Address: 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk 163002 Russian Federation. Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov. Office 1425
Phone / Fax: (818-2) 21-61-18 Archive |
These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. O.N. Tyukavina, D.N. Klevtsov, N.A. Babich Complete text of the article:Download article (pdf, 0.6MB )UDС582.4:581.1DOI:DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2017.1.73AbstractThe pine needle length is characterized by strong volatility due to various external and in-ternal factors. The needles are very responsive to the changes of environmental conditions, to any human impact. On the branches the needles have different length in dependence of the year. Moreover, the abnormally long and short needles are marked in different years. The coincidence of dynamics peaks of needle length does not depend on the forest type, age (for example, pine trees in the southern taiga subzone), stand density and drainage intensity (for example, drained shrub-sphagnum pine forests). Comparing our study data with the literature information we can state, that the dynamics of needle length according to years 82is not dependent on growing conditions, area, and the researcher. The years of anomalously large needle length are in the analyzed series: 1963, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2004; the years of abnormally low values of needle length are in the analyzed series: 1965, 1994, 1997, 2003, 2006. Consequently, a global factor, which is equivalent in the southern and northern taiga, which does not dependent on the climate indicators, age of crops, competition in it, affects on the abnormal needle length. That factor is the solar activity. To mitigate the effects of exposure of microclimatic and edaphic factors, the needle length index is calculated by the smoothing method using the 3–6 years (depending on the needle lifetime) average value. We carried out the sampling of average monthly values of solar activity, expressed by the Wolf number, for years with synchronous abnormally long and short needle length. A more complete understanding of the significance of the factors we observed in their analysis for 24 months: before and during the anomalistic years. The biggest difference between the in-dices of the Wolf numbers is typical for the period of formation of abnormal needle length, compared with a year preceding the needles development. During the development of ab-normally long needle length the Wolf numbers exceed the average value by 1.7 times; in the years of abnormally short needles the Wolf number is by 2–5 times lower than the average in the analyzed series. Consequently, the solar activity affects the growth of needles and causes the synchronization of peaks in the needle length dynamics. AuthorsO.N. Tyukavina, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor D.N. Klevtsov, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor N.A. Babich, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, ProfessorAffiliationNorthern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation; е-mail: olga-tukavina@yandex.ru, d.klevtsov@narfu.ru, 1n.babich@narfu.ruKeywordsneedle length, needle length index, Wolf number, solar activity, Scots pineFor citationTyukavina O.N., Klevtsov D.N., Babich N.A. The Similarity of the Needle Length Dynamics on an Annual Basis of Scots Pine Growth in Different Conditions. Lesnoy zhurnal [Forestry journal], 2017, no. 1, pp. 73–85. DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2017.1.73References1. Babich N.A., Klevtsov D.N., Evdokimov I.V. Zonal'nye zakonomernosti izmeneniya fitomassy kul'tur sosny [Zonal Patterns of Change in the Pine Phytomass]. Arkhangelsk, 2010. 140 p. 2. Babich N.A., Merzlenko M.D., Evdokimov I.V. Fitomassa kul'tur sosny i eli v evropeyskoy chasti Rossii [Phytomass of Pine and Spruce in the European Part of Russia]. Arkhangelsk, 2004. 112 p. 3. Bazilevich N.I., Titlyanova A.A., Smirnov V.V., Rodin L.E., Nechaeva N.T., Lev-in F.I. Metody izucheniya biologicheskogo krugovorota v razlichnykh prirodnykh zonakh [Meth-ods of the Biological Cycle Studying in Different Natural Zones]. Moscow, 1978. 183 p. 4. Kazimirov N.I., Volkov A.D., Zyabchenko S.S., Ivanchikov A.A., Morozova R.M. Obmen veshchestv i energii v sosnovykh lesakh Evropeyskogo Severa [Metabolism and Energy Change in the Pine Forests of the European North]. Leningrad, 1977. 304 p. 5. Kamenetskaya I.V. Izmenenie massy i morfologii khvoi raznykh vozrastov v kronakh sosny obyknovennoy (Pinus sylvestris L.) po godam v raznykh tipakh lesa [The Weight and Morphology Change of Needles of Different Ages in the Crowns of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) on an Annual Basis in Different Types of Forests]. Produktivnost' i struktura molodykh sosnyakov [Productivity and the Structure of Young Pine Stands]. Moscow, 1973, pp. 63–86. 6. Kishchenko I.T. Sezonnyy rost sosny v razlichnykh usloviyakh mestoproizrastani-ya v svyazi s temperaturnym rezhimom vozdukha i pochvy [Seasonal Growth of Pine in Various Growing Conditions in Relation to the Air and Soil Temperature Regime]. Formi-rovanie produktivnykh sosnovykh nasazhdeniy Karel. ASSR i Murmanskoy oblasti [For-mation of Productive Pine Plantations in the Karelian ASSR and Murmansk Region]. Petro-zavodsk, 1978, pp. 12–30. 7. Kishchenko I.T. Sezonnyy rost khvoi sosny v raznykh tipakh lesa Yuzhnoy Karelii [Seasonal Growth of Pine Needles in Different Forest Types in South Karelia]. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 1978, no. 2, pp. 29–32. 8. Kovalev A.G. Vliyanie intensivnosti sveta na anatomo-morfologicheskoe stroenie khvoi sosny [The Influence of Light Intensity on the Anatomical and Morphological Structure of Pine Needles]. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 1983, no. 1, pp. 29–34. 9. Kovalev A.G., Antipova O.V. Rost khvoi sosny obyknovennoy pri raznoy osvesh-chennosti [The Growth of Scots Pine Needles at Different Illumination]. Lesovedenie [Rus-sian Journal of Forest Science], 1984, no. 6, pp. 22–28. 10. Kondrat'ev P.S. Zakonomernosti formirovaniya otdel'nykh vegetativnykh organov dereva v raznykh tipakh lesa i v raznykh zonakh evropeyskoy chasti SSSR: avtoref. diss. … kand. s.-kh. nauk [Laws of Formation of Separate Vegetative Tree Organs in Different For-est Types and Different Zones of the European Part of the USSR: Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss. Abs.]. Moscow, 1961. 22 p. 11. Konovalov V.N., Zarubina L.V. Ekologo-fiziologicheskie osobennosti khvoynykh na osushaemykh zemlyakh [Ecological and Physiological Characteristics of Conifers on Drained Lands]. Arkhangelsk, 2010. 295 p. 12. Kostin N.V., Presnukhin Yu.V., Tumashevich T.Ya. Razmery i massa khvoi sosny obyknovennoy v svyazi s proizvoditel'nost'yu nasazhdeniy [Dimensions and Weight of Needles of Scots Pine in Connection with the Performance of Plantations]. Modelirovanie lesnykh biogeotsenozov [Modeling of Forest Ecosystems]. Petrozavodsk, 1986, pp. 99–105. 13. Kravchenko G.L. Zakonomernosti rosta sosny [Patterns of Pine Growth]. Mos-cow, 1972. 168 p. 14. Molchanov A.A. Gidrologicheskaya rol' sosnovykh lesov na peschanykh poch-vakh [The Hydrological Role of Pine Forests on Sandy Soils]. Moscow, 1952. 54 p. 15. Nadutkin V.D., Modyanov A.N. Nadzemnaya fitomassa drevesnykh rasteniy v sosnyakakh zelenomoshnykh [The Aboveground Phytomass of Woody Plants in the Moss Pine Forests]. Voprosy ekologii sosnyakov Severa: Tr. Komi filiala AN SSSR [The Issues of Pine Forests Ecology of the North: Proc. Komi Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR]. Syktyvkar, 1972, no. 24, pp. 70–80. 16. Nakvasina E.N. Assimilyatsionnyy apparat kak pokazatel' adaptatsii sosny obyknovennoy k izmeneniyu klimaticheskikh usloviy proizrastaniya [Assimilation Appa-ratus as a Factor of Scotch Pine Adaptation to a Change of Growth Climatic Conditions]. Lesnoy zhurnal, 2009, no. 3, pp. 12–19. 17. Nikolaevskiy V.S. Ekologicheskaya otsenka zagryazneniya sredy i sostoyaniya nazemnykh ekosistem metodami fitoindikatsii [Environmental Assessment of Environmental Pollution and the State of Terrestrial Ecosystems by the Phytoindication Methods]. Moscow, 1989. 65 p. 18. Ogievskiy V.V., Khirov A.A. Obsledovanie i issledovanie lesnykh kul'tur [Sur-vey and Research of Forest Crops]. Leningrad, 1967. 50 p. 19. Onuchin A.A., Spitsyna N.T. Zakonomernosti izmeneniya massy khvoi v khvoynykh drevostoyakh [Laws of Change of the Needles Mass in the Conifer Stands]. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 1995, no. 5, pp. 48–58. 20. Patov A.I. Sezonnaya dinamika rosta nadzemnykh organov sosny i eli [Seasonal Dynamics of Growth of Above-Ground Organs of Pine and Spruce]. Kompleksnye bioge-otsenologicheskie issledovaniya khvoynykh lesov Evropeyskogo Severo-Vostoka [Complex Holocoenotic Research of Coniferous Forests of the European North-East]. Syktyvkar, 1985, no. 73, pp. 15–24. 21. Popov V.Ya. O nekotorykh ekologo-morfologicheskikh priznakakh sos-ny razlichnogo proiskhozhdeniya v Arkhangel'skoy oblasti [Some Ecological and Morphologi-cal Features of Pine of Different Origin in the Arkhangelsk Region]. Lesnoy zhurnal, 1965, no. 2, pp. 15–16. 22. Pravdin L.F. Sosna obyknovennaya. Izmenchivost', vnutrividovaya sistematika i selektsiya [Pine. Variability, Intraspecific Taxonomy and Selection]. Moscow, 1964. 190 p. 23. Rodin A.R., Merzlenko M.D. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po izucheniyu lesnykh kul'tur starshikh vozrastov [Guidelines for the Study of Old Age Forest Plantations]. Mos-cow, 1983. 36 p. 24. Rubtsov V.G., Knize A.A. Zakladka i obrabotka probnykh ploshchadey v osu-shennykh nasazhdeniyakh [Establishing and Treating of Sample Plots in Drained Stands]. Leningrad, 1977. 42 p. 25. Sayt Glavnoy (Pulkovskoy) astronomicheskoy observatorii. 2015 [The Site of the Main (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory. 2015]. Available at: www.gao.spb.ruwww.gao. spb.ru. 26. Serebryakov I.G. Ekologicheskaya morfologiya rasteniy [Ecological Plant Mor-phology]. Moscow, 1962. 378 p. 27. Smirnov V.V. Organicheskaya massa v nekotorykh fitotsenozakh evropeyskoy chasti SSSR [Organic Mass of Some Plant Communities in the European Part of the USSR]. Moscow, 1971. 362 p. 28. Smirnov V.V. Sezonnyy prirost glavneyshikh drevesnykh porod [The Seasonal Increase of the Most Important Tree Species]. Moscow, 1964. 167 p. 29. Sokolov N.N. Metodicheskie ukazaniya k diplomnomu proektirovaniyu po taksatsii probnykh ploshchadey [Guidelines for Degree Designing on Inventory of Plots]. Arkhangelsk, 1978. 44 p. 30. Torlopova N.V., Robakidze E.A. Vliyanie pollyutantov na khvoynye fitotsenozy (na primere Syktyvkarskogo lesopromyshlennogo kompleksa) [The Effect of Pollutants on Coniferous Plant Communities (for Example, the Syktyvkar Timber Industry)]. Yekaterin-burg, 2003. 146 p. 31. Utkin A.I. Biologicheskaya produktivnost' lesov [Biological Productivity of the Forests]. Lesovedenie i lesovodstvo, 1975, vol. 1, pp. 9–10. 32. Feklistov P.A., Babich N.A. Biometricheskie pokazateli assimilyatsionnogo ap-parata kul'tur sosny [Biometric Indicators of the Assimilation Apparatus of Pine]. Ekologiya i zashchita lesa [Ecology and Forest Protection]. Leningrad, 1990, pp. 56–59. 33. Feklistov P.A., Biryukov S.Yu. Sezonnyy rost sosen skruchennoy i obyknovennoy v severnoy podzone taygi [Seasonal Growth of Shore Pine and Scotch Pine in the Northern Taiga Subzone]. Lesnoy zhurnal, 2006, no. 6, pp. 24–29. 34. Feklistov P.A., Evdokimov V.N., Barzut V.M. Biologicheskie i ekologicheskie osobennosti rosta sosny v severnoy podzone evropeyskoy taygi [Biological and Ecological Characteristics of Pine Growth in the Northern Subzone of the European Taiga]. Arkhan-gelsk, 1997. 140 p. 35. Feklistov P.A., Tyukavina O.N. Osobennosti assimilyatsionnogo apparata, vod-nogo rezhima i rosta derev'ev sosny v osushennykh sosnyakakh [Features of the Assimila-tion Apparatus, Water Regime and Pine Growth in Reclaimed Pine Forests]. Arkhangelsk, 2014. 179 p. 36. Tsvetkov V.F., Nikonov V.V. Struktura i zapasy fitomassy khvoi v sosnovykh molodnyakakh Kol'skogo poluostrova [The Structure and Needle Phytomass Stocks in Pine Young Forests in the Kola Peninsula]. Lesovedenie [Russian Journal of Forest Science], 1985, no. 1, pp. 32–39. 37. Chizhevskiy A.P., Shishina Yu.G. V ritme solntsa [In the Rhythm of the Sun]. Moscow, 1969. 112 p. 38. Borgman E.M., Schoettle A.W., Angert A.L. Assessing the Potential for Mala-daptation during Active Management of Limber Pine Populations: a Common Garden Study Detects Genetic Differentiation in Response to Soil Moisture in the Southern Rocky Moun-tains. Canadian J. of Forest Research, 2015, vol. 45, iss. 4, pp. 496–505. 39. Ballarin-Denti A., Cocucci S.M., Di Girolamo F. Environmental Pollution and Forest Stress: a Multidisciplinary Approach Study on Alpine Forest Ecosystems. Chemo-sphere, 1998, no. 36, pp. 1049–1054. 40. Helmisaari H.S. Spatial and Age-Related Variation in Nutrient Concentration of Pinus sylvestris Needles. Silva Fennica, 1992, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 145–153. 41. Herrero A., Zamora R. Plant Responses to Extreme Climatic Events: a Field Test of Resilience Capacity at the Southern Range Edge. PLoS ONE, 2014, vol. 9(1), pp. 136–147. 42. Hou?kov? K., Mauer O. Vliv V?choz? Hustoty Sazenic Na Morfologickou Kvalitu Nadzemn? ??sti Borovice Lesn? (Pinus sylvestris L.) 8 Let Po V?sadb? [Initial Den-sity of Transplants and Its Effect on the Morphological Quality of Scots Pine (Pinus syl-vestris I.) Above-Ground Part Eight Years after Planting]. Zpravy Lesnickeho Vyzkumu [Re-ports of Forestry Research], 2014, vol. 59(2), pp. 117–125. 43. Jankowski K., Sosnowski J., Wilk A., Malinowska E., Wi?niewska-Kadzajan B. Effect of Growth Regulators on Selected Morphological Features of Yellow Pine. J. of Eco-logical Engineering, 2014, vol. 15(4), pp. 105–108. 44. Junttila O., Heide O.M. Shoot and Needle Growth in Pinus sylvestris as Related to Temperature in Northern Fennoscandia. Forest Science, 1981, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 423–430. 45. Li Z., Wang Y., Liu Y., Guo H., Li T., Li Z.-H., Shi G. Long-Term Effects of Liming on Health and Growth of a Masson Pine Stand Damaged by Soil Acidification in Chongqing, China. PLoS ONE, 2014, vol. 9(4), pp. 245–254. 46. McDonald P.M., Skinner C.N., Fiddler G.O. Ponderosa Pine Needle Length: An Ear-ly Indicator of Release Treatment Effectiveness. Can. J. For. Res., 1992, vol. 22, pp. 761–764. 47. Nikoli? B., Bojovi? S., Marin P.D. Morpho-Anatomical Traits of Pinus Peuce Nee-dles from Natural Populations in Montenegro and Serbia. Plant Biosystems, 2015, vol. 150(5), pp. 1038–1045. 48. Primicia I., Imbert J.B., Traver M.C., Castillo F.J. Inter-Specific Competition and Management Modify the Morphology, Nutrient Content and Resorption in Scots Pine Nee-dles. European J. of Forest Research, 2014, vol. 133(1), pp. 141–151. 49. Simple Key to the Pines. A Continuation of the Bulletin of Popular In-formation of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard university, 1951, vol. 11(9), pp. 63–70. 50. Wood P.J. Sampling Systems to Assess Variability in the Needles of Twelve Mexican Pines. New Phytologist, 1972, vol. 71(5), pp. 925–936. Received on January 16, 2016 The Similarity of the Needle Length Dynamics on an Annual Basis of Scots Pine Growth in Different Conditions |
Make a Submission
Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2024" INDEXED IN:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|