Address: 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk 163002 Russian Federation. Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov. Office 1425

Phone / Fax: (818-2) 21-61-18
E-mail: forest@narfu.ru
http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/en/

RussianEnglish



Archive

Growth and Condition of the English Oak in the Mixed Stands of Forest Shelterbelts. C. 65-72

Версия для печати
Creative Commons License
These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Aleksey S. Chekanyshkin

Complete text of the article:

Printed copies of the back issues are available in the editorial office of the journal on application to e-mail: forest@narfu.ru. An electronic version of individual issues and articles can be purchased at Rucont.ru.

UDС

582.632.2:634.0.266

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2024-3-65-72

Abstract

An analysis of the creation and operation of protective forest plantations at agricultural enterprises of the Central Chernozem Region allows us to assert that positive ameliorative functions are performed by those forest plantations that have good growth, high stability and longevity. Russian forestry scientists have recognized that the main species in the steppe conditions for all types of protective forest plantations is the English oak. The aim of the research has been to assess the current state of the stands in forest shelterbelts planted via different methods with the English oak as the main species. Taxation works and forest pathology research were carried out in 1997–2021 in the forest shelterbelt no. 9, established in the spring of 1989 by 2-year-old seedlings in the land-use territory of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise Experimental Production Farm “Znamya Oktyabrya” of the Talovskiy District of the Voronezh Region. It has been established that the influence of combinations of tree species in forest belts on the growth of the English oak at the age of 32 years is quite significant. As a result of competitive relations for environmental resources by fast-growing and associate species, the number of live oak trees in a continuous row planting option is 35.6...52.1 % less than in intermittent forest belt options, of their number during planting. The remaining sharply oppressed oak trees in the plantation sown in the continuous row planting way are far behind in height and stem diameter (by 0.8...7.6 m and 4.1...12.7 cm, respectively) compared to the oaks growing in the intermittent forest belts sown in a block planting way. The absence of improvement felling in the experimental plantations during their growth and formation has led to a significant number of dead oak wood and non-viable trees of this species. Moreover, the proportion of dead oak wood and non-viable trees in the forest belt sown via continuous row planting exceeds the indicator in the intermittent forest belts by 36.6...40.6 %. The number of viable oak trees in the intermittent belt options is 17.7...27.3 % higher than in the continuous row planting option, and the number of limitedly viable trees is 11.5...18.9 % higher.

Authors

Aleksey S. Chekanyshkin, Candidate of Agriculture, Leading Research Scientist; ResearcherID: AAK-4197-2021, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7848-2818

Affiliation

Voronezh Federal Agricultural Scientific Centre named after V.V. Dokuchaev, 81, kv-l 5, pos. 2-go uchastka Instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, Talovskiy District, Voronezh Region, 397463, Russian Federation; niish1c@mail.ru

Keywords

English oak, protective forest plantations, mixed stand, method of forest belt creating, forest pathology condition of trees

For citation

Chekanyshkin A.S. Growth and Condition of the English Oak in the Mixed Stands of Forest Shelterbelts. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2024, no. 3, pp. 65–72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2024-3-65-72

References

  1. Anuchin N.P. Forest Inventory. 5th ed., enlarged. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1982. 552 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Artyukhovskiy A.K., Kharchenko N.A., Bykov N.A., Aref’ev Yu.F. Ecological Basics of Forest Protection in Green Areas. Voronezh, VSU Publ., 1994. 128 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Vekshegonov V.Ya. The Chessboard Method of Creating Forest Shelterbelts (From the Experience of Afforestation in the Tselinnyi Territory). Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1965. 84 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Dudarev A.D., Gladysheva N.V., Lozovoy A.D. Methods and Techniques of Work on the Test Areas. Voronezh, 1978. 80 р. (In Russ.).
  5. Klyuchnikov Yu.V. Corridor Method of Planting and Sowing Oak with Fast-Growing Species in Forest Belts. Sovetskaya agronomiya, 1948, no. 8, pp. 52–57. (In Russ.).
  6. Korotun A.M. From the Experience of Planting Large-Sized Material on the Virgin Lands of the Mirzachoʻl Steppe. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 1962, no. 2, pp. 32–36.
  7. Manual on Organization and Management of Forest Pathology Monitoring in the Forests of Russia. Comp. By the Ministry of Natural Resources of the RF and the All-Russian Resarch Institute of Forestry and Forestry Mechanization. Moscow, All-Russian Resarch Institute of Forestry and Forestry Mechanization Publ., 2001. 86 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Pavlovskiy E.S. Diagonal-Group Method of Placing Biogroups When Planting Shelterbelts. Vestnik sel’skokhozyaystvennoy nauki, 1960, no. 5, pp. 120–123. (In Russ.).
  9. Petrov N.G. On the Seasons and Timing of Planting Large-Sized Tree Species. The Collection of Scientific Papers of the Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture of the Central Black Earth Zone Named after V.V. Dokuchaev. Moscow, Rossel’khozizdat Publ., 1965, vol. 3, рp. 277–284. (In Russ.).
  10. Skachkov B.I., Chekanyshkin A.S. A New Direction in the Cultivation of Field Protection and Runoff Control Strips. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii sel’skokhozyaystvennykh nauk, 1992, no. 3, pp. 35–36. (In Russ.).
  11. Chekanyshkin A.S. The Fundamentals of Sustainability and Durability of Protective Forest Plantations in the Conditions of the Central Black Earth Zone. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 2010, no. 3, pp. 29–30. (In Russ.).
  12. Bock M.D., Van Rees K.C.J. Mechanical Site Preparation Impacts on Soil Properties and Vegetation Communities in the Northwest Territories. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2002, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1381–1392. https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-067
  13. Chantal de M., Leinonen K., Ilvesniemi H., Westman C.J. Effects of Site Preparation on Soil Properties and on Morphology of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies Seedlings Sown at Different Dates. New Forests, 2004, vol. 27, pp. 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025042632491
  14. Coates K.D. Tree Recruitment in Gaps of Various Size, Clearcuts and Undisturbed Mixed Forest of Interior British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, vol. 155, iss. 1–3, pp. 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00574-6
  15. Concha J.Y., Alegre J.C., Pocomucha V. Determinación de las Reservas de Carbono en la Biomassa Aérea de Sistemas Agroforestales de Theobroma cacao L. en el Departamento de San Martín, Peru. Ecología Aplicada, 2007, vol. 6, no. 1–2, pp. 75–82. (In Span.). https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v6i1-2.343
  16. Jonard M., Misson L., Ponette Q. Long-Term Thinning Effects on the Forest Floor and the Foliar Nutrient Status of Norway Spruce Stands in the Belgian Ardennes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2006, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2684–2695. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-153
  17. Jose S. Agroforestry for Ecosystem Services and Environmental Benefits: An Overview. Agroforestry Systems, 2009, vol. 76, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7
  18. Korb J.E., Fulé P.Z., Gideon B. Different Restoration Thinning Treatments Affect Level of Soil Disturbance in Ponderosa Pine Forests of Northern Arizona, USA. Ecological Restoration, 2007, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 43–49. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.25.1.43
  19. Lacombe S., Bradley R.L., Hamel C., Beaulieu C. Do Tree-Based Intercropping Systems Increase the Diversity and Stability of Soil Microbial Communities? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2009, vol. 131, iss. 1–2, pp. 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.010
  20. Löf M., Dey D.C., Navarro R.M., Jacobs D.F. Mechanical Site Preparation for Forest Restoration. New Forests, 2012, vol. 43, pp. 825–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9332-x
  21. Peltola H., Kilpeläinen A., Sauvala K., Räisänen T., Ikonen V.-P. Effects of Early Thinning Regime and Tree Status on the Radial Growth and Wood Density of Scots Pine. Silva Fennica, 2007, vol. 41, no. 3, art. no. 285. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.285
  22. Reynolds P.E., Simpson J.A., Thevathasan N.V., Gordon A.M. Effects of Tree Competition on Corn and Soybean Photosynthesis, Growth, and Yield in a Temperate TreeBased Agroforestry Intercropping System in Southern Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering, 2007, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.024
  23. Weiskittel A.R., Kenefic L.S., Seymour R.S., Phillips L.M. Long-Term Effects of Precommercial Thinning on the Stem Dimensions, Form and Branch Characteristics of Red Spruce and Balsam Fir Crop Trees in Maine, USA. Silva Fennica, 2009, vol. 43, no. 3, art. no. 196. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.196


 

Make a Submission


ADP_cert_2024.png

Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal) was awarded the "Seal of Recognition for Active Data Provider of the Year 2024"

INDEXED IN: 

scopus.jpg

DOAJ_logo-colour.png

logotype.png

Логотип.png