Address: 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk 163002 Russian Federation. Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov. Office 1425
Phone / Fax: (818-2) 21-61-18 Archive |
These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Gennady N. Kolesnikov, Olga I. Grigoreva, Igor V. Grigorev, Valentin A. Makuev, Tamara N. Storodubtseva, Victoria V. Shvetsova Complete text of the article:Download article (pdf, 2MB )UDС630*2(075)DOI:10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-100-113AbstractThe interaction between wind loads and forest plantations has been fairly well understood. A large amount of valuable scientific and practical information has been obtained and published so far in this field. There are some known data on wind load damage to plantations, its effect on their growth, and the ability of forest plantations to reduce wind speed and force. Nevertheless, the issues of wind impact on both individual trees and forested areas remain relevant. Analysis of the literature and Internet resources showed that the research has left out the issue of the wind load impact on the grown wood quality. Multi-year observations and a wind rose created using these observations enable the determination of the prevailing wind strength and direction for each area. Knowing the features of the wind load impact on the quality of timber after logging, it is possible to predict the percentage of the yield of commercial and low-quality wood, and to purposefully influence this parameter in plantation forest growing by setting out the planting material in accordance with these data. The article shows the developed method for theoretical estimation of the probability of occurrence of critical bark deformations in the compressed zone, which appears when bending a growing tree due to wind load. Classical studies of the critical state of compressed rods on an elastic base were used as the theoretical basis of the method. A part of growing tree bark plays the role of a rod, while cambium and other living cells between the bark and the trunk wood play the role of the elastic base. A correlation simple enough for practical application is proposed in order to obtain quantitative estimates. Adequacy of the modeling results is confirmed by their consistency with the experimental data. The application of the developed methodology is shown on the examples.AuthorsGennady N. Kolesnikov1, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: A-1553-2014,ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-0264Olga I. Grigoreva2, Candidate of Agriculture, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: AAC-9570-2020, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-0813 Igor V. Grigorev3*, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: S-7085-2016, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-1725 Valentin A. Makuev4, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: AAD-2903-2020,ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-8923 Tamara N. Storodubtseva5, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.; ResearcherID: ACF-4424-2022, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4925-8542 Victoria V. Shvetsova6, Candidate of Engineering; ResearcherID: AAC-3395-2021, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-2326 Affiliation1Petrozavodsk State University, prosp. Lenina, 33, Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, 185910, Russian Federation; kgn@petrsu.ru2Saint-Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, Saint Petersburg, 194021, Russian Federation; grigoreva_o@list.ru 3Arctic State Agrotechnological University, 3-y km, 3, sh. Sergelyakhskoye, Yakutsk, 677007, Russian Federation; silver73@inbox.ru* 4Mytischi Branch of Bauman Moscow State Technical University, ul. 1-ya Institutskaya, 1, Mytischi, Moscow Region, 141005, Russian Federation; makuev@mgul.ac.ru 5Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov, ul. Timiryazeva, 8, Voronezh, 394087, Russian Federation; tamara-tns@yandex.ru Keywordswind load on a tree, wind load on a plantation, wind load impact on wood quality, bark deformations, target forest cultivation, modeling of deformationsFundingThe authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable insights and comments made by colleagues at the Scientific School “Innovations in Logging Industry and Forestry” in the preparation of this paper.For citationKolesnikov G.N., Grigoreva O.I., Grigorev I.V., Makuev V.A., Storodubtseva T.N., Shvetsova V.V. Modeling of Critical Local Deformations of Growing Tree Bark under Wind Loads. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 5, pp. 100–113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-100-113References1. Vol’mir A.S. Stability of Deformable Systems. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967. 984 p.2. Gerts E.F., Urazova A.F., Kurdysheva E.V., Urazov P.N. Effectiveness of Protective Forest Strips along the Railway. Vestnik ASAU, 2021, no. 1(1), pp. 56–60. 3. Glukhikh V.N., Chernykh A.G. Reasoning of Tree Cross Sections Oval Shaping while Growing with an Inclination. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2020, no. 5,pp. 166–175. https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2020-5-166-175 4. Grigorjeva O.I., Grigorjev I.V., Davtyan A.B., Ivanov V.A., Grinko O.I., Shvabo va N.V., Kalita A.Yu. Influence of Wind Load on the Formation of Defects in Growing Trees. Systems. Methods. Technologies, 2021, no. 2(50), pp. 63–69. https://doi.org/10.18324/2077-5415-2021-2-63-69 5. Kunitskaya O.A., Nikitina E.I. Ecological Aspects of Shelterwood Cutting. Ecological, Economic and Technological Issues of Sustainable Development of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation: Collection of Academic Papers of the III International Scientific and Technical Conference “Minsk Scientific Readings-2020”: In 3 Vol. Minsk, BelSTU Publ., 2021, vol. 1, pp. 286–291. 6. Kunitskaya O.A., Shvetsova V.V., Tikhonov E.A. Modern Wooden Shipbuilding in Russia. Remont. Vosstanovlenie. Modernizatsiya = Repair. Recovery. Modernization, 2021, no. 6, pp. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.31044/1684-2561-2021-0-6-3-12 7. Kunitskaya O.A., Kolesnikov G.N., Lukin A.E., Grigorev I.V. Improving the Effi ciency of Group Debarking of Long-Cut Timber. Petrozavodsk, PetrSU Publ., 2016. 107 p. 8. Nikitina T.A., Shestakov Yu.D., Labudin B.V., Kunitskaya O.A., Tikhonov E.A., Kali ta A.Yu. Strength Resource of Larch Wood of the White Sea North under Compression in the Main and Diagonal Axes of Anisotropy. Derevoobrabativaushaya promishlennost’ = Wood working industry, 2020, no. 4, pp. 21–31. 9. Tambi A.A., Yurkova O.V., Kunitskaya O.A., Stepanishcheva M.V. Research of the Influence of the Physical Properties and Structure of Pine Wood on Its Strength. Systems. Methods. Technologies, 2017, no. 4(36), pp. 157–161. https://doi.org/10.18324/2077-5415-2017-4-157-161 10. Tsyvin M.M. The Use of Tree Bark. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1973.94 p. 11. Chahal A., Ciolkosz D. A Review of Wood-Bark Adhesion: Methods and Me chanics of Debarking for Woody Biomass. Wood and Fiber Science, 2019, vol. 51, no. 3,pp. 288–299. https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2019-027 12. Falťan V., Katina S., Minár J., Polčák N., Bánovský M., Maretta M., Zámečník S., Petrovič F. Evaluation of Abiotic Controls on Windthrow Disturbance Using a Generalized Additive Model: A Case Study of the Tatra National Park, Slovakia. Forests, 2020, vol. 11, iss. 12, art. 1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121259 13. Gaffrey D., Kniemeyer O. The Elasto-Mechanical Behaviour of Douglas Fir, Its Sensitivity to Tree-Specific Properties, Wind and Snow Loads, and Implications for Stability – A Simulation Study. Journal of Forest Science, 2002, vol. 48, no. 2, pр. 49–69. https://doi.org/10.17221/11856-JFS 14. Kärhä K., Anttonen T., Poikela A., Palander T., Laurén A., Peltola H., Nuutinen Y. Evaluation of Salvage Logging Productivity and Costs in Windthrown Norway Spruce-Dom inated Forests. Forests, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 5, art. 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050280 15. Krišāns O., Matisons R., Kitenberga M., Donis J., Rust S., Elferts D., Jansons Ā. Wind Resistance of Eastern Baltic Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth.) Suggests Its Suit ability for Periodically Waterlogged Sites. Forests, 2021, vol. 12, iss. 1, art. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010021 16. Kunickaya O., Runova E., Chzhan S., Zhuk A., Markov O., Garus I., Nikiforova V., Ivanov V. Improving Impregnation Techniques for Fine Coniferous and Non-Coniferous Wood. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 2020, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 520–528. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-27654 17. Kunickaya O., Tanyukevich V., Khmeleva D., Kulik A., Runova E., Savchenkova V., Voronova A., Lavrov M. Cultivation of the Targeted Forest Plantations. Journal of Envi ronmental Treatment Techniques, 2020, vol. 8, iss. 4, pp. 1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.47277/JETT/8(4)1393 18. Kunickaya O.A., Shadrin A.A., Burmistrova O.N., Markov O.B., Gasparyan G.D., Davtyan A.B., Lapshina M.L., Sleptsova N.A., Ustinova V.V., Kruzhilin S.N. Wood Treat ment with Hydro Impact: A Theoretical and Experimental Study. Bulgarian Journal of Agri cultural Science, 2019, vol. 25, suppl. 2, pp. 158–166. 19. Kunickaya O.A., Shadrin A.A., Kremleva L.V., Mueller O.D., Ivanov V.A., Bederdinova O.I., Kruchinin I.N., Burgonutdinov A.M., Zakharova O.I., Struchkov N.A. Modeling of the Processes of the Modification of the Current Volume Warming by Drainage and Pressing. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2019, vol. 25, suppl. 2, pp. 167–177. 20. Mayr S., Bertel C., Dämon B., Beikircher B. Static and Dynamic Bending Has Mi nor Effects on Xylem Hydraulics of Conifer Branches (Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris). Plant, Cell & Environment, 2014, vol. 37, iss. 9, рр. 2151–2157. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12307 21. Morkovina S.S., Kunickaya O., Dolmatova L., Markov O., Nguyen V.L., Baranova T., Shadrina S., Grin’ko O. Comparative Analysis of Economic Aspects of Growing Seedlings with Closed and Open Root Systems: The Experience of Russia. Asian Journal of Water, En vironment and Pollution, 2021, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 19–26. 22. Peltola H., Kellomäki S., Hassinen A., Granander M. Mechanical Stability of Scots Pine, Norway Spruce and Birch: An Analysis of Tree-Pulling Experiments in Finland. For est Ecology and Management, 2000, vol. 135, iss. 1-3, рр. 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0378-1127(00)00306-6 23. Trockenbrodt M. Survey and Discussion of the Terminology Used in Bark Anatomy.IAWA Bulletin, 1990, vol. 11(2), рр. 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000511 24. Urquiza Muñoz J.D., Magnabosco Marra D., Negrón-Juarez R.I., Tello-Espinoza R., Alegría-Muñoz W., Pacheco-Gómez T., Rifai S.W., Chambers J.Q., Jenkins H.S., Bren ning A., Trumbore S.E. Recovery of Forest Structure Following Large-Scale Windthrows in the Northwestern Amazon. Forests, 2021, vol. 12, iss. 6, art. 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060667 25. Wenig C., Dunlop J.W.C., Hehemeyer-Cürten J., Reppe F.J., Horbelt N., Krau thausen K., Fratzl P., Eder M. Advanced Materials Design Based on Waste Wood and Bark. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2021, vol. 379, iss. 2206, art. 20200345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0345 |
Make a Submission
Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2024" INDEXED IN:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|