Highly Productive Pine Forests in a Changing Climate

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.5MB )

UDС

630*161.02+630*174.754

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2021-6-9-23

Abstract

Forest steppe of the Central Chernozem Region (CCR) of Russia belongs to the zone of highly productive pine forests. In 2015, for the first time a partial destabilization of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) was recorded within the territory of the CCR. It affected the population, organism and cellular levels of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The destabilization was caused by the 8-year heatwave of 2007–2014 followed by a sharp drop in the water table and four severe droughts (2007, 2010, 2012, and 2014). The analysis was carried out on two sites of pine forest plantations growing in the environmentally sound region: the Stupino test site (Voronezh region, typical plantation for the CCR) and the Usman site (Lipetsk region, lands with elevated groundwater level). The results of morphological, cytogenetic and biochemical studies of model trees of the Stupino test site during the following periods are presented: 4 optimal years in terms of weather conditions, 2014 drought year and 2015 destabilization year. It was found that prolonged hydrothermal stress resulted in the transition of pine from the basic equilibrium state to a slightly nonequilibrium state. The trigger mechanism for changing their vital state was a severe autumn soil drought in 2014, after which the plants became weakened right before winter. A decrease in cone bioproductivity by the traits of seed fullness and the total number of seeds per cone, a change in population sampling structure, an increase in the number of mitosis pathologies, and an increase in proline content in needles were observed despite optimal weather conditions in 2015. The recovery of species was studied for three subsequent optimal years on the example of the Stupino and Usman populations. Experimental data indicate that the processes of vital state normalization involve profound changes in metabolism and require certain energy expenditures. It took the Stupino population longer to return to the regional norm, which indicates a different depth of destabilization of the tree genetic material of the studied populations.

Authors

Nina F. Kuznetsova, Candidate of Biology; ResearcherID: H-7344-2014, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-6698
Elena S. Klushevskaya, Postgraduate Student; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-3470
Elena Yu. Amineva, Candidate of Agriculture; ResearcherID: S-8866-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-7944

Affiliation

All-Russian Research Institute of Forest Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, ul. Lomonosova, 105, Voronezh, 394087, Russian Federation; e-mail: nfsenyuk@mail.ru, ekogenlab@gmail.com

For citation

Kuznetsova N.F., Klushevskaya E.S, Amineva E.Yu. Highly Productive Pine Forests in a Changing Climate. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2021, no. 6, pp. 9–23. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-6-9-23

References

1. Буторина А.К., Калаев В.Н., Миронов А.Н., Смородинова В.А., Мазурова И.Э., Дорошев С.А., Сенькевич Е.В. Ц итогенетическая изменчивость в популяциях сосны обыкновенной // Экология. 2001. № 3. С. 216–220. Butorina A.K., Kalaev V.N., Mironov A.N., Smorodinova V.F., Mazurova I.E., Doroshev S.A., Sen’kevich E.V. Cytogenetic Variation in Populations of Scotch Pine. Ecologiya [Russian Journal of Ecology], 2001, no. 3, pp. 216–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011366328809

2. Ефимов Ю.П. Семенные плантации в селекции и семеноводстве сосны обыкновенной. Воронеж: Истоки, 2010. 253 с. Efimov Yu.P. Seed Orchards in Selection and Seed Breeding of Scots Pine. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2010. 253 p.

3. Исаков Ю.Н., Авраменко Р.С., Буторина А.К., Иевлев В.В., Кузнецова Н.Ф., Мурая Л.С., Пожидаева И.М., Свинцова В.С., Соустова Н.М. Системы семенного размножения древесных растений и селекция // Лесная генетика, селекция и физиология древесных растений. М.: ЦНИИ лесн. генетики и селекции, 1989. С. 47–54. Isakov Yu.N., Avramenko R.S., Butorina A.K., Iyevlev V.V. Kuznetsova N.F., Muraya L.S., Pozhidayeva I.M., Svintsova V.S., Soustova N.M. Systems of Seed Reproduction of Woody Plants and Breeding. Forest Genetics and Breeding and Physiology of Woody Plants. Voronezh, TsNII lesnoy genetiki i selektsii Publ., 1989, pp. 47–54.

4. Калаев В.Н., Карпова С.С. Цитогенетический мониторинг: методы оценки окружающей среды и состояния генетического аппарата организма. Воронеж: ВГУ , 2004. 80 с. Kalayev V.N., Karpova S.S. Cytogenetic Monitoring: Methods for Assessing the Environment and the State of the Organism’s Genetic Apparatus. Voronezh, VSU Publ., 2004. 80 p.

5. Калашник Н.А. Хромосомные нарушения как индикатор оценки степени техногенного воздействия на хвойные растения // Экология. 2008. № 4. С. 276–286. Kalashnik N.A. Chromosome Aberrations as Indicator of Technogenic Impact on Conifer Stands. Ekologia [Russian Journal of Ecology], 2008, no. 4, pp. 276–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106741360804005X

6. Клушевская Е.С., Кузнецова Н.Ф. Оценка устойчивости сосны обыкновенной к засухе по физиологическим характеристикам хвои // Лесоведение. 2016. № 3. С. 216–222. Klushevskaya E.S., Kuznetsova N.F. The Scots Pine Draught Tolerance Assessment Based on Needle Physiological Indices. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 2016, no. 3, pp. 216–222.

7. Кузнецов Вл.В., Шевякова Н.И. Пролин при стрессе: биологическая роль, метаболизм, регуляция // Физиология растений. 1999. Т. 46, № 2. С. 321–336. Kuznetsov Vl.V., Shevyakova N.I. Prolone under Stress: Biological Role, Metabolism, and Regulation. Fiziologiya rastenij [Russian Journal of Plant Physiology], 1999, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 321–336.

8. Кузнецова Н.Ф. Засухи в лесостепной зоне Центрально-Черноземного региона и критерии оценки их интенсивности // Изв. СГУ . Нов. сер. Сер.: Науки о Земле. 2019. Т. 19, вып. 3. С. 142–148. Kuznetsova N.F. Droughts in the Forest-Steppe Zone of Central Chernozemic Region and Criteria for Evaluation of Their Intensity. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Nauki o Zemle [Izvestiya of Saratov University. Earth Sciences], 2019, vol. 19, iss. 3, pp. 142–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7663-2019-19-3-142-148

9. Кузнецова Н.Ф., Машкина О.С. Реакция на стресс и ее последействие у сосны обыкновенной в онтогенезе и при смене поколений // Хвойные бореальной зоны. 2011. Т. XXVIII, № 1-2. С. 83–90. Kuznetsova N.F., Mashkina O.S. Stress reaction and It After-Effect of Pinus sylvestris L. in Ontogeny and at Alternation of Generations. Hvojnye boreal’noj zony [Conifers of the Boreal Area], 2011, vol. XXVIII, no. 1-2, pp. 83–90.

10. Матвеев С.М. Климатический сигнал в радиальном приросте сосновых древостоев модальных типов леса Воронежской области // Лесохоз. информ.: электрон. сетевой журн. 2017. № 1. С. 99–108. Matveev S.M. The Signal of Climate in the Radial Increment of Pine Stands of the Voronezh Region. Lesokhozyaystvennaya informatsiya [Forestry information], 2017, no. 1, pp. 99–108.

11. Пардаева Е.Ю., Машкина О.С., Попов В.Н. Состояние генеративной сферы Pinus sylvestris L. по данным цитогенетического анализа в условиях изменяющегося климата на территории Воронежской области // Сиб. экол. журн. 2017. Т. 24, № 3. C. 313–320. Pardaeva E.Y., Mashkina O.S., Popov V.N. State of Pinus sylvestris L. Generative Sphere According to Cytogenetic Analysis in Changing Climate Conditions in the Territory of Voronezh Oblast. Sibirskiy Ekologicheskiy Zhurnal [Contemporary Problems of Ecology], vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 313–320. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15372/SEJ20170308

12. Переведенцев Ю.П., Гоголь Ф.В., Наумов Э.П., Шанталинский К.М. Глобальные и региональные изменения климата на рубеже ХХ и ХХI столетий // Вестн. ВГУ . Сер.: География. Геоэкология. 2007. № 2. С. 5–12. Perevedentsev Yu.P., Gogol F.V., Naumov E.P., Shantalinskiy K.M. Globaland Regional Climate Changes on the Boundary of the XX th and XXI st Centuries. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology], 2007, no. 2, pp. 5–12.

13. Работнов Т.А. Фитоценология. М.: МГУ , 1978. 384 с. Rabotnov T.A. Phytocenology. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1978. 384 p.

14. Рожков А.А., Козак В.Т. Устойчивость лесов. М.: Агропромиздат, 1989. 239 с. Rozhkov A.A., Kozak V.T. Sustainability of Forests. Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1989. 239 p.

15. Свинцова В.С. Характер изменчивости признаков репродуктивной сферы Pinus sylvestris L. в условиях среднерусской лесостепи (Воронежская область): авто-реф. дис. … канд. биол. наук. Воронеж, 2002. 22 с. Svintsova V.S. Variability Nature of Reproductive Traits of Pinus sylvestris L. in Conditions of Central Russian Forest Steppe (Voronezh Region): Cand. Biol. Sci. Diss. Abs. Voronezh, 2002. 22 p.

16. Селье Г. Очерки об адаптационном синдроме. М.: Медгиз, 1960. 254 с. Sel’ye G. Essays on the Adaptation Syndrome. Moscow, Medgiz Publ., 1960. 254 p.

17. Середа Л.О., Яблонских Л.А., Куролап С.А. Оценка эколого-геохимического состояния почвенного покрова городского округа город Воронеж // Вестн. ВГУ . Сер.: География. Геоэкология. 2015. № 4. С. 59–65. Sereda L.O., Yablonskikh L.A., Kurolap S.A. Assessment of Ecological and Geochemical Situation of Soil Cover in the Voronezh City. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology], 2015, no. 4, pp. 59–65.

18. Топильская Л.А., Лучникова С.А., Чувашина Н.П. Изучение соматических и мейотических хромосом смородины на ацетогематоксилиновых давленых препаратах // Бюл. науч. информ. Центр. генет. лаб. им. И.В. Мичурина. 1975. Вып. 22. С. 58–61. Topil’skaya L.A., Luchnikova S.A., Chuvashina N.P. Study of Somatic and Meiotic Chromosomes of Currants on Acetohematoxylin Squash Preparations. Byulleten’ nauchnoy informatsii Tsentral’noy geneticheskoy laboratorii im. I.V. Michurina, 1975, iss. 22, pp. 58–61.

19. Третьякова Е.П. Теория организации. М.: КНОРУС , 2014. 224 с. Tretyakova E.P. Organizational Theory. Moscow, KNORUS Publ., 2014. 224 p.

20. Шмальгаузен И.И. Факторы эволюции. Теория стабилизирующего отбора. М.: Наука, 1968. 451 с. Schmalhausen I.I. Factors of Evolution: The Theory of Stabilizing Selection. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1968. 451 p.

21. Щербаков В.П. Эволюция как сопротивление энтропии: II. Консервативная роль полового размножения // Журн. общей биологии. 2005. Т. 66, № 4. С. 300–309. Shcherbakov V.P. Evolution as Resistance to Entropy. II. A Conservative Role for the sexual Reproduction. Zhurnal obshchey biologii [Journal of General Biology], 2005, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 300–309.

22. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water-Stress Studies. Plant and Soil, 1973, vol. 39, pp. 205–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

23. Byers J.E., Cuddington K., Jones C.G., Talley T.S. Using Ecosystem Engineers to Restore Ecological Systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2006, vol. 21, iss. 9, pp. 493–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.002

24. Dar M.I., Naikoo M.I., Rehman F., Naushin F., Khan F.A. Proline Accumulation in Plants: Roles in Stress Tolerance and Plant Development. Osmolytes and Plant Acclimation to Changing Environment: Emerging Osmic Technologies. New Delhi, Springer, 2016, pp. 155–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2616-1_9

25. Geras’kin S., Evseeva T., Oudalova A. Effects of Long-Term Chronic Exposure to Radionuclide’s in Plant Populations. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2013, vol. 121, pp. 22–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.03.007

26. Grime J.P. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes and Ecosystem Properties. Chichester, Wiley, 2006. 456 p.

27. Hansen M.C., Potapov P.V., Moore R., Hancher M., Turubanova S.A., Tyukavina A., Thau D., Stehman S.V., Goetz S.J., Loveland T.R., Kommareddy A., Egorov A., Chini L., Justice C.O., Townshend J.R.G. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science, 2013, vol. 342, iss. 6160, pp. 850–853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693

28. Kuznetsova N.F. Self-Fertility in Scots Pine as a System for Regulating Close Relationships and Species Survival in an Adverse Environment. Advances in Genetic Research. New York, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012, pp. 83–106.

29. Kuznetsova N.F., Semenov M.A., Sautkina M.Yu. Pine Forests of East European Plain: Distribution Trends, Functions and Development Problems. Pinus: Growth, Distribution and Uses. New York, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2019, pp. 1–47.

30. Lenton T.M., Held H., Kriegler E., Hall J.W., Lucht W., Rahmstorf S., Schellnhuber H.J. Tipping Elements in the Earth’s Climate System. PNAS, 2008, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1786–1793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705414105

31. Mori A.S. Ecosystem Management Based on Natural Disturbances: Hierarchical Context and Non-Equilibrium Paradigm. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, vol. 48, iss. 2, pp. 280–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01956.x

32. Shvidenko A.Z., Schepaschenko D.G. Climate Change and Wildfires in Russia. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2013, vol. 6, iss. 7, pp. 683–692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S199542551307010X

33. Spiess R. Überlebens und Reproductions Strategien höherer Pflanzen Ergebnisse einer Literaturanalyse. Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftforschung, 1989, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1–198.

34. Sprugel D.G. Disturbance, Equilibrium, and Environmental Variability: What is ‘Natural’ Vegetation in a Changing Environment? Biological Conservation, 1991, vol. 58 iss. 1, pp. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(91)90041-7

35. Thompson I., Mackey B., McNulty S., Mosseler A. Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, and Climate Change. Technical Series No. 43. Montreal, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2009. 67 p. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-43-en.pdf (accessed 28.02.20).

36. Verbruggen N., Hermans C. Proline Accumulation in Plants: A Review. Amino Acids, 2008, vol. 35, iss. 4, pp. 753–759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6