Address: 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk 163002 Russian Federation. Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov. Office 1425
Phone / Fax: (818-2) 21-61-18 Archive |
These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Mikhail D. Merzlenko, Petr G. Melnik, Anna A. Kozhenkova Complete text of the article:Download article (pdf, 0.6MB )UDС630*232DOI:10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-37-46AbstractThe range of European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) covers Central Europe, while in Podmoskovie this species grows out of its natural distribution area. In plantings this species is known for its fast growth, stability, good soil and water protection properties, and high wood quality. All larch species in the Moscow region have a positive reputation in terms of high adaptability, they are often more productive than the local coniferous forest-forming species. Similar results were obtained by foresters in Central and Eastern Europe. The increment in stock in a number of Polish larch populations at the age of 50–60 years can reach 10–15 m3/ha per year, that is why this wood species is widely used in silvicultural practice in these countries. The research aims at studying the growth and productivity of European larch climatypes outside its natural habitat. The research covered experimental sites of European larch introduction located in the territory of the center of the Russian Plain within the Moscow region. Of all the European larch climatypes, the Polish larch has the highest growth rates in height and diameter, as well as in the accumulation of trunk stock. It forms stands with very large trunks and has an increased value of soil-light basic increment in diameter of the trunks. The Polish larch is superior to the European larch of Sudeten origin in terms of silvicultural effect. As a result, Polish larch has undeniable advantages among all the reviewed provenances in terms of growth rate and accumulation of trunk wood reserves, which is a strong argument in the issue of its expanded introduction as a promising conifer for target reforestation. European larch from Scotland has the worst growth and productivity. On the whole, all climatypes of European larch successfully adapt to the conditions of the center of the Russian Plain and are superior to all local coniferous forest-forming species in terms of inventory characteristics.AuthorsMikhail D. Merzlenko1, Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: J-1359-2016, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-3178Petr G. Melnik1,2*, Candidate of Agriculture, Assoc. Prof., Senior Research Scientist; ResearcherID: E-7644-2014, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2802-7614 Anna A. Kozhenkova3, Candidate of Agriculture, Assoc. Prof., Research Scientist; ResearcherID: AAN-2228-2021, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1518-7165 Affiliation1Institute of Forest Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Sovetskaya, 21, s. Uspenskoye, Moscow Region, 143030, Russian Federation; md.merzlenko@mail.ru2Mytischi Branch of Bauman Moscow State Technical University, ul. 1-ya Institutskaya, 1, Mytishchi, Moscow Region, 141005, Russian Federation; melnik_petr@bk.ru* 3Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Botanicheskaya, 4, Moscow, 127276, Russian Federation; kozhenkova_anna@mail.ru
Keywordsintroduction, European larch, climatype, provenance, forest plantations, biogroups, larch growth, silvicultural effect, Moscow region, Polish larchFor citationMerzlenko M.D., Melnik P.G., Kozhenkova A.A. Introduction of European Larch Climatypes in the Mixed Forest Zone. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 5, pp. 37–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-37-46References1. Bagaev S.S. The Studies of Larch Climatypes in the Southern Taiga Raion of European Part of Russia. Forestry information, 2015, no. 2, рр. 35–45.2. Besschetnov V.P., Besschetnova N.N., Esichev A.O. Physiological State Evalu ation of Representatives of the Genus Larch (Larix Mill.) in the Nizhny Novgorod Re gion. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2018, no. 1, pp. 9–17. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2018.1.9 3. Iroshnikov A.I. Larches of Russia. Biodiversity and Breeding. Moscow, VNIILM Publ., 2004. 182 p. 4. Isachenko Kh.M. Forestation Experience in the Central Regions of the European Part of the USSR. Moscow, Goslesbumizdat Publ., 1957. 112 p. 5. Karasev N.N. Increasing the Productivity of Forests in the Moscow Region through the Introduction of Larch: Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs. Moscow, 2009. 21 p. 6. Koreshkov N.V., Tsareva E.A. Larch Provenance Trial Plantations. Saint Petersburg, Naukoyemkiye tekhnologii Publ., 2021. 414 p. 7. Kurnaev S.F. Forest-Growing Zoning of the USSR. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 203 р. 8. Melnik L.P. Natural Regeneration of European Larch Outside Natural Area with Min imum of Seed Trees. Lesnoy vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2021, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.18698/2542-1468-2021-6-39-44 9. Melnik P.G., Merzlenko M.D., Lobova S.L. The Results of Growing Larch Climatic Types in the Provenance Trial Plantations in the North-East of the Moscow Region. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University, 2016, no. 2(136), pp. 62–67. 10. Merzlenko M.D., Melnik P.G. Experience of Silvicultural Monitoring in Nicholskaya Lesnaya Dacha. Moscow, MGUL Publ., 2015. 112 p. 11. Merzlenko M.D., Melnik P.G., Kozhenkova A.A. Growth Results of Larch Climotypes in Geographical Plantations of the Western Part of the Moscow Region. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University, 2018, no. 1(159), pp. 72–77. 12. Nakvasina E.N., Barabin A.I., Tikhonov P.R., Eliseev A.A. Larch in the Arkhangelsk Re gion: Biology, Variability, and Conservation. Arkhangelsk, ASTU Publ., 2008. 216 p. 13. Polyakov A.N. Forest Crops of K.F. Turmer in the Moscow and Vladimir Regions.Forestry information, 1995, no. 4, pp. 15–29. 14. Rubtsov M.V., Merzlenko M.D. Forest Crops of K.F. Turmer. Moscow, TsBNTIlesk hoz Publ., 1975, iss. 14. 42 p. 15. Sukachev V.N. On the History of the Development of Larch Trees. Forestry: Collec tion of Papers. Ed. by M.E. Tkachenko. Moscow, Novaya derevnya Publ., 1924, pp. 12–44. 16. Timofeev V.P. Larch in Plantation. Moscow, Goslestekhizdat Publ., 1947. 296 p. 17. Timofeev V.P. The Role of Larch in Raising the Forest Productivity. Moscow, AN SSSR Publ., 1961. 160 p. 18. Timofeev V.P. Nature and Plantations of the Forest Experimental Dacha of the Timiry azev Agricultural Academy for 100 years. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1965. 168 p. 19. Timofeev V.P. The Experience of Growing European Larch in the Moscow and Neigh boring Regions. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 1971, no. 12, pp. 21–27. 20. Timofeev V.P. Forest Crops of Larch. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1977.216 p. 21. Tupik P.V., Rebko S.V. Selection of European Larch for Seed Productivity. Proceed ings of BSTU, 2015, no. 1(174), pp. 170–173. 22. Shtukin S.S., Volovich P.I., Klysh A.S. Safety and Efficiency of Polish Larch For est Cultures Created on the Uprooted Glade. Proceedings of BSTU, 2015, no. 1(174), pp. 107–110. 23. Yablokov A.S. Larch Plantation and Care of Stands. Moscow, Goslestekhizdat Publ., 1934. 128 p. 24. Debryniuk Iu., Belelya S. Variety of Forms and Vitality of the Larch in the Stands of Western Polissia. Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2016, iss. 14,pp. 117–125. 25. Lewandovski A. Modrzew polski (L. decidua Mill. subsp. polonica (Racib.) Domin): struktura genetyczna populacji oraz jego pochodzenie w swietle badan izoenzy mowych. Kornik, 1995. 72 p. 26. Lewandovski A., Burczyk J. Mating System and Genetic in Natural Population of European Larch (Larix decidua) and Store Pine (Pinus cembra) Located at Higher Elevation. Silvae Genetica, 2000, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 158–161. 27. Matras J. Badania proweniencyjne modrzewia prowadzone przez Instytut Badaw czy Leśnictwa w latach 1948–2000. Prace Instytutu Badawczego Leśnictwa. Seria A, 2001, no. 908-912, pp. 41–63. 28. Melnik L.P. Dissemination and Natural Regeneration Dynamics of Larch in Ni kolskaya Forest Estate. 56th Student’s Scientific International Conference. Slovak Republic, Technical University in Zvolen, 2015, pp. 1213–1223. 29. Melnik P.G., Karasyov N.N. Productivity of Different Larch Types in Moscow Region. Eurasian Forests – Hungarian Forests: Materials of the VI International Conference of Young Scientists. Moscow, MSUF Publ., 2006, pp. 83–85. 30. Schober R. Ergebnisse von Lärchen – Art Provenienzversuchen. Silvae Genetica, 1958, vol. 5, pp. 137–154. |
Make a Submission
Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2024" INDEXED IN:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|