Evaluation of the Accuracy of Wood Drilling Resistance Measurement Method in Dendrochronological Studies. P. 135–150

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.9MB )

UDС

674.038.1:620.179.1

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2023-5-135-150

Abstract

One of the promising methods for determining physical and mechanical properties and structure of wood is the method based on the measurement of drilling resistance. Limitations of application of the method of measuring drilling resistance in dendrochronological studies are related to a number of factors that have a significant impact on the accuracy of determining the variation of physical and mechanical properties of wood within annual layers: the depth of drilling, its direction relative to the fibers, and the speed parameters of the drilling process. In order to assess the accuracy of measuring the radial growth of pine wood (Pinus sylvestris L.) with moisture content of 6–8 %, the ResistYX device and standard thin drill bits were used. On the basis of comparative analysis of radial wood growth determined by the optical method and the method of measuring resistance to drilling, it was found that in order to obtain accurate data on growth with a correlation coefficient greater than 0.7, it is recommended to measure no more than 17 annual layers on one sample, which corresponds to an average total width of annual layers of 36.6 mm. The influence of the main reasons for the decrease in the accuracy of radial growth determination by the drilling resistance measurement method was studied: geometrical parameters of the cutting part of a thin drill bit, deviation of the drilling direction from the specified one, impossibility of precise determination of the strictly radial drilling direction, wood flaws, as well as friction of the drill shank when the drilling depth increases. To increase the accuracy of the method of measuring drilling resistance in dendrochronological studies it is proposed to develop a method including the use of a special or newly developed tool for more accurate determination of the core and radial drilling of wood or round timber; to increase the rigidity of the thin drill bit; to provide the required fixation of the thin drill bit during its initial contact with wood and inside the device. Further studies in this direction will be associated with the assessment of measuring accuracy for the radial growth of coniferous wood by the feeding force for drill bit penetration.

Authors

Vasilii Yu. Chernov*, Candidate of Engineering, Assoc. Prof.;
ResearcherID: X-4439-2019, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-7340
Evgenii S. Sharapov, Doctor of Engineering, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: B-8151-2014, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6500-5377
Ilschat G. Gaisin, Candidate of Engineering, Assoc. Prof.; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-1342

Affiliation

Volga State University of Technology, Lenina pl., 3, Yoshkar-Ola, 424000, Russian Federation; chernovvy@volgatech.net, SharapovES@volgatech.net, GaisinIG@volgatech.net

Keywords

annual layers of wood, dendrochronological studies, drilling resistance profile, optical method, thin drill bit, measurement accuracy, drilling resistance measurement method, ResistYX

For citation

Chernov V.Yu., Sharapov E.S., Gaisin I.G. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Wood Drilling Resistance Measurement Method in Dendrochronological Studies. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 5, pp. 135–150. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-5-135-150

References

1. Almetov A.N. Improving the Design of a Drill for Extracting Wood Cores from Growing Trees of Various Species: Cand. Eng. Diss. Mari State Technical University. Yoshkar-Ola, 2001. 174 p. (In Russ.).

2. Demakov J.P., Nureeva Т.V. Group and Individual Variability of Annual Tree Height Growth in Pine Plantations of Mari Transvolga Region. Volga State University of Technology Bulletin. Forest. Ecology. Nature Management, 2019, no. 3, iss. 43, pp. 25–45. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25686/2306-2827.2019.3.25

3. Kolesnikova A.A. Research of Wood Properties by Increment Cores. Yoshkar-Ola, Mari State Technical University Publ., 2002. 178 p. (In Russ.).

4. Matveev S.M., Rumyancev D.E. Dendrochronology: Voronezh, Voronezh State Academy of Forestry Engineering Publ. 2013. 139 p. (In Russ.).

5. Sharapov E.S., Chernov V.Yu., Bychkova T.V. Device for Drilling Resistance Measurements. Pаtent RF, no. RU 95128, 2010. (In Russ.).

6. Chernov V.Yu., Sharapov E.S., Smirnova E.V., Solovieva O.A. Device for Drilling Resistance Measurements. Patent RF, no. RU 2607064, 2017. (In Russ.).

7. Rumyantsev D.E. History and Methodology of Silvicultural Dendrochronology. Moscow, Moscow State Forest University Publ. 2010. 109 p. (In Russ.).

8. Sharapov E.S., Chernov V.Yu., Smirnova E.V. Certificate on State Registration of the Computer Program no. 2016662108 «ResistVIEW, 1.0», 2016. (In Russ.).

9. Chernov V.Yu., Sharapov E.S., Toropov A.S. Evaluation of Wood Density Using the Drilling Resistance Measurement Method. Yoshkar-Ola, Volga State University of Technology Publ. 2019. 200 p. (In Russ.).

10. Chernov V.Yu., Sharapov E.S., Toropov A.S., Smirnova E.V., Pavlov D.A. The Accuracy of Wood Density Evaluation by Drilling Resistance Measurements. Proceedings of the third International Conference “Current problems and prospects for the development of the timber industry”, Kostroma State Technological University. Kostroma, Russian Federation, 2015, pp. 42–45. (In Russ.).

11. Chernyh N.B. Dendrochronology and Archeology. Moscow, Nox Publ. 1996. 212 p. (In Russ.).

12. Sharapov E.S. Improvement of Methods and Tools for Quasinondestructive Evaluation of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood and Wood materials: Doc. Tech. Sci. Diss. Arkhangelsk, Northern (Arctic) Federal University, 2019. 340 p. (In Russ.).

13. Sharapov E.S., Smirnova E.V. Evaluation of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood by the Drilling Resistance Measurement. Volga State University of Technology Bulletin. Materials. Constructions. Technologies, 2019, no. 4, iss. 12, pp. 120–134. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25686/2542-114X.2019.4.120.

14. Shiyatov S.G., Vaganov E.A., Kirdyanov A.V., Kruglov V.B., Mazepa V.S., Naurzbaev M.M., Hantemirov R.M. Methods of Dendrochronology. Part 1. Fundamentals of Dendrochronology. Collecting and Obtaining Tree-ring Information. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State University Publ., 2000. 80 p. (In Russ.).

15. Chantre G., Rozenberg P. Can Drill Resistance Profiles (Resistograph) Lead to Within-profile and Within-ring Density Parameters in Douglas-fir Wood? Proceedings of CTIA – International Union of Forestry Research Organizations (IUFRO). International Wood Quality Workshop: Timber Management Toward Wood Quality and End-Product Value. Forintek Canada Corp., Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada, 1997, pp. 41–47.

16. Guller B., Guller A., Kazaz G. Is Resistograph an Appropriate Tool for the Annual Ring Measurement of Pinus Brutia? Proceedings of the International Conference NDE Safety. Czech Republic, 2012, pp. 89–94.

17. Kraler А., Beikircher W., Zingerl Ph. Suitability of Drill Resistance Measurements for Dendrochronological Determination. World Conference on Timber Engineering, Strength and Serviceability – Etreme Events. Aucklande, New Zealand, 2012, vol. 2. 302 p.

18. Kraler А., Beikircher W., Zingerl Ph. Strength Determination of Aged Wood, From 1250AD to Present, with Nondestructive and Semidestructive Test Methods. World Conference on Timber Engineering, Strength and Serviceability – Etreme Events. Aucklande, New Zealand, 2012, vol. 2, 188 p.

19. Mattheck C., Bethge K., Albrecht W. How to Read the Results of Resistograph M. Arboricultural Journal: The International Journal of Urban Forestry, 1997, vol. 21, iss. 4, pp. 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1997.9747179

20. Nutto L., Biechele T. Drilling Resistance Measurement and the Effect of Shaft Friction – Using Feed Force Information for Improving Decay Identification on Hard Tropical Wood. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL – GTR – 239. Proceedings of the 19th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. 22–25 September 2015, 2015, pp. 154–161.

21. Oliveira J.T.S., Wang X., Vidaurre G. Assessing Specific Gravity of Young Eucalyptus Plantation Trees Using a Resistance Drilling Technique. Holzforschung, 2017, vol. 71, iss. 2, pp. 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2016-0058

22. Orozco-Aguilar L., Nitschke C.R., Livesley S.J., Brack C., Johnstone D. Testing the Accuracy of Resistance Drilling to Assess Tree Growth Rate and the Relationship to Past Climatic Conditions. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, vol. 36, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.010

23. Pressler M.R. Der Forstliche Zuwachsbohrer [The forestry increment borer]. Tharander Jahrbuch. Arnoldische Buchhandlung, Leipzig. Dritte Abtheilung III, 1866, pp. 137–209. (In Germ).

24. Rinn F., Schweingruber F.H., Schar E. Resistograph and X-ray Density Charts of Wood Comparative Evaluation of Drill Resistance Profiles and X-ray Density Charts of Different Wood Species. Holzforschung, 1996, vol. 50, iss. 4, pp. 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1996.50.4.303

25. Rinn F. Resistographic Visualization of Tree Ring Density Variations. Proceedings of the International Conference Tree Rings and Environment. Tucson, AZ, USA, Radiocarbon, 1996, pp. 871–878.

26. Sharapov E., Brischke C., Militz H. Effect of Grain Direction on Drilling Resistance Measurements in Wood. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2021, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1766158

27. Sharapov E., Wang X., Smirnova E. Drill Bit Friction and its Effect on Resistance Drilling Measurements in Logs. Proceedings of the 20th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, 12–15 September 2017, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, 2017, pp. 405–415.

28. Sharapov E., Brischke C., Militz H., Smirnova E. Prediction of Modulus of Elasticity in Static Bending and Density of Wood at Different Moisture Contents and Feed Rates by Drilling Resistance Measurements. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 2019, vol. 77, pp. 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-019-01439-2

29. Schimleck L., Dahlen J., Apiolaza L.A., Downes G., Emms G., Evans R., Moore J., Pâques L., Bulcke J.V., Wang X. Non-destructive Evaluation Techniques and What They Tell Us About Wood Property Variation. Forests, 2019, vol. 10, iss. 728. 50 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090728

30. Tannert T., Anthony R., Kasal B., Kloiber M., Piazza M., Riggio M., Rinn F., Widmann R., Yamaguchi N. In-situ Assessment of Structural Timber using Semi-destructive Techniques. Materials and Structures, 2014, vol. 47, pp. 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0094-5

31. Wang S.Y., Chiu C.M., Lin C.J. Application of the Drilling Resistance Method for Annual Ring Characteristics: Evaluation of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomeribides) Trees Grown with Different Thinning and Pruning Treatments. Journal of Wood Science, 2003, vol. 49, iss. 2, pp. 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100860300018

32. Wang S.Y., Lin C.J. Application of the Drill Resistance Method for Density Boundary Evaluation of Earlywood and Latewood of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides Hay.) Plantation Wood. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 2001, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 196–199.