Weather Conditionality of Siberian Stone Pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) Seeding

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.5MB )

UDС

582.475.4:58.05

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2021-2-56-69

Abstract

The dynamics of Siberian stone pine sexual reproduction in the South-Eastern part of the West Siberian Plain was studied by 13-year stationary observations. The stand age was 160–180 years, the average tree height was 22 m, and the average diameter of the trunk at breast height was 53 cm. On average, 50–60 trees were analyzed annually (in different years from 25 to 100). Cones were counted and samples were collected annually from August 10 to August 20. The resercher (usually the author of this paper) climbed each tree, knocked down the cones with operating tools (a bat and a rod), and then their number was counted on the ground. A sample of 10–15 cones was taken from each tree. Afterwards, a complete morphological analysis was performed: the number of sterile and fertile scales, and underdeveloped and developed seeds were counted. Developed seeds were analyzed by the X-ray method. To determine the weight, only perfectly full seeds selected by the X-ray pattern were used. Information on weather conditions was used according to data from the Tomsk station of Roshydromet. The main factor in the cone initiation was the amount of precipitation during 2 years before the start of this process: with an increase in the amount of precipitation, the number of cones increases. However, the final seed productivity depends to a greater extent not on the number of initiated cones, but on the success of their further development. The most important stage in the cone development was spring in the year of pollination and the main negative factor was late frosts. The degree of their negative impact is determined by the sum of the effective (above 5 °C) mean daily temperatures at which the return of frost with temperature from –3 to –4 °C occurred. Complete abortion of cones occurred only when the sum of effective temperatures was 150–180 °C. The same frost at the accumulated temperature sum of 100–150 °C killed a significant part of the cones, and the rest strongly disrupted the development. When the sum of accumulated temperature was about 50 °C, a strong frost significantly increased the loss of seedbuds at all stages of their development, thereby reducing the number of full seeds. The average temperature of September in the pollination year was an important factor in seed production. The loss of seedbuds increased significantly with its increase. The only important trait that is formed in the year of cone maturity is the weight of full seeds: it increases with the amount of precipitation from April to June of the current year.

Authors

Sergei N. Goroshkevich, Doctor of Biology, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: I-5084-2018,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-8656

Affiliation

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, prosp. Akademicheskiy, 10/3, Tomsk, 634055, Russian Federation;
e-mail: pearldiver@yandex.ru

Keywords

Siberian stone pine, seeding dynamics, weather conditions, amount of precipitation, spring frosts

For citation

Goroshkevich S.N. Weather Conditionality of Siberian Stone Pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) Seeding. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2021, no. 2, pp. 56–69. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-2-56-69

References

1. Barabin A.I. Comparative Analysis of Spruce Seed Harvest in Mast and Low-Yield Years in the Educational and Experimental Forestry of the Arkhangelsk Forestry Engineering Institute. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 1969, no. 3, pp. 137–138. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/apxiv/1969.pdf
2. Bulygin N.E. Influence of Droughts in 1972 and 1973 on Flowering and Fruiting of Woody Plants in the North-West of the Russian Federation. Forestry, Woodworking, Pulp and Paper Industry. Leningrad, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1975, iss. 3, pp. 11–13.
3. Vorob’yev V.N. Biological Bases of Complex Use of Cedar Forests. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1983. 253 p.
4. Vorob’yev V.N., Vorob’yeva N.A., Goroshkevich S.N. Growth and Sex in Siberian Stone Pine. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1989. 167 p.
5. Goroshkevich S.N. Dynamics of Growth and Seed Production in the Siberian Stone Pine: The Level and Pattern of Variation in Characters. Ekologiya [Russian Journal of Ecology], 2008, no. 3, pp. 181–188. DOI: 10.1134/S106741360803003X
6. Goroshkevich S.N. Dynamics of Siberian Stone Pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) Growth and Seed Production: Cyclicity or Acyclic Oscilation? Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Biology], 2017, no. 38, pp. 104–121. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/38/6
7. Efremov S.P. Pioneer Stands of Drained Swamps. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1987. 248 p.
8. Iroshnikov A.I. Polymorphism in Populations of Siberian Stone Pine. Variability of Siberian Woody Plants. Krasnoyarsk, ILiD SO AN Publ., 1974, pp. 77–103.
9. Nekrasova T.P. Biological Bases of Siberian Stone Pine Seeding. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1972. 272 p.
10. Nekrasova T.P. Pollen and Pollen Regime of Siberian Conifers. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1983. 86 p.
11. Nesvetaylo V.D. Long-Term Dynamics of Reproductive Activity and Radial Growth of Siberian Stone Pine in the Near-Settlement Cedar Forest of the Southern Taiga Subzone. Ekologiya [Russian Journal of Ecology], 1987, no. 6, pp. 19–25.
12. Tretyakova I.N. Embryology of Conifers. Physiological Aspects. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1990. 157 p.
13. Khromova L.V. Embryological Processes in Unpollinated Pine Seedbuds and Anomalies in Xenogamy. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 1985, no. 2, pp. 47–52.
14. Bisi F., von Hardenberg J., Bertolino S., Wauters L.A., Imperio S., Preatoni D.G., Provenzale A., Mazzamuto M.V., Martinoli A. Current and Future Conifer Seed Production in the Alps: Testing Weather Factors as Cues Behind Masting. European Journal of Forest Research, vol. 135, iss. 4, pp. 743–754. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-016-0969-4
15. Bogdziewicz M., Szymkowiak J., Kasprzyk I., Grewling Ł, Borowski Z., Borycka K. Kantorowicz W., Myszkowska D., Piotrowicz K., Ziemianin M., Pesendorfer M.B. Masting in Wind-Pollinated Trees: System-Specific Roles of Weather and Pollination Dynamics in Driving Seed Production. Ecology, 2017, vol. 98, iss. 10, pp. 2615–2625. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1951
16. Buechling A., Martin P.H., Canham C.D., Shepperd W.D., Battaglia M.A. Climate Drivers of Seed Production in Picea engelmannii and Response to Warming Temperatures in the Southern Rocky Mountains. Journal of Ecology, 2016, vol. 104, iss. 4, pp. 1051–1062. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12572
17. Burns K.C. Masting in a Temperate Tree: Evidence for Environmental Prediction? Austral Ecology, 2012, vol. 37, iss. 2, pp. 175–182. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02260.x
18. Carevic F.S., Fernández M., Alejano R., Vázquez-Piqué J., Tapias R., Corral E., Domingo J. Plant Water Relations and Edaphoclimatic Conditions Affecting Acorn Production in a Holm Oak (Quercus ilex L. ssp. ballota) Open Woodland. Agroforestry Systems, 2010, vol. 78, iss. 3, pp. 299–308. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-009-9245-7
19. Crone E.E., Rapp J.M. Resource Depletion, Pollen Coupling, and the Ecology of Mast Seeding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2014, vol. 1322, iss. 1, pp. 21–34. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12465
20. Daubenmire R. A Seven-Year Study of Cone Production as Related to Xylem Layers in Pinus ponderosa. American Midland Naturalist, 1960, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 187–193. DOI: 10.2307/2422901
21. Fober H. Relation between Climatic Factors and Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Cone Crops in Poland. Arboretum Kórnickie, 1976, vol. 21, pp. 367–374.
22. Fowells H.A., Schubert G. Seed Crops of Forest Trees in the Pine Region of California. Technical Bulletin No. 1150. Washington D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1956. 48 p.
23. Houle G. Mast Seeding in Abies balsamea, Acer saccharum and Betula alleghaniensis in an Old Growth, Cold Temperate Forest of North-Eastern North America. Journal of Ecology, 1999, vol. 87, iss. 3, pp. 413–422. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00352.x
24. Juday G.P., Barber V. A 200-Year Perspective of Climate Variability and the Response of White Spruce in Interior Alaska. Climate Variability and Ecosystem Response at Long-Term Ecological Research Sites. Ed. by D. Greenland, D.G. Goodin, R.C. Smith. New York, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 226–250. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195150599.003.0024
25. Kelly D. The Evolutionary Ecology of Mast Seeding. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1994, vol. 9, iss. 12, pp. 465–470. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90310-7
26. Kelly D., Geldenhuis A., James A., Holland E.P., Plank M.J., Brockie R.E. et al. Of Mast and Mean: Differential-Temperature Cue Makes Mast Seeding Insensitive to Climate Change. Ecology Letters, 2013, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 90–98. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12020
27. Kelly D., Hart D.E., Allen R.B. Evaluating the Wind Pollination Benefits of Mast Seeding. Ecology, 2001, vol. 82, iss. 1, pp. 117–126. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0117:etwpbo] 2.0.co;2
28. Kelly D., Sork V.L. Mast Seeding in Perennial Plants: Why, How, Where? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2002, vol. 33, pp. 427–447. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095433
29. Lindgren K., Ekberg I., Eriksson G. External Factors Influencing Female Flowering in Picea abies (L.) Karst. Studia Forestalia Suecica, 1977, no. 142. 53 p.
30. Nussbaumer A., Waldner P., Apuhtin V., Aytar F., Benham S., Bussotti F. et al. Impact of Weather Cues and Resource Dynamics on Mast Occurrence in the Main Forest Tree Species in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, vol. 429, pp. 336–350. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.011
31. Owens J.N., Bruns D. Western White Pine (Pinus monticola Dougl.) Reproduction: I. Gametophyte Development. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 2000, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 61–74. DOI: 10.1007/s004970000042
32. Pallardy S.G. Physiology of Woody Plants. San Diego, Academic, 2007. 464 p.
33. Pearse I.S., Koenig W.D., Kelly D. Mechanisms of Mast Seeding: Resources, Weather, Cues, and Selection. New Phytologist, 2016, vol. 212, iss. 3, pp. 546–562. DOI: 10.1111/nph.14114
34. Pérez-Ramos I.M., Aponte C., García L.V., Padilla-Díaz C.M., Marañón T. Why Is Seed Production So Variable among Individuals? A Ten-Year Study with Oaks Reveals the Importance of Soil Environment. PLoS ONE, 2014, vol. 9(12), art. e115371. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115371
35. Rapp J.M., McIntire E.J.B., Crone E.E. Sex Allocation, Pollen Limitation and Masting in Whitebark Pine. Journal of Ecology, 2013, vol. 101, iss. 5, pp. 1345–1352. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12115
36. Roland C.A., Schmidt J.H., Johnstone J.F. Climate Sensitivity of Reproduction in a Mast-Seeding Boreal Conifer across Its Distributional Range from Lowland to Treeline Forests. Oecologia, 2014, vol. 174, iss. 3, pp. 665–677. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2821-6
37. Schweingruber F.H. Tree Rings and Environment. Berne, Paul Haupt, 1996. 609 p.
38. Silvertown J.W. The Evolutionary Ecology of Mast Seeding in Trees. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1980, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 235–250. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1980.tb00107.x
39. Speer J.H. Fundamentals of Tree-Ring Research. Tucson, University of Arizona Press, 2010. 333 p.
40. Zamorano J.G., Hokkanen T., Lehikoinen A. Climate-Driven Synchrony in Seed Production of Masting Deciduous and Conifer Tree Species. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 180–188. DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtw117