Wood Waste Potential as Forestry Competitive Advantage (By the Example of the Arctic Inland Territories of the Russian European North)

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.4MB )

UDС

630*8

DOI:

10.17238/issn0536-1036.2019.6.280

Abstract

The research subject is to give consideration of up-to-date best practices of wood waste commercial use, aimed at enhancing forestry competitiveness in the Arctic zone. The research aim is to provide an insight into the potential of wood waste obtained from various logging modes on the territory of the Russian European North and possibilities of its use for commercially successful production. Results of the analysis of business activities of the Russian European North logging enterprises has identified that between 16 and 22 % of wood waste of the total harvested volume are left on cutting area. Between 1.6 to 2.2 mln m3 of wood waste and firewood suitable for further use are left annually on cutting areas in Arkhangelsk Region only. According to estimations, the potential of wood waste obtained from thinning in protected forests in the Arctic zone mainland of the Russian European North is about 1 mln m3 annually for coniferous species only. The calculation of resources based on the total available forest fund, as well as harvesting forest fund was done. One of the main reasons of wood waste recycling inhibition on the Arctic territory is insufficient and unevenly developed transport network. Floating factories at the estuaries of the Arctic rivers could possibly mitigate this disadvantage. Tschudi Shipping Company from Norway has made a conceptual design of a forest FPSO (Floating Production Storage and Offloading) that can process waste wood into high value sugar (wood molasses) and high-energy wood pellets. Estimation of commercial appeal of wood waste recycling has been analyzed through the example of the Arkhangelsk Region. The benchmarking study of competitive advantages of up-to-date Norwegian and Russian experiences of wood waste exploitation has been conducted. The Norwegian Research Council has funded the project through their NORRUS program.

Authors

H. Falck¹, Managing Director; ORCID: 0000-0003-4976-5453
K.L. Mikhaylov², Candidate of Economics, Leading Research Scientist; ORCID: 0000-0001-9296-3266
N.A. Demidova², Candidate of Biology, Deputy Director (Sciences); ResearcherID: T-1151-2019, ORCID: 0000-0003-2673-2309

Affiliation

¹Tschudi Bio Company AS, Strandveien 50, 1366 Lysaker, Norway; e-mail: hf@tschudishipping.no
²Northern Research Institute of Forestry, ul. Nikitova, 13, Arkhangelsk, 163062, Russian Federation; e-mail: forestry@sevniilh-arh.ru

Keywords

forestry, wood waste, competitive advantages, Arctic territories, logistics, Russian and Norwegian practices of wood waste use

For citation

Falck H., Mikhaylov K.L., Demidova N.A. Wood Waste Potential as Forestry Competitive Advantage (By the Example of the Arctic Inland Territories of the Russian European North). Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2019, no. 6, pp. 280–289. DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2019.6.280

References

1. Angelstam P., Naumov V., Elbakidze M. Transitioning from Soviet Wood Mining to Sustainable Forest Management by Intensification: are Tree Growth Rates Different in Northwest Russia and Sweden? Forestry, 2017, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 292–303.
2. Decree of the President of Russia dd. 27.06.2017 No. 287 "On the Land Territories of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation”. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru (accessed 10.04.2019).
3. Falck H. Tschudi Shipping Company: Logistics In High North. INTSOK. Saint Petersburg, 2011.
4. Helmisaari H.S., Hanssen K.H., Jacobson S., Kukkola M., Luiro J., Saarsalmi A., Tamminen P., Tveite B. Logging Residue Removal after Thinning in Nordic Boreal Forests: Long-Term Impact on Tree Growth. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, vol. 261, no. 11, pp. 1919–1927.
5. Korobov V.V., Rushnov N.P. Processing of the Low-Grade Raw Materials (Problems of Non-Waste Technology). Moscow, 1991. 288 p.
6. Mikhaylov K.L., Gushchin V.A., Tarakanov A.M. Collection and Processing of Logging Residual and Firewood in a Felling Area. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Forestry Journal], 2016, no. 6, pp. 98–109. DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.6.98; URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/3f1/98109.pdf
7. Mikhajlov G.M., Serov N.A. The Ways of Improvement of the Secondary Wood Raw Material. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1988. 222 p.
8. Mosyagin V.I. Problems of the Forest Sector Greening. Saint Petersburg, 1999. 375 p.
9. Nordström E.-M., Nieuwenhuis M., Başkent E.Z., Biber P., Black K., Borges J.G., Bugalho M.N., Corradini G., Corrigan E., Eriksson L.O., Felton A., Forsell N., Hengeveld G., Hoogstra-Klein M., Korosuo A., Lindbladh M., Lodin I., Lundholm A., Marto M., Masiero M., Mozgeris G., Pettenella D., Poschenrieder W., Sedmak R., Tucek J., Zoccatelli D. Shifting from Even-aged Management to Less Intensive Forestry in Varying Proportions of Forest Land in Finland: Impacts on Carbon Storage, Harvest Removals, and Harvesting Costs. European Journal of Forest Research. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-019-01189-z
10. Nunez-Mir G.C., Desprez J.M., Iannone B.V., Clark T.L., Fei S. An Automated Content Analysis of Forestry Research: Are Socioecological Challenges Being Addressed? Journal of Forestry, 2017, vol. 115, no. 1.
11. On the Forest Management Plan of the Nenetskiy Autonomous Okrug. Order by the Governor of the Nenetskiy Autonomous Okrug dd. 20.11.2015 No. 95-pg. Available at: https://www.lawmix.ru/zakonodatelstvo/952343 (accessed 07.05.2019).
12. Pretzsch H., Miren del Río, Biber P., Arcangeli C., Bielak K., Brang P., Dudzinska M., Forrester D. I., Klädtke J., Kohnle U., Ledermann T., Matthews R., Nagel J., Nagel R., Nilsson U., Ningre F., Nord-Larsen T., Wernsdörfer H., Sycheva E. Maintenance of Long-term Experiments for Unique Insights into Forest Growth Dynamics and Trends: Review and Perspectives. European Journal of Forest Research, 2019, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 165–185.
13. Reglaments of the Forest Districts (Republiс of Kareliya). Available at: https://minprirody.karelia.ru/lesnoe-hozjajstvo/reglamenty-lesnichestv (accessed 07.05.2019).
14. Spinelli R., Lombardini C., Marchi E., Aminti G. A Low-investment Technology for the Simplified Processing of Energy Wood from Coppice Forests. European. Journal of Forest Research, 2019, vol. 138, no 1, pp. 31–41.
15. The Forest Districts Reglaments (Arkhangelsk Region). Available at: http://old.dvinaland.ru.s3.amazonaws.com/dvinaland.ru/power/departments/deples/acts/lesregl.html (accessed 07.05.2019).
16. The Forest Management Plan of the Murmansk Region. Available at: https://mpr.gov-murman.ru/documents/lesplan (accessed 07.05.2019).
17. The Strategy of Advancement of the Forest Complex of the Russian Federation for the Period to Until 2030. Resolution of the Russian Federation Government dd. 20.09.2018 No. 1989. Available at: http://static.government.ru (accessed 10.04.2019).
18. The Strategies of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation Advancement and Provision of National Security for the Period to Until 2010. Available at: http://government.ru (accessed 07.05.2019).
19. Victor D., Yueh L. The New Energy Order. Foreign Affairs, 2010, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 61–73.
20. Yakusheva T.V. Integrated Assessment of the Availability of Forest Resources Considering the Development of Forest Transport Infrastructure in the North-West Federal District. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Forestry Journal], 2014, no. 5, pp. 113–117. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/b1b/3-_-kompleksnaya-otsenka-dostupnostilesnykh-resursov.pdf