Forestry Measures in Shelterbelts of the Krasnodar Territory. P. 185–192

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.6MB )

UDС

630*581.55(470.620)

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2024-4-185-192

Abstract

In the process of growth and development of forest belts, some of their taxation characteristics and design change. Forest reclamation complexes are subject to homeostasis. Changing the design of shelterbelts leads to crop shortages, loss of profits for agricultural organizations, as well as to the deterioration of the ecology of field soils. A way out of this situation can be found in the application of a system of measures, an important part of which is forestry measures. The aim of the research has been to determine the timing and types of forestry measures aimed at improving the agro-ecological efficiency of protective forest reclamation complexes on agricultural lands of the Krasnodar Territory. Data from the 2019 inventory of protective forest plantations and data obtained by the authors in 2015–2021 in the Kushchevskij and Leningradskij Districts of the Krasnodar Territory have been used. According to the data obtained, graphs of the dependence of stock on the age and height have been constructed for some tree species of field protection forest reclamation complexes. It has been established that in the study area the largest number of areas of shelterbelts have a dense structure – 538.5 ha, and 501.7 ha of them are trees of the III age class. A significant increase in the stock of plantations has been noted at the age of: Robinia pseudoacacia L. – 15 years, Fraxinus excelsior L. – 25 years, Gleditsia triacanthos L. – 10 years, Ulmus pumila L. – 35 years. The equations of the regressional dependence of stock on the age and height for the main tree species have been obtained. These equations can be used to predict the timing of forestry measures in order to maintain the openwork design of forest belts recommended for the region under study.

Authors

Nikolay V. Primakov^1,2*, Candidate of Agriculture, Assoc. Prof.;
ResearcherID: ABD-8930-2021, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-024X
Vadim V. Tanyukevich³, Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: AAG-2488-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-6835

Affiliation

¹Kuban State University, ul. Stavropol’skaya, 149, Krasnodar, 350040, Russian Federation; nik-primakov@yandex.ru*
²Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, ul. Kalinina, 13, Krasnodar, 350044, Russian Federation; nik-primakov@yandex.ru*
³Don State Agrarian University, ul. Krivoshlykova, 24, pos. Persianovskij, Oktyabrskij District, Rostov Region, 346493, Russian Federation; vadimlug79@mail.ru

Keywords

forest belt design, shelterbelt, forestry measures, tree species, reclamation, reclamation efficiency, the Krasondar Territory

For citation

Primakov N.V., Tanyukevich V.V. Forestry Measures in Shelterbelts of the Krasnodar Territory. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2024, no. 4, pp. 185–192. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2024-4-185-192

References

1. Vlasova N.S., Khorolskaya T.E. Analysis and Prospects for the Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex of the Krasnodar Territory. Vestnik Akademii znanij = Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 2020, no. 40(5), pp. 104–109. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2304-6139-2020-10600

2. Gribacheva O.V., Chernodubov A.I., Sotnikov D.V. Dynamics of Height Range Distribution of Trees in the Forest Shelter Belt with Participation of English Oak (Quercus robur L.) and Norway Maple (Acer platanoides L.). Lesotekhnicheskij zhurnal = Forestry Engineering Journal, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1(37), pp. 15–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2020.1/2

3. Zheldak V.I., Proka I.Yu. Improvement of Systems of Silvicultural Activities for Forests of a Certain Species Composition. Lesokhozyajstvennaya informatsiya = Forestry Information, 2021, no. 4, pp. 38–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2021.4.03

4. Mikhin V.I., Mikhina E.A. Features of Formation of Protective Plantings from a Birch Hanging in the Central Forest-Steppe of Russia. Lesotekhnicheskij zhurnal = Forestry Engineering Journal, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4(36), pp. 41–49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2019.4/5

5. On the State of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the Krasnodar Territory in 2020: Report. Krasnodar, Ministry of Natural Resources of the Krasnodar Territory, 2021. 447 p. (In Russ.).

6. Sukhanovskij Yu.P., Oleshitskij V.V. Method for Determining the Optical Density of a Wind Barrier and the Openwork Pattern of Forest Strips. Patent RF no. RU 2285389 C2, 2006. (In Russ.).

7. Postolov V.D., Kruglyak V.V. Role of Agricultural Forest Recreation Measures in Protecting Soils from Degradation. Modeli i tekhnologii prirodoobustrojstva (regional’nyj aspect) = Models and Technologies Environmental Engineering (Regional Aspect), 2021, no. 1(12), pp. 13–17. (In Russ.).

8. Primakov N.V. Variability of Silvicultural Characteristics of Forest Shelterbelts in Krasnodar Krai. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2021, no. 1, pp. 60–68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2021-1-60-68

9. Rulev A.S., Ruleva O.V., Suchkov D.K. Soil and Taxation Assessment of Modular Protective Forest Strips. Lesokhozyajstvennaya informatsiya = Forestry Information, 2021, no. 1, pp. 83–92. (In Russ.).

10. Safronova T.I., Sokolova I.V. Justification of the Land and Security System Increases in Agroresource Potential Agrolandscapes. International Agricultural Journal, 2020, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 84–92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0209-2020-10185

11. Simakov G.A. Development of the Agro-industrial Complex in the Krasnodar Territory. Molodoj uchenyj = Young Scientist, 2017, no. 29(163), pp. 59–61. (In Russ.).

12. Tanyukevich V.V., Rulev A.S., Borodychev V.V., Tyurin S.V., Khmeleva D.V., Kvasha A.A. Productivity and Environmental Role of Forest Shelterbelts of Robinia pseudoacacia L. of the Kuban Lowland. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2020, no. 6, pp. 88–97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2020-6-88-97

13. Tubalov A.A. Map Making, Assessment of the State, Typification of Agroforest Landscapes – Solution of Basic Scientific Tasks under Adaptive – Landscape Agroforest Reclamation Development of Areas. Prirodoobustrojstvo = Environmental Engineering, 2019, no. 5, pp. 50–56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34677/1997-6011/2019-5-50-56

14. Bao Y., Li H., Zhao H. Effect of Shelterbelts on Winter Wheat Yields in Sanded Farmland of North-Western Shandong Province, China. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2012, vol. 10, iss. 3–4, pp. 1399–1403. https://doi.org/10.1234/4.2012.3695

15. Bastida F., Zsolnay A., Hernández T., García C. Past, Present and Future of Soil Quality Indices: A Biological Perspective. Geoderma, 2008, vol. 147, iss. 3–4, pp. 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.08.007

16. Baude M., Meyer B.C., Schindewolf M. Land Use Change in an Agricultural Landscape Causing Degradation of Soil Based Ecosystem Services. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, vol. 659, pp. 1526–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.455

17. Félix G.F., Scholberg J.M.S., Clermont-Dauphin C., Cournac L., Tittonell P. Enhancing Agroecosystem Productivity with Woody Perennials in Semi-Arid West Africa: a Meta-Analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2018, vol. 39, art. no. 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0533-3

18. Juang J.-Y., Zhang J.-C., Yang Y., Zhang B., Li J. Effect of Forest Shelter-Belt as a Regional Climate Improver along the Old Course of the Yellow River, China. Agroforestry Systems, 2017, vol. 91, pp. 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9928-9

19. Karabutov A.P., Tyutyunov S.I., Solovichenko V.D. Biologization – Strategic Basis of the Agriculture in the Central Black Soil Region of the Russian Federation. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 2019, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 1427–1432.

20. Saint-Laurent D., Berthelot J.S., Gervais-Beaulac V. Habitat Fragmentation and Structure and Composition of Tree Populations in a Agroforestry Landscape (Southern Québec, Canada). Agroforestry Systems, 2018, vol. 92, pp. 1517–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0099-0