26. Raevsky B.V. Breeding and Seed Production of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Twisted Pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Load. var. latifolia Engelm) in the North-West of the Russian Taiga Zone: Dr. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Petrozavodsk, 2015. 43 p.
27. Raevsky B.V., Schurova M.L. The Method for Breeding and Genetic Assessment of Scotch Pine Clones at Forest Seed Orchards. Sibirskij Lesnoj Zurnal [Siberian Journal of Forest Science], 2016, no. 5, pp. 91–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20160509
28. Raevsky B.V., Kuklina K.K., Schurova M.L. Genetic and Breeding Assessment of Scots Pine Plus Trees in Karelia. Trudy KarNTs RAN [Transactions of KarRC RAS], 2020, no. 3, pp. 45–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17076/eb1163
29. Sedel’nikova T.S. Differentiation of Swamp and Dry Meadow Populations of the Pinaceae Lindl. Family Species. (Reproductive and Karyotypic Features): Dr. Biol. Sci. Diss. Abs. Tomsk, 2008. 35 p.
30. Sedel’nikova T.S. Cytogenetic Monitoring of Populations of Conifers as an Indicator of Ecosystems Extreme Level. Promy’shlennaya botanika [Industrial Botany], 2014, iss. 14, pp. 54–60.
31. Skaptsov M.V., Smirnov S.V., Kutsev M.G. Nuclear DNA Content in Some Plant Kinds Used as an External Standard in Flow Cytometry. Turczaninowia, 2014, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 72–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/turczaninowia.17.3.8
32. Shafikova L.M., Kalashnik N.A. Characteristics of the Karyotype of Scots Pine under Industrial Pollution. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 2000, no. 2, pp. 30–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr200030136
33. Bogunic F., Muratovic E., Brown S.C., Siljak-Yakovlev S. Genome Size and Base Composition of Five Pinus Species from the Balkan Region. Plant Cell Reports, 2003, vol. 22, iss. 1, pp. 59–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-003-0653-2
34. Bogunić F., Siljak-Yakovlev S., Muratović E., Pustahija F., Medjedović S. Molecular Cytogenetics and Flow Cytometry Reveal Conserved Genome Organization in Pinus mugo and P. uncinata. Annals of Forest Science, 2011, vol. 68, iss. 1, pp. 179–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0019-9
35. Doležel J., Greilhuber J., Lucretti S., Meister A., Lysák M.A., Nardi L., Obermayer R. Plant Genome Size Estimation by Flow Cytometry: Inter Laboratory Comparison. Annals of Botany, 1998, vol. 82, iss. suppl_1, pp. 17–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010312
36. Hizume M. Karyomorphological Studies in the Family Pinaceae. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Ehime University. Series III, Natural science, 1988, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–108.
37. Sedel’nikova T.S., Muratova E.N., Pimenov A.V. Variability of Chromosome Numbers in Gymnosperms. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2011, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 100–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086411020083
38. Valkonen J.P.T., Nygren M., Ylönen A., Mannonen L. Nuclear DNA Content of Pinus sylvestris (L.) as Determined by Laser Flow Cytometry. Genetica, 1994, vol. 92, iss. 3, pp. 203–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132539 


 

Make a Submission


ADP_cert_2025.png

Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2025"

INDEXED IN: 

scopus.jpg

DOAJ_logo-colour.png

logotype.png

Логотип.png