Zoning of Catchments of Small Rivers in the South of the Volga Upland by the Water Protection Role of Forests

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 2MB )

UDС

634*9:551.48

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2021-1-99-111

Abstract

The article presents the results of the spatial distribution analysis of protective forest plantations within the catchment basins of in the south of the Volga Upland (within the Volgograd region). The data obtained are important for planning agroforestry and land reclamation. The interpretation of 133 reservoirs using satellite images and large-scale (Scale – 1:100 000) isolinear mapping of forest cover in the key areas allowed us to find that for the majority of catchments the low forest cover of the central part of the basin, caused by agricultural land use, is typical. The main environment protection function is performed by large forests of natural (growing in floodplains, uplands and steppe ravines) and artificial origin (forest shelterbelts), localized near the source (in watersheds) and the mouths of small rivers. Depending on the type of plantations and their presence or absence near the source or mouth of the river 6 types of forest cover of catchments in the south of the Volga Upland have been identified: I – river source and mouth have maxima (relative to the rest of the catchment basin) of natural forest cover; II – the source has a maximum of artificial forest cover, the mouth has a maximum of natural forest cover; III – there are no plantations at the source, there is a maximum of natural forest cover at the mouth; IV – there is a maximum of natural forest cover at the source, there are no plantations at the mouth; V – there is a maximum of artificial forest cover at the source, there are no plantations at the mouth; VI – there are no plantations at the source and mouth. It is found that the largest area within the south of the Volga upland is occupied by catchments of the III type (38.3 %), the relief of which is characterized by the predominance of gentle slopes, which have been exposed to the greatest extent to plowing and destruction of natural forest vegetation. Together with catchments of the IV–VI types, having no afforestation in the lower stream, about 59.2 % of plantations of the south of the Volga Upland are not protected from the processes of water erosion and deflation.

Authors

Olga Yu. Kosheleva, Candidate of Agriculture; ResearcherID: B-3579-2018,
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9616-2383

Affiliation

Federal Scientific Centre of Agroecology, Complex Melioration, and Protective Afforestation, Russian Academy of Sciences, prosp. Universitetskiy, 97, Volgograd, 400062, Russian Federation; e-mail: olya_ber@mail.ru

Keywords

protective forests, Volga Upland, catchment, forest cover, space image interpretation, isolinear mapping, zon

For citation

Kosheleva O.Yu. Zoning of Catchments of Small Rivers in the South of the Volga Upland by the Water Protection Role of Forests. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2021, no. 1, pp. 99–111. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-1-99-111

References

1. Bodrova V.N. Mapping of Forest Coverage of the Sarpinsky Icland (Volgograd Oblast). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5, Geography], 2018, no. 3, pp. 47–54.
2. Brylev V.A. Evolutionary Geomorphology of the Southeast of the Russian Plain. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2005. 351 p.
3. Byallovich Yu.P. Biogeocenological Basis of the Theory of Forest Systems. Problems of Biogeocenology. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973, pp. 47–58.
4. Vasjukov V.M. Botanical and Geographical Regionalization of the Privolzhye Hills. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2012, vol. 14, no. 1(7), pp. 1712–1716.
5. Zinoveva I.S. The General and Special in Territorial Distribution and Economic Use of Forest Resources of Russia. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye yavleniya i protsessy [Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes], 2013, no. 11(057), pp. 32–36.
6. Kostin K.M. Current State, Ameliorative Potential and Possibilities of Renewing Protective Forest Plantations in Watersheds of the Steppe Zone of the European Part of Russia: Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Volgograd, 2009. 23 p.
7. Regional Studies: Biological and Landscape Diversity of Nature of the Volgograd Region. Ed. by V.A. Sagalaev. Moscow, Globus Publ., 2008. 272 p.
8. Kryukov K.K. Structure of Small and Medium River Basins of the Volgograd Right Bank and Their Anthropogenic Transformation: Cand. Geogr. Sci. Diss. Abs. Moscow, 2014. 22 p.
9. Kuzmenko Ya.V., Lisetskiy F.N., Kirilenko J.A., Grigorieva O.I. Providing the Optimum Water Protection Forests Amount at Basin Organization of Nature Management. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2013, vol. 15, no. 3(2), pp. 652–657.
10. Kulik K.N., Manayenkova N.S. Compilation of Isolinear Maps of Forest Cover Based on Aerospace Photographs. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 1996, no. 4, pp. 45–46.
11. Labutina I.A. Aerospace Image Interpretation. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2004. 184 p.
12. Mal’tsev K.A., Yermolaev O.P. Using Dems for Automatic Plotting of Catchments. Geomorfologiya [Geomorphology RAS], 2014, no. 1, pp. 45–53.
13. Rulev A.S., Kosheleva O.Yu. Cartographical Modelling of Woodiness for Adaptive and Landscape Arrangement of Catchments (on the Example of the Olhovka River Basin of the Volgograd Region). Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vyssheye professional’noye obrazovaniye [Proceedings of Nizhnevolzskiy Agrouniversity Complex: Science and Higher Vocational Education], 2014, no. 4(36), pp. 32–36.
14. Sabitova A.G., Kulagin A.Ju., Giniyatullin R.Kh. Assessment of Level of Woodiness of the Water-Collecting Areas and Condition of Reservoirs (on the Example of the Republic of Bashkortostan). Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Biologiya [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Biology], 2013, vol. 2, no. 7(298), pp. 187–190.
15. Sazhin A.N., Kulik K.N., Vasil’yev Yu.I. Weather and Climate of the Volgograd Region. Volgograd, VNIALMI Publ., 2010. 306 p.
16. Seregin A.P. Floristic Grid Mapping: Global Experience and Current Trends. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Biologiya i ekologiya [Herald of Tver State University. Series: Biology and Ecology], 2013, no. 32, pp. 210–245.
17. Bodart C., Brink A.B., Donnay F., Lupi A., Mayaux P., Achard F. Continental Estimates of Forest Cover and Forest Cover Changes in the Dry Ecosystems of Africa between 1990 and 2000. Journal of Biogeography, 2013, vol. 40, iss. 6, pp. 1036–1047. DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12084
18. Cihlar J. Land Cover Mapping of Large Areas from Satellites: Status and Research Priorities. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, vol. 21, iss. 6-7, pp. 1093–1114. DOI: 10.1080/014311600210092
19. Dong J., Xiao X., Sheldon S., Biradar Ch., Zhang G., Duong N.D., Hazarika M., Wikantika K., Takeuhci W., Moore B. A 50-m Forest Cover Map in Southeast Asia from ALOS/PALSAR and Its Application on Forest Fragmentation Assessment. PLоS ONE, 2014, vol. 9(1). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085801
20. Firoz A., Laxmi G. Geospatial Assessment of Forest Fires in Jharkhand (India). Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2017, vol. 10, iss. 21, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i21/113215
21. Mather P.M. Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: An Introduction. New York, Wiley, 2005. 442 p.
22. Palma J.H.N., Graves A.R., Burgess P.J., Keesman K.J., van Keulen H., Mayus M., Reisner Y., Herzog F. Methodological Approach for the Assessment of Environmental Effects of Agroforestry at the Landscape Scale. Ecological Engineering, 2007, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 450–462. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.016
23. Richards J.A. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Berlin, Springer, 2013. 494 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30062-2
24. Treitz P., Howarth P. High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Data for Forest Ecosystem Classification: An Examination of Spatial Scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000, vol. 72, iss. 3, pp. 268–289. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00098-X