Fraud Warning
We officially declare that NO MONEY from authors and members of the Editorial Board IS CHARGED! A big request to ignore spam e-mails.

Address: 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk 163002 Russian Federation. Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V.Lomonosov. Office 1425

Phone / Fax: (818-2) 21-61-18
E-mail: forest@narfu.ru
http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/en/

Archive

Effect of Thermal Modification of Wood on Strength and Elasticity Modulus in Static Bending

Версия для печати
Creative Commons License
These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

E.S. Sharapov, A.S. Toropov, A.S. Korolev

Complete text of the article:

Download article (pdf, 0.8MB )

UDС

[674.049.2+674.046.7]

DOI:

10.17238/issn0536-1036.2015.6.85

Annotation

The paper presents the experimental results of physical and mechanical properties of ther-mally modified timber of pine (P?nus sylv?stris), birch (B?tula P?ndula), oak (Qu?rcus R?-bur), aspen (Tilia europaea) and lime (P?pulus tr?mula). Wood samples’ heating was car-ried out in a saturated steam medium in a steam convection section and atmospheric pres-sure at maximum temperatures of 180 ?С, 200 ?С and 220 ?С and the duration of treatment at a peak value of 3 hours. The values of mass loss and the change in density when dry, specified moisture content, elasticity modulus and tensile strength at static bending were defined. The increase in mass loss was significant for all wood species. Maximum mass loss was determined for oak, lime and aspen wood specimens at average values of 17.8 %, 13.4 % and 16.5 % respectively, at a maximum temperature of 220 ?С. The density of thermally modified wood was reduced with increasing treatment temperature and reached the mini-mum values for wood of oak and aspen. Elasticity modulus at static bending increased for different species on average of 10…20 % for peak processing temperatures of 180 ?С and 200 ?С and subsequently reduced by increasing the temperature up to 220 ?С. The ultimate strength at static bending is increased for birch samples, treated at 180 ?С, on average of 12.5 %, pine – 14.5 % and lime – 9.2 %. With the rise of peak processing temperature up to 200 ?С the maximum reduction of ultimate strength of wood was observed in oak samples (on average 19.5 %). For birch and lime samples the decrease was insignificant – 3.5 % and 0.5 % in comparison with the unmodified samples. The rise of ultimate strength was ob-served for aspen samples of 23 % and 11.5 % for the 180 ?С and 200 ?С. The maximum decrease of the ultimate strength at static bending was marked for all species in the heat treatment temperature of 220 ?С, that was compared to unmodified samples for birch – 31.5 %, oak – 38.9 %, pine – 9.5 %, lime – 4.6 % and 11.5 % of aspen.

Authors

E.S. Sharapov, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor A.S. Toropov, Doctor of Engineerig Sciences, Professor A.S. Korolev, Postgraduate Student

Authors job

Volga State University of Technology, Lenin sq., 3, Yoshkar-Ola, Republic of Mari El, 424000, Russian Federation; е-mail: sharapoves@volgatech.net

Keywords

thermally modified timber, mass loss, density, elasticity modulus at static bend-ing, static modulus.

References

1. Vladimirova E.G. Tekhnologiya proizvodstva zagotovok iz termicheski modifitsi-rovannoy drevesiny: avtoref. dis… kand. tekn. nauk [Technology of Production of Hewn Blanks of Thermally Modified Wood: Cand. Eng. Sci. Diss. Abs.]. Moscow, 2012. 22 p. 2. Sharapov E.S., Karl-Christian Mahnert, Korolev A.S. Eksperimental'nye issledo-vaniya fiziko-mekhanicheskikh svoystv termicheski modifitsirovannoy drevesiny sosny [Experimental Research of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Pine Wood]. Moscow State Forest University Bulletin – Lesnoy vestnik, 2013, no. 2, pp. 90–96. 3. Arnold M. Effect of Moisture on the Bending Properties of Thermally Modified Beech and Spruce. Journal of Material Science, 2010, no. 45, pp. 669–680. 4. Bengtsson C., Jermer J., Brem F. Bending Strength of Heat-Treated Spruce and Pine Timber. 33rd annual meeting of the international research group on wood protection. Cardiff, Wales, 2002. 9 p. 5. Boonstra M.J. A Two-Stage Thermal Modification of Wood: Ph.D. Diss. Nancy, France, 2008. 297 p. 6. Gunduz G., Aydemir D., Karakas G. The Effects of Thermal Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Wild Pear (Pyrus elaeagnifolia Pall.) Wood and Changes in Phys-ical Properties. Materials and Design, 2009, no. 30, pp. 4391–4395. 7. Esteves B., Marques A.V., Domingos I., Pereira H. Influence of Steam Heating on the Properties of Pine (Pinus pinaster) and Eucalypt (Eucalyptus globulus) Wood. Wood Science and Technology, 2007, no. 3 (41), pp. 193–207. 8. Hill C.A.S. Wood Modification - Chemical, Thermal and Other Processes. Chich-ester, UK, 2006. 9. Kacikova D., Kacik F., Cabalova I., Durkovic J. Effects of Thermal Treatment on Chemical, Mechanical and Colour Traits in Norway Spruce Wood. Bioresource Technology, 2013, no. 144, pp. 669–674. 10. Kamperidou V., Barboutis I., Vasileiou V. Influence of Thermal Treatment on Mechanical Strength of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Wood. Wood research, 2014, no. 59 (2), pp. 373–378. 11. Kubojima Y., Okano T. & Ohta M. Bending Strength and Toughness of Heat-Treated Wood. Journal of Wood Science, 2000, no. 46, pp. 8–15. 12. Militz H., Altgen M. Processes and Properties of Thermally Modified Wood Manufactured in Europe. Deterioration and Protection of Sustainable Biomaterial, chapter 16. Ed. by T.P. Schultz, B. Goodell, D.D. Nicholas. Washington, 2014, pp. 269–285. 13. Ates S., Akyildiz M.H., ?zdemir H. Effects of Heat Treatment on Calabrian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Wood. BioResources, 2009, no. 4 (3), pp. 1032–1043. 14. ThermoWood 2003: ThermoWood® Handbook. Finnish ThermoWood Associa-tion. Helsinki, Finland. Available at: http://www.thermowood.fi. Received on May 11, 2015

Effect of Thermal Modification of Wood on Strength and Elasticity Modulus in Static Bending

 

INDEXED IN: