Stem Volume and Quality of Hybrid and Common Aspen in the Clonal Archive

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.4MB )

UDС

630*232.13+630*176.232.3

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2021-1-92-98

Abstract

Hybrid aspen as a fast growing tree species with short rotation is of interest for the creation of plantation forest crops in intensive forest management. Hybrid aspen wood is used to produce paper, lumber, and plywood, as well as biofuel. The research purpose is to compare the volume and quality of the stem of hybrid and common aspen, and to assess interclonal variability by these features in cold climate areas. The research results of 42 hybrid and 10 common aspen clones in the clonal archive of the Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences are presented. The archive was laid out in 2009 by 1-year-old rooted seedlings with a closed root system with the placement of plants 3×3 m. Donor plants were obtained at the Haapastensyrjä Tree Breeding Station of the Natural Resources Institute Finland. Scales have been developed for assessing plant health and stem straightness. Herewith, the height of trees, the presence of sores, scars and frost clefts on their stems were recorded. The share of tree-like and shrub-like plants was 70 and 5 %, respectively, with an average survival of 75 % at the 10-year biological age. Hybrid aspen was statistically significant in terms of superiority to standard aspen in diameter by 65 %, height by 49 %, and stem volume by more than 3 times. The share of slightly crooked stems was about 7 %, and the share of stems with bark cracks was about 3 %. Good survival, stem quality, and rapid growth of hybrid aspen made it possible to conclude that it is a promising species for plantation reforestation in the taiga zone.

Authors

Aleksey L. Fedorkov, Doctor of Biology, Leading Research Scientist;

Affiliation

Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Kommunisticheskaya, 28, Syktyvkar, 167982, Russian Federation; e-mail: fedorkov@ib.komisc.ru

Keywords

Populus tremula L., Populus tremuloides Michx., clones, stem growth, survival

For citation

Fedorkov A.L. Stem Volume and Quality of Hybrid and Common Aspen in the Clonal Archive. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2021, no. 1, pp. 92–98. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-1-92-98

References

1. Boytsov A.K., Zhigunov A.V., Grigor’yev A.A., Bondarenko A.S. Assessment of the Prospects of Using of Hybrid Poplar and Aspen Clones for Plantation Reforestation in the North-West of Russia. Forests of Russia: Politics, Industry, Science, and Education: Proceedings of the International Conference, Saint Petersburg, May 23–24, 2018. Saint Petersburg, SPbFTU Publ., 2018, pp. 40–43.
2. Voynov G.S., Chuprov N.P., Yaroslavtsev S.V. Forest Valuation Handbook for the North-East Part of the Russian Federation (Official Materials for the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Arkhangelsk and Vologda Regions and Komi Republic). Arkhangelsk, SevNIILH Publ., 2012. 672 p.
3. Demidova N.A, Durkina T.M. Growth and Development Features of Poplars in the European North of Russia. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2013, no. 5, pp. 78–87. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/97b/lkh8.pdf
4. Zhigunov A.V., Markova I.A., Grigor’ev A.A., Viukhlish G., Rakestrou D. Comparative Test of Hybrid Poplar and Hybrid Aspen Clones on the Hardwood Plantations in North-West Russia. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii [News of the Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy], 2013, vol. 205, pp. 16–24.
5. Svalov N.N. Analysis of Variance. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1977. 176 p.
6. Fedorkov A.L. Vitality and Height of Quaking Aspen Trees in the Clone Archive. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 2016. no. 3, pp. 195–198.
7. Hassinen V., Vallinkoski V.-M., Issakainen S., Tervahauta A., Kärenlampi S., Servomaa K. Correlation of Foliar MT2b Expression with Cd and Zn Concentrations in Hybrid Aspen (Populus tremula × tremuloides) Grown in Contaminated Soil. Environmental Pollution, 2009, vol. 157, iss. 3, pp. 922–930. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.10.023
8. Hjelm K., Rytter L. The Demand of Hybrid Aspen (Populus tremula × P. tremuloides) on Site Conditions for a Successful Establishment on Forest Land. Silva Fennica, 2018, vol. 52, no. 5, art. 10036. DOI: 10.14214/sf.10036
9. Hytönen J., Beuker E., Viherä-Aarnio A. Clonal Variation in Basic Density, Moisture Content and Heating Value of Wood, Bark and Branches in Hybrid Aspen. Silva Fennica, 2018, vol. 52, no. 2, art. 9938. DOI: 10.14214/sf.9938
10. Jansons Ā., Zeps M., Rieksts- Riekstiņš J., Matisons R., Krišāns O. Height Increment of Hybrid Aspen Populus tremuloides × P. tremula as a Function of Weather Conditions in Central Part of Latvia. Silva Fennica, 2014, vol. 48, no. 5, art. 1124. DOI: 10.14214/sf.1124
11. Malá J., Máchová P., Cvrčková H., Čížková L. Aspen Micropropagation: Use for Phytoremediation of Soils. Journal of Forest Science, 2006, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 101–107. DOI: 10.17221/4491-JFS
12. Pliura A., Suchockas V., Sarsekova D., Gudynaitė V. Genotypic Variation and Heritability of Growth and Adaptive Traits, and Adaptation of Young Poplar Hybrids at Northern Margins of Natural Distribution of Populus nigra in Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014, vol. 70, pp. 513–529. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.09.011
13. Rytter L. Sustainable Cultivation of Hybrid Aspen with Natural Shoot Regeneration. Arbetsrapport 2014–2019. Uppsala, Skogforsk, 2019, vol. 1014. 34 p.
14. Rytter L., Rytter R.-M. Productivity and Sustainability of Hybrid Aspen (Populus tremula L. × Populus tremuloides Michx.) Root Sucker Stands with Varying Management Strategies. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017, vol. 401, pp. 223–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.020
15. Šēnhofa S., Zeps M., Gailis A., Kāpostiņš R., Jansons Ā. Development of Stem Cracks in Young Hybrid Aspen Plantations. Forestry Studies, 2016, vol. 65, iss. 1, pp. 16–23. DOI: 10.1515/fsmu-2016-0008
16. Stener L.-G., Westin J. Early Growth and Phenology of Hybrid Aspen and Poplar in Clonal Field Tests in Scandinavia. Silva Fennica, 2017, vol. 51, no. 3, art. 5656. DOI: 10.14214/sf.5656
17. Stener L.-G., Rungis D., Belevich V., Malm J. Change of Clonal Frequency in the Second Root Sucker Generation of Hybrid Aspen. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, vol. 408, pp. 174–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.034
18. Stener L.-G., Rytter L., Beuker E., Tullus H., Lutter R. Hybrid Aspen and Poplars in the Baltic Sea Region and Iceland. Arbetsrapport 999–2019. Uppsala, Skogforsk, 2019, vol. 999. 41 p.
19. Tsarev A.P. Growth and Breeding of Aspen in Russia. Silvae Genetica, 2013, vol. 62, iss. 1-6, pp. 153–160. DOI: 10.1515/sg-2013-0020
20. Tsarev A., Tsareva R., Tsarev V., Fladung M, Wühlisсh G. Aspen Hybridization: Parents’ Compatibility and Seedlings’ Growth. Silvae Genetica, 2018, vol. 67, iss. 1, pp. 12–19. DOI: 10.2478/sg-2018-0002
21. Tullus A., Rytter L., Tullus T., Weih M., Tullus H. Short-Rotation Forestry with Hybrid Aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) in Northern Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2012, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 10–29. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.628949
22. Tullus A., Lukason O., Vares A., Padari A., Lutter R., Tullus T., Karoles K., Tullus H. Economics of Hybrid Aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) and Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth.) Plantations on Abandoned Agricultural Lands in Estonia. Baltic Forestry, 2012, vol. 18(2), pp. 288–298.