![]() Address: Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov, office 1425
Phone: +7 (8182) 21-61-18 Lesnoy Zhurnal |
K.S. Bolotova, D.G. Chukhchin, L.V. Mayer, A.A. Gur'yanova Complete text of the article:Download article (pdf, 0.8MB )UDС539.25 + 547.992.3DOI:10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.6.153AbstractThe authors made a comparison of the micromorphological structure and obtained a statisti-cally significant size distribution of plant and bacterial cellulose microfibrils. Morphological features of the microfibrils structure were studied using a SEM Sigma VP ZEISS scanning electron microscope and an ACM Multimod 8 Bruker atomic-force microscope. The image informativity of the least degree of the microfibrils deformation was achieved by cleaving of the timber sample, which detected the individual fibrils or their bundles. We applied the hemicellulose hydrolysis by briefly heating the wood in the water up to temperature 164of 235 °C to disclose the ligno-hemicellulosic matrix, distorting the image of wood microfi-brils in the pictures. Bacterial cellulose images were obtained without a prior sample prepa-ration. The cross-sectional dimensions of microfibrils did not depend on the cell wall layer, where they were localized, and were virtually the same for woody and herbaceous annual plants (with a mean of 27 nm for juniper). The cross-sectional size of microfibrils of bacte-rial cellulose was 34 nm at an average without a strict orientation of elements of the supra-molecular structure. It was also typical for one of the main structural parts of the plant cell wall – a primary wall. The bimodal nature of the size distribution curve of bacterial cellu-lose microfibrils demonstrated the microfibrils ability to the parallel placing. Taking into consideration the statistically close size distribution of cellulose microfibrils of plant and bacterial origin, and a similar crystal structure of the samples, we can assume the presence of identical stages of biosynthesis of the S2 layer in plants and bacterial cellulose. AuthorsK.S. Bolotova, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor D.G. Chukhchin, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor L.V. Mayer, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor A.A. Gur'yanova, MasterAffiliationNorthern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation,е-mail: k.bolotova@narfu.ru Keywordsmicrofibril, bacterial cellulose, Acetobacter xylinum, scanning electron micro-scope, atomic-force microscope.For citationBolotova K.S., Chukhchin D.G., Mayer L.V., Gur’yanova A.A. Morphological Features of the Fibrillar Structure of Plant and Bacterial Cellulose, Lesnoy zhurnal (Forestry journal), 2016, no. 6, pp. 153–165. DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.6.153References1. Azarov V.I., Burov A.V., Obolenskaya A.V. Khimiya drevesiny i sinteticheskikh polimerov [Chemistry of Wood and Synthetic Polymers]. St. Petersburg, 1999. 628 p. 2. Aleshina L.A., Glazkova S.V., Lugovskaya L.A., Podoynikova M.V., Fofanov A.D., Silina E.V. Sovremennye predstavleniya o stroenii tsellyuloz (obzor) [Current Ideas about the Cellulose Structure]. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya [Chemistry of Plant Raw Mate-rial], 2001, no. 1, pp. 5–36. 3. Bogolitsyn K.G., Chukhchin D.G., Zubov I.N., Gusakova M.A. Ul'tramikrostroenie i nadmolekulyarnaya struktura drevesnoy matritsy [Ultra-Microstructure and Submolecular Structure of the Wood Matrix]. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya [Chemistry of Plant Raw Material], 2012, no. 3, pp. 37–44. 4. Bolotova K.S., Chukhchin D.G., Manakhova S.V., Mayer L.V., Vinogradova V.R. Sravnitel'naya kharakteristika raspredeleniya razmera mikrofibrill rastitel'noy i bakterial'noy tsellyulozy [Comparative Characteristics of the Microfibrils Size Distribution of Plant and Bacterial Cellulose]. Fizikokhimiya rastitel'nykh polimerov: materialy VI Mezhdunar. konf., Arkhangel'sk, 2-3 iyunya 2015 g. [Physical Chemistry of Plant Polymers: Proc. 6th Intern. Conf. Arkhangelsk, 2-3 June, 2015]. Arkhangelsk, 2015, pp. 55–58. 5. Gorshkova T.A. Rastitel'naya kletochnaya stenka kak dinamichnaya sistema [The Plant Cell Wall as a Dynamic System]. Moscow, 2007. 426 p. 6. Malkov A.V., Chukhchin D.G., Bolotova K.S., Tyshkunova I.V., Novozhilov E.V. Novyy podkhod k difraktometricheskomu opredeleniyu stepeni kristallichnosti tsellyulozy [New Approach to the Diffractometric Cellulose Crystallinity Determination]. Fizikokhimi-ya rastitel'nykh polimerov: materialy VI Mezhdunar. konf., Arkhangel'sk, 2-3 iyunya 2015 g. [Physical Chemistry of Plant Polymers: Proc. 6th Intern. Conf. Arkhangelsk, 2-3 June, 2015]. Arkhangelsk, 2015, pp. 201–205. 7. Rogovin Z.A. Khimiya tsellyulozy [Cellulose Chemistry]. Moscow, 1972. 520 p. 8. Chukhchin D.G., Mayer L.V., Manakhova S.V., Ivanchenko N.L. Otsenka poperechnykh razmerov mikrofibrill tsellyulozy v sloe S2 kletochnoy stenki drevesiny [Es-timation of the Cross-Sectional Dimensions of Cellulose Microfibrils in the S2 Cell Wall Layer of Wood]. Biotekhnologii v khimiko-lesnom komplekse: tez. dokl. Mezhdunar. nauch. konf., Arkhangel'sk, 11-12 sent. 2014 g. [Biotecnologies in Chemical and Timber Complex: Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. Arkhangelsk, 11-12 September, 2014]. Arkhangelsk, 2014, pp. 321–324. 9. Alberts B., Bray D., Lewis J., Raff M., Roberts K., Watson J.D. Molecular Biolo-gy of the Cell. New York, 1986, vol. 3. 311 p. 10. Cavka A., Guo X., Tang S.-J., Winestrand S., Jonsson L.J., Hong F. Production of Bacterial Cellulose and Enzyme from Waste Fiber Sludge. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2013, vol. 6, no. 25, pp. 1–10. 11. Colvin J.R. The Mechanism of Formation of Cellulose-Like Microfibrils in a Cell-Free System from Acetobacter xylinum. Planta, 1980, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 97–107. 12. Evert R.F. Esau’s Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure, Function, and Development. USA, NJ, Hoboken, 2006. 601 p. 13. Hafren J., Fujino T., Itoh T. Changes in Cell Wall Architecture of Differentiating Tracheids of Pinus thunbergii during Lignification. Plant Cell Physiol., 1999, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 532–541. 14. Huang Y., Zhu C., Yang J., Nie Y., Chen C., Sun D. Recent Advances in Bacteri-al Cellulose. Cellulose, 2014, no. 21, pp. 1–30. 15. Lee K.Y., Buldum G., Mantalaris A., Bismarck A. More than Meets the Eye in Bacterial Cellulose: Biosynthesis, Bioprocessing, and Applications in Advanced Fiber Composites. Macromol. Biosci., 2014, no. 14, pp.10–32. 16. Malcolm R., Brown Jr., Saxena I.M. Cellulose: Molecular and Structural Biolo-gy. Selected Articles on the Synthesis, Structure, and Applications of Cellulose. Netherlands, 2007. 379 р. 17. Pear J.R., Kawagoe Y., Schreckengost W.E., Delmer D.P., Stalker D.M. Higher Plants Contain Homologs of the Bacterial CelA Genes Encoding the Catalytic Subunit of Cellulose Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, no. 93, pp. 12637–12642. 18. Pokalwar S.U., Mishra M.K., Manwar A.V. Production of Cellulose by Glu-conacetobacter Sp. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 2010, no. 2(7), pp. 14–19. 19. Saxena I.M., Brown R.M. Cellulose Biosynthesis: Current Views and Evolving Concepts. Ann. Bot., 2005, no. 96, pp. 9–21. 20. R?mling U. Molecular Biology of Cellulose Production in Bacteria. Research in Microbiology, 2002, no. 153, pp. 205–212. Received on July 07, 2016 Morphological Features of the Fibrillar Structure of Plant and Bacterial Cellulose |
Make a Submission
Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2024" INDEXED IN:
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![](/img/transparent.gif)