Management of Repong Damar Agroforestry in Lampung Province (Indonesia). P. 9-27

Complete text of the article:

Printed copies of the back issues are available in the editorial office of the journal on application to e-mail: forest@narfu.ru. An electronic version of individual issues and articles can be purchased at Rucont.ru.

UDС

630*2

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2026-2-9-27

Abstract

Community culture in land management plays a vital role in sustainable development and the preservation of traditional agroforestry systems. This study aims to analyze the role of community culture in the management of Repong Damar agroforestry within the framework of Community-Based Forest Management in Lampung Province, Indonesia. A qualitative research approach was adopted, utilizing data obtained through participatory observations, indepth interviews with key stakeholders, and comprehensive documentation studies. The results demonstrate that while Community-Based Forest Management programs aim to provide socio-economic benefits, their success is inextricably linked to the evolving cultural identity and traditional practices of the local community. Current government policies at both central and regional levels are perceived as ineffective in ensuring the long-term preservation of Repong Damar agroforestry systems. Consequently, the study suggests that the Regency Government of Pesisir Barat should implement dedicated cultural preservation policies, including the promotion of cultural tourism, to safeguard these unique landscapes. Integrating traditional legal principles, norms, and indigenous institutions into formal regulations is essential for developing a truly sustainable and equitable management model. Such integration ensures that cultural identity remains preserved for future generations while maintaining the ecological balance of the forest. This study concludes that the cultural values of the community are indispensable for the resilience of agroforestry systems. Future research should focus on the intersection of cultural conservation policies and climate change challenges in agroforestry management.

Authors

Indra Gumay Febryano*, PhD, Prof.; ResearcherID: AAW-4454-2021,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-656X
Novita Wibowo, Research Scientist; ResearcherID: OGP-1201-2025,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1036-8798
Sugeng Prayitno Harianto, PhD, Prof.; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9152-3880
Bainah Sari Dewi, PhD, Assoc. Prof.; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0638-1138

Affiliation

Universitas Lampung, Department of Forestry, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia, 35145; indra.gumay@fp.unila.ac.id*, wibowonovita2002@gmail.com, sugeng.prayitno@fp.unila.ac.id,
bainah.saridewi@fp.unila.ac.id

Keywords

agroforestry, forest management, community-based forest management, community forest management, environment, sustainable development, Repong Damar

For citation

Febryano I.G., Wibowo N., Harianto S.P., Dewi B.S. Management of Repong Damar Agroforestry in Lampung Province (Indonesia). Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2026, no. 2, pp. 9–27. https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2026-2-9-27

References

1. Adalina Y., Sawitri R. Vegetation Analysis, Physico-Chemical Properties and Economic Potential of Damar (Agathis dammara) in Mount Halimun Salak National Park, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 2020, no. 21(3), pp. 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210336
2. Anderson D., De Souza J. The Importance and Meaning of Prayer Rituals at the End of Life. British Journal of Nursing, 2021, no. 30(1), pp. 34–39. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.1.34
3. Asteria D., Alvernia P., Kholila B.N., Husein S.I., Asrofani F.W. Forest Conservation by the Indigenous Baduy Community in the Form of Customary Law. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2024, no. 14(2), pp. 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-12-2020-0171
4. Baynes J., Herbohn J., Smith C., Fisher R., Bray D. Key Factors Which Influence the Success of Community Forestry in Developing Countries. Global Environmental Change, 2015, no. 35(4), pp. 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011
5. Berhane A.T. Indigenous Knowledge of Me’en Community Toward Natural Resource Conservation: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis. An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 2024, no. 20(1), pp. 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801241231638
6. Bouphapanya S., Hongsuwan P. Trees in Lao Myths and Beliefs: Roles and Symbolic Ecological Meanings Through the Aspects of Folklore. Journal of Ecohumanism, 2024, no. 3(4), pp. 834–845. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3590
7. Brondízio E.S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y., Bates P., Carino J., Fernández-Llamazares Á., Ferrari M.F., Shrestha U.B. Locally Based, Regionally Manifested, and Globally Relevant: Indigenous and Local Knowledge, Values, and Practices for Nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2021, no. 46(1), pp. 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127
8. Cadman T., Maraseni T., Koju U.A., Shrestha A., Karki S. Forest Governance in Nepal Concerning Sustainable Community Forest Management and Red Panda Conservation. Land, 2023, no. 12(2), p. 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020493
9. Candiotto L.Z.P., Leite M.D.C. Agroforestry Systems on Brazilian Legal Protected Lands: Permanent Preservation Areas (PPA) and Legal Reservation Areas (LRA). Asian Journal of Geographical Research, 2023, no. 6(1), pp. 15–34. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajgr/2023/v6i1172
10. Causadias J.M. What Is Culture, Systems of People, Places, and Practices. Developmental Science, 2020, no. 24(4), pp. 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1789360
11. Christmas S.K., Hardiyanti M., Prawira S.A. Role in the Forest Village CommunityBased Forest Management Sustainable Development. Journal of Judicial Review, 2021, no. 23(1), pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4387
12. Claridge L., Kobei D. Protected Areas Indigenous Rights and Land Restitution: The Ogiek Judgment of the African Court of Human and Peoples' Rights and Community Land Protection in Kenya. Oryx, 2023, no. 57(3), pp. 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605322000989
13. Cogné M., Lescuyer G. The Role of Agroforestry in Farmers' Strategies and Its Contribution to the Well-Being of Rural People in Timor-Leste. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 2024, no. 33(1), pp. 42–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2023.2298986
14. Cottet M., François A., Moreau C., Lecaude C., Vukelic S., Rivière H.A., Evette A. Knowledge Influences Perceptions and Values of Nature-Based Solutions: The Example of Soil and Water Bioengineering Techniques Applied to Urban Rivers. Anthropocene, 2024, no. 45(22), pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2024.100424
15. De Foresta H., Kusworo A., Michon G., Djatmiko A. When a Garden Looks Like a Forest: Typical Indonesian Agroforest – Society Contribution for Sustainable Development. Bogor, International Center for Research in Agroforestry; Paris, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Jakarta, Ford Foundation, 2000.
16. De Pater C., Verschuuren B., Elands B., van Hal I., Turnhout E. Spiritual Values in Forest Management Plans in British Columbia and the Netherlands. Forest Policy and Economics, 2023, no. 51(2), p. 102955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102955
17. Dmuchowski W., Baczewska-Dąbrowska A.H., Gworek B. The Role of Temperate Agroforestry in Mitigating Climate Change: A Review. Forest Policy and Economics, 2024, no. 159, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103136
18. Erbaugh J.T. Responsibilization and Social Forestry in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019, no. 109, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019
19. Fa J.E., Watson J.E.M., Leiper I. Importance of Indigenous Peoples' Lands for the Conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2020, no. 18, pp. 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2148
20. Febryano I.G., Sari Y.P., Herwanti S., Bintoro A. Planting Patterns in Rubber Agroforestry (Hevea brasiliensis) Developed by the Communities of Menggala Mas Village, Lampung Province, Indonesia. Folia Forestalia Polonica, 2024, no. 66(1), pp. 33–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2024-0004
21. Haggar J., Pons D., Saenz L., Vides M. Contribution of Agroforestry Systems to Sustaining Biodiversity in Fragmented Forest Landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, no. 283, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.06.006
22. Gould R.K., Soares T.M., Arias-Arévalo P., Cantú-Fernandez M., Baker D., Eyster H.N., Kwon R., Prox L., Rode J., Suarez A., Vatn A., Zúñiga-Barragán J. The Role of Value(s) in Theories of Human Behavior. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2023, no. 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101355
23. Gunawan R., Febryano I.G., Bantara I., Yuwono S.B. Social Engineering in the Implementation of Forest and Land Rehabilitation in Girimulyo Village, Lampung Province. Jurnal Belantara, 2024, no. 7(1), pp. 111–125. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbl.v7i1.969
24. Harakan A., Pelizzo R., Kuzenbayev N. Traditional Beliefs and Electoral Behavior in Indonesia. World Affairs, 2023, no. 186(4), pp. 896–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200231203005
25. Harly L.N.B. Sustainable Forest Management from the Perspective of Customary Law in Indonesia: A Case Study in the Bayan Community. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2023, no. 1(1), pp. 32–42. https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v1i1.324
26. Herwanti S., Febryano I.G., Zulfiani D. Economic Value Analysis of Community Forest Food Products in Ngarip Village, Ulu Belu Subdistrict, Tanggamus Regency (A Case from Indonesia). Forestry Ideas, 2019, no. 25(2), pp. 314–328. https://doi.org/10.30598/jhppk.2016.1.2.105
27. Huang L., Jin C., Pan Y., Zhou L., Hu S., Guo Y., Lindenmayer D.B. Human Activities and Species Biological Traits Drive the Long-Term Persistence of Old Trees in Human-Dominated Landscapes. Nature Plants, 2023, no. 9(6), pp. 898–907. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01412-1
28. Istiawati N.F., Susilo S., Ruja I.N., Widodo S. Construction of Krui Community Knowledge on Repong Damar Culture in Lampung's West Coast. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, no. 412(1), p. 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/412/1/012005
29. Janaki M., Pandit R., Sharma R.K. The Role of Traditional Belief Systems in Conserving Biological Diversity in the Eastern Himalaya Eco-region of India. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2021, no. 26(1), pp. 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2020.1781982
30. Jiao W., Yang X., Li Y. Traditional Knowledge's Impact on Soil and Water Conservation in Mountain Agricultural Systems: A Case Study of Shexian Dryland Stone Terraced System, China. Ecological Indicators, 2024, no. 159, p. 111742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111742
31. Kapelari S., Alexopoulos G., Moussouri T., Sagmeister K.J., Stampfer F. Food Heritage Makes a Difference: The Importance of Cultural Knowledge for Improving Education for Sustainable Food Choices. Sustainability, 2020, no. 12(4), p. 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041509
32. Kiss B., Sekulova F., Hörschelmann K., Salk C.F., Takahashi W., Wamsler C. Citizen Participation in the Governance of Nature Based Solutions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2022, no. 32(3), pp. 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1987
33. Koentjaraningrat. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta, Rineka Cipta Publ., 2015. 391 p. (In Indonesian).
34. Kuang F., Jin J., He R., Ning J., Wan X. Farmers' Livelihood Risks, Livelihood Assets and Adaptation Strategies in Rugao City, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, no. 264, p. 110463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110463
35. Lam D.P., Hinz E., Lang D.J., Tengö M., von Wehrden H., Martín-López B. Indigenous and Local Knowledge in Sustainability Transformations Research: A Literature Review. Ecology & Society, 2020, no. 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11305-250103
36. Laura C.T., Darmawan A., Hilmanto R. Repong Damar Cover Detection in the Pesisir Barat of Lampung Using Satellite Remote Sensing Imagery. Jurnal Hutan Tropis, 2019, no. 7(3), pp. 247–260. https://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jht.v7i3.7511
37. Leduc G., Hansson H. Behavioural Factors for Farmers' Adoption of Agroforestry Practices in Sweden. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2024, no. 47, pp. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.03.023
38. Lee S.M., Kim Y.S., Jaung W., Latifah S., Afifi M., Fisher L.A. Forests, Fuelwood and Livelihoods: Energy Transition Patterns in Eastern Indonesia. Energy Policy, 2015, no. 85, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.030
39. Luo Y., Li Y., Li C., Wu Q. Influence of the Kinship Networks on Farmers' Willingness to Revitalize Idle Houses. Sustainability, 2023, no. 15(13), p. 10285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310285
40. Marini G.V., Healey J.R., Wong J.L., Stara K., Tsiakiris R., Halley J.M. When Nature Meets the Divine: Effect of Prohibition Regimes on the Structure and Tree Species Composition of Sacred Forests in Northern Greece. Web Ecology, 2020, no. 20(2), pp. 53–86. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-20-53-2020
41. Maura M.C.B.P., Iswandaru D., Kuswandono, Fitriana Y.R., Rohman F. Analysis of Community Knowledge on the Conservation of White-Winged Duck (Asarcornis scutulata) in Way Kambas National Park. Jurnal Belantara, 2024, no. 7(1), pp. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbl.v7i1.1035
42. Mir M.A.M., Shelley B., Ooi C.S. Uses of Tourism Resources for Educational and Community Development: A Systematic Literature Review and Lessons. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2024, no. 53, p. 101278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101278
43. Maulidyna A., Hartawan B.S., Agustin H.N., Irfan A.N., Septiasari A., Utina R., Setyawan A.D. The Role of Local Belief and Wisdom of the Bajo Community in Marine Conservation Efforts. International Journal of Bonorowo Wetlands, 2021, no. 11(1), pp. 50– 63. https://doi.org/10.13057/bonorowo/w110105
44. McGrath D.G., Castello L., Almeida O.T., Estupinan G.M.B. Market Formalization, Governance, and the Integration of Community Fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon. Society & Natural Resources, 2015, no. 28, pp. 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1014607
45. Megeirhi H.A., Woosnam K.M., Ribeiro M.A., Ramkissoon H., Denley T.J. Employing a Value-Belief-Norm Framework to Gauge Carthage Residents' Intentions to Support Sustainable Cultural Heritage Tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020, no. 28(9), pp. 1351–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1738444
46. Noor M., Fan J.B., Zhang J.X., Zhang C.J., Sun S.N., Gan L., Yan X.B. Effects of Shade Stress on Growth and Responsive Mechanisms of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023, no. 42(7), pp. 4037–4047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10920-5
47. Nugraha L.M., Hakim L., Abdoellah O.S., Darmawan A., Winarno B. SocioEcological Effect of Transition Landscape Dynamics From Agroforests to Monoculture Plantation in Upper Citarum Watershed. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2024, no. 12(2), pp. 279–295. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i2.813
48. Panda L.R., Uniyal A., Kukreti J., Singh N. The Role of Non-Timber Forest Products for Livelihood Diversification in Bundelkhand Region of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Economic Plants, 2024, no. 11(1), pp. 70–78. https://doi.org/10.23910/2/2024.5005
49. Pearson J., Jackson G., McNamara K.E. Climate-Driven Losses to Knowledge Systems and Cultural Heritage: A Literature Review Exploring the Impacts on Indigenous and Local Cultures. The Anthropocene Review, 2023, no. 10(2), pp. 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196211005482
50. Pieper M. Technology as a Strategy of the Human? A Comparison Between the Extension Concept and the Fetish Concept of Technology. Philosophy & Technology, 2024, no. 37(1), p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00697-0
51. Prigioniero A., Zuzolo D., Niinemets Ü., Guarino C. Nature-Based Solutions as Tools for Air Phytoremediation: A Review of the Current Knowledge and Gaps. Environmental Pollution, 2021, no. 277, p. 116817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116817
52. Rahayu S., Laraswati D., Permadi D.B., Sahide M.A.K., Maryudi A. Only a Noise? The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Policy Processes of a New Social Forestry Model in Indonesia. Small-Scale Forestry, 2022, no. 22(2), pp. 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09525-9
53. Redding G. Societal Knowledge Quality as Catalyst for the Competitive Productivity of Technology: One in a Set of Several Universal Processes in Trajectories of Societal Progress. International Business Review, 2023, no. 32(6), p. 102096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102096
54. Rivero R.M., Mittler R., Blumwald E., Zandalinas S.I. Developing ClimateResilient Crops: Improving Plant Tolerance to Stress Combination. The Plant Journal, 2022, no. 109(2), pp. 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15483
55. Roslinda E., Prisila F.W., Mariani Y. The Patterns of Agroforestry and Its Contribution to the Community Income. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2023, no. 11(3), pp. 543–557. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v11i3.749
56. Roux J.L., Konczal A.A., Bernasconi A., Bhagwat S.A., De Vreese R., Doimo I., Winkel G. Exploring Evolving Spiritual Values of Forests in Europe and Asia: A Transition Hypothesis Toward Re-spiritualizing Forests. Ecology & Society, 2022, no. 27(4), pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-13509-270420
57. Rozaki Z., Rejeki T.M., Rahayu L., Ramli M.F. Farmers' Food Security in Forest and Peatland Fires Prone Areas of South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2023, no. 11(3), pp. 527–542. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v11i3.770
58. Samrin S., Millang S., Ridwan Daud M. Land productivity and land equivalent ratio of agroforestry system in Marena Customary Forest, Enrekang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2024, no. 12(2), pp. 532–548. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i2.877
59. Shiferaw A., Hebo M., Senishaw G. The spiritual ecology of sacred landscapes: Evidence from sacred forests of the Sebat Bête Gurage, Central-South Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 2023, no. 9(1), pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2210900
60. Sharma A., Thakur D., Uniyal S.K. Taboos: aboos: Traditional beliefs and customs for resource management in the Western Himalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 2021, no. 20(2), pp. 575–581. https://doi.org/10.56042/ijtk.v20i2.29346
61. Singh H.B., Yaipharembi N., Huidrom E., Devi C.A. Traditional Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices Associated with Ethnic People of Manipur, North East India in Conservation of Biodiversity. Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Resource Management in Asia. Cham, Springer International Publ., 2023, pp. 61–75.
62. Sinthumule N.I. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Its Role in Biodiversity Conservation: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, no. 11, p. 1164900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1164900
63. Sinthumule N.I. Challenges Facing Traditional Ecological Knowledge in the Vhembe District Municipality in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2024, no. 10, p. 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101027
64. Song B., Robinson G.M., Bardsley D.K., Xue Y., Wang B. Multifunctional Agriculture in a Peri-Urban Fringe: Chinese Farmers' Responses to Shifts in Policy and Changing Socio-Economic Conditions. Land Use Policy, 2023, no. 133, p. 106869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106869
65. Suyitno I., Pratiwi Y., Andajani K., Arista H.D. The Cultural Meaning in Ritual Traditions for the Character of Osing People Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Qualitative Report, 2023, no. 28(7), pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6156
66. Tarun M.T.G., Gumiran I.G., Peñaflor B.L. Cultivating Multifaceted Participation in the Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) Program in Communities of Northern Isabela. American Journal of Environment and Climate, 2024, no. 3(2), pp. 91–105. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v3i2.3262
67. Varghese J., Crawford S.S. A Cultural Framework for Indigenous, Local, and Science Knowledge Systems in Ecology and Natural Resource Management. Ecological Monographs, 2020, no. 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1431
68. Yeshey P., Ford R.M., Keenan R.J., Nitschke C.R. Religious Beliefs and Wildlife Value Orientations Influence Tolerance of Wildlife Impacts in Bhutan. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2024, no. 29(3), pp. 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2023.2234389
69. Wibowo N., Harianto S.P., Dewi B.S., Febryano I.G. Integration of Local Technology in Damar Damar Harvesting: Case Study of Harvesting Culture in Pahmungan Village, Lampung. Makila, 2024, no. 18(2), pp. 325–337. https://doi.org/10.30598/makila.v18i2.15410
70. Williams P.A., Sikutshwa L., Shackleton S. Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches – Lessons From a Systematic Review. Land, 2020, no. 9(33), pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9090331
71. Wulandari C., Rahmawaty, Putra E.T.S., Isnurdiansyah, Rahayu S. Agroforestri Damar Mata Kucing di Lampung dan Agroforestri Kemenyan di Sumatra Utara: Kearifan lokal yang mendukung keberlanjutan penghidupan masyarakat dan lingkungan. Agroforestry Nusantara, 2023, vol. 1. Bogor, World Agroforestry (ICRAF). 180 p. (In Indonesian).
72. Yudistira R., Nurcaya N., Julhadi J., Pattiasina P.P.J. The Role of Linguistics and Local Wisdom on Knowing Harmony Between Religions at Tana Toraja. Muslim Heritage, 2022, no. 7(2), pp. 409–431. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v7i2.5023
73. Zas R., Quiroga R., Touza R., Vázquez-González C., Sampedro L., Lema M. Damar Tapping Potential of Atlantic Maritime Pine Forests Depends on Tree Age and Timing of Tapping. Industrial Crops and Products, 2020, no. 157, p. 112940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112940
74. Zhang J., Basso B., Price R.F., Putman G., Shuai G. Estimating Plant Distance in Maize Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). PLOSONE, 2018, no. 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195223
75. Zhao X., Elahi E., Wang F., Xing H., Khalid Z. Sustainable Tourism Development for Traditional Chinese Drama's Intangible Cultural Heritage. Heliyon, 2024, no. 10(3), e25483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25483