Адаптивное управление лесным хозяйством: на примере лесов скального дуба (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Leibl.) горы Озрен республики Сербской

УДК

630*624.9

DOI:

10.37482/0536-1036-2020-3-93-105

Аннотация

Адаптивное управление является основной концепцией управления лесными экосистемами в условиях постоянно изменяющего климата. В связи с этим, необходимо найти информацию и разработать основные теории, на которых основано адаптивное управление лесным хозяйством. Данная работа дает общее представление об адаптивном лесопользовании в контексте усыхания дубовых лесов и изменения климата в Республике Сербской (Босния и Герцеговина). Разведение лесов скального дуба, подверженных острому и хроническому усыханию, должно основываться на сохранении всех древостоев и способности к произврастанию совместно с черной сосной на неглубоких серпентинитовых и перидотитовых почвах. В статье рассматриваются возможности адаптивного управления лесами скального дуба и дается характеристика мероприятий по адаптивному управлению.

Сведения об авторах

З. Говедар¹, д-р с.-х. наук, проф.; ResearcherID: AAH-6314-2019,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-4113
М. Медаревич², д-р с.-х. наук, проф.
¹Факультет лесного хозяйства, Баня-Лукский университет, б-р воеводы Степе Степановича, д. 75А, г. Баня Лука, Республика Сербская, Босния и Герцеговина, 78000; e-mail: zoran.govedar@sf.unibl.org
²Факультет лесного хозяйства, Белградский университет, ул. Кнеза Вишеслава, д. 1, г. Белград, Сербия, 11000; e-mail: milan.medarevic@sfb.bg.ac.rs

Ключевые слова

адаптивное управление лесным хозяйством, усыхание леса, скальный дуб, изменение климата

Для цитирования

Govedar Z., Medarević M. Adaptive Forest Management: Case Study of Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Leibl.) Forests on Ozren Mountain of the Republic of Srpska // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2020. № 3. С. 93–105. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2020-3-93-105

Литература

1. Семёнов М.А., Высоцкий А.А., Пащенко В.И. Прогноз адаптивных приспособлений в лесном хозяйстве в связи с возможными климатическими изменениями // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2019. № 5. С. 57–69. [Semenov M.A., Vysotskiy A.A., Pashchenko V.I. Adaptation Scenarios in Forest Management Due to the Possible Climate Changes. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2019, no. 5, pp. 57–69]. DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2019.5.57, URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/fea/57_69.pdf
2. Ammer C., Bickel E., Kölling C. Converting Norway Spruce Stands with Beech – A Review on Arguments and Techniques. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 2008, vol. 125(1), pp. 3–26.
3. Baier P., Pennerstorfer J., Schopf A. PHENIPS – A Comprehensive Phenology Model of Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytinae) as a Tool for Hazard Rating of Bark Beetle Infestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, vol. 249, iss. 3, pp. 171–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.020
4. Bierbaum R.M., Holdren J.P., MacCracken M.C., Moss R.H., Raven P.H. Confronting Climate Change: Avoiding the Unmanageable and Managing the Unavoidable. Washington, DC, SIGMA Xi, 2007. 144 p.
5. Bolte A., Ammer Ch., Löf M., Nabuurs G-J., Schall P., Spathelf P. Adaptive Forest Management: A Prerequisite for Sustainable Forestry in the Face of Climate Change. Sustainable Forest Management in a Changing World. Ed. by P. Spathelf. Dordrecht, Springer, 2010, pp. 115–139. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3301-7_8
6. Bončina A. Urejanje gozdov [Forest Management]. Biotehniška Fakultata v Ljubljani, Slovenija, 2007.
7. Bormann B.T., Martin J.R., Wagner F.H., Wood G.W., Alegria J., Cunningham P.G. et al. Adaptive Management. Ecological Stewardship: A Common Reference for Ecosystem Management. Ed. by N.C. Johnson, A.J. Malk, W.T. Sexton, R. Szaro. Oxford, UK, Elsevier Science, 1999, pp. 505–534.
8. Ciais Ph., Reichstein M., Viovy N., Granier A., Ogée J., Allard V. et al. Europe-Wide Reduction in Primary Productivity Caused by the Heat and Drought in 2003. Nature, 2005, vol. 437, pp. 529–533. DOI: 10.1038/nature03972
9. Dobbertin M., DeVries W. Interactions between Climate Change and Forest Ecosystems. Forest Ecosystems in a Changing Environment: Identifying Future Monitoring and Research Needs. Report and Recommendations of the COST Strategic Workshop, March 11–13, 2008, Istanbul, Turkey. Ed. by R. Fischer. Germany, 2008, pp. 8–11.
10. Gunderson L.H., Holling C.S., Light S.S. Barriers Broken and Bridges Built: A Synthesis. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Ed. by L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Hollin, S.S. Light. New York, Columbia University Press, 1995, pp. 489–532.
11. Hansen J., Sato M., Ruedy R., Lo K., Lea D.W., Medina-Elizade M. Global Temperature Change. PNAS, 2006, vol. 103(39), pp. 14288–14293. DOI: 10.1073/ pnas.0606291103
12. Hlásny T., Turčáni M. Insect Pests as Climate Change Driven Disturbances in Forest Ecosystems. Bioclimatology and Natural Hazards. Ed. by K. Střelcová, C. Mátyás, A. Kleidon, M. Lapin, F. Matejka, M. Blaženec et al. Dordrecht, Springer, 2009, pp. 165–177. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8876-6_15
13. Holling C.S. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 1978. 377 p.
14. Innes J.L. Methods to Estimate Forest Health. Silva Fennica, 1993, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 145–157. DOI: 10.14214/sf.a15668
15. Irrgang S. Klimaänderung und Waldentwicklung in Sachsen – Auswirkungen auf die Forstwirtschaft. Forstarchiv 4, 2002, B. 73, S. 137–148.
16. Karadžić D. Klimatske promene i njihov potencijalni uticaj na prouzrokovače bolesti šumskog drveća i žbunja [Climate Change and Its Potential Impact on Pathogens of Forest Trees and Shrubs]. Šume i promena klime: Zbornik radova [Forests and Climate Change: Proceedings]. Ed. by R. Kadović, M. Medarević. Beograd, Univerzitet u Beogradu, 2007.
17. Kimmins J.P. Forest Ecology. New York, Macmillan, 1987. 531 p.
18. Knoke T., Ammer C., Stimm B., Mosandl R. Admixing Broadleaved to Coniferous Tree Species: A Review on Yield, Ecological Stability and Economics. European Journal of Forest Research, 2008, vol. 127, pp. 89–101. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-007-0186-2
19. Knoke T., Stimm B., Ammer C., Moog M. Mixed Forests Reconsidered: A Forest Economics Contribution on an Ecological Concept. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, vol. 213, iss. 1-3, pp. 102–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.043
20. Koskela J., Buc A., Teissier DuCros E. Climate Change and Forest Genetic Diversity: Implications for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. Rome, Biodiversity International, 2007. 111 p.
21. Krstić M., Stojanović Lj., Karadžić D. Uzgojne mere u funkciji saniranja stanja i zaštite od propadanja sušenjem ugroženih mladih kitnjakovih šuma [Silviculture in the Function of Rehabilitation and Protection against Decay by Drying Endangered Young Sessile Oak Forests]. Šumarstvo [Forestry], 1995, br. 1-2, str. 3–11.
22. Kusel J., Doak S.C., Carpenter S., Sturtevant V.E. The Role of the Public in Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Davis, University of California, 1996, pp. 611–624.
23. Lazarev V. Primena mera zaštite u oboljelim objektima [Application of Protective Measure Steps in Diseased Forest Objects]. Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci [Bulletin Faculty of Forestry, University of Banja Luka], 2006, br. 5, str. 37–63.
24. Lexer M.J., Hönninger K., Scheifinger H., Matulla C., Groll N., Kromp-Kolb H., Schadauer K., Starlinger F., Englisch M. The Sensitivity of Austrian Forests to Scenarios of Climatic Change: A Large-Scale Risk Assessment Based on a Modified Gap Model and Inventory Data. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, vol. 162, iss. 1, pp. 53–72. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00050-6
25. Lüdge W. Der Einfluß von Laubholzunterbau auf die Schädlingsdichte in den Kiefernbeständen der Schwetzinger Hardt. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung, 1971, vol. 142, pp. 173–178.
26. Lüpke B. Risikominderung durch Mischwälder und naturnaher Waldbau: Ein Spannungsfeld. Forstarchiv, 2004, vol. 75, pp. 43–50.
27. Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pörtner, H.O., Roberts D., Skea J., Shukla P.R. et al. Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva, World Meteorological Organization, 2018. 562 p.
28. Matić V. Prirast i prinos šuma [Forest Growth and Yield]. Sarajevo, Šumarski fakultet u Sarajevu, 1980. 311 p.
29. Medarević M., Banković S., Šljukić B., Sviličić A. Održivo upravljanje šumama – šumski biodiverzitet i promena klime [Sustainable Forest Management – Forest Biodiversity and Climate Change]. Šume i promena klime: Zbornik radova [Forests and Climate Change:  Proceedings]. Ed. by R. Kadović, M. Medarević. Beograd, Univerzitet u Beogradu, 2007, str. 125–152.
30. Milin Ž., Stojanović Lj., Krstić M. Predlog gazdinskih mera za saniranje posledica sušenja kitnjakovih šuma u severoistočnoj Srbiji [Proposal of Land Management Measures for the Rehabilitation of the Drying of Silt Forests in Northeastern Serbia]. Šumarstvo [Forestry], 1987, br. 5, str. 154–157.
31. Nabuurs G.J., Masera O. Forestry. Mitigation Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ed. by B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 541–584.
32. Netherer S. Modelling of Bark Beetle Development and of Site- and Stand-Related Predisposition to Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera; Scolyidae). A Contribution to Risk Assessment. PhD Thesis. Vienna, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), 2003.
33. Oszako T. Oak Declines in Europe’s Forest – History, Causes and Hypothesis. Recent Advances on Oak Health in Europe. Selected Papers from a Conference Held in Warsaw, November 22–24, 1999. Warsaw, Forest Research Institute, 2000, pp. 11–40.
34. Pretzsch H. Diversität und Produktivität von Wäldern. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung, 2003, vol. 174, pp. 88–98.
35. Schelhaas M.J., Nabuurs G.-J., Schuck A. Natural Disturbances in the European Forests in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Global Change Biology, 2003, vol. 9, iss. 11, pp. 1620–1633. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00684.x
36. Schlyter P., Stjernquist I., Bärring L., Jönsson A.M., Nilsson C. Assessment of the Impacts of Climate Change and Weather Extremes on Boreal Forests in Northern Europe, Focusing on Norway Spruce. Climate Research, 2006, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 75–84. DOI: 10.3354/cr031075
37. Seidl R., Thom D., Kautz M., Martin-Benito D., Peltoniemi M., Vacchiano G. et al. Forest Disturbances under Climate Change. Nature Climate Change, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 395–402. DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE3303
38. Spathelf P., Stanturf J., Kleine M., Jandl R., Chiatante D., Bolte A. Adaptive Measures: Integrating Adaptive Forest Management and Forest Landscape Restoration. Annals of Forest Science, 2018, vol. 75, art. 55. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-018-0736-4
39. Stojanović Lj., Karadžić D., Krstić M. Istraživanje uzroka sušenja kitnjakovih šuma na području regiona Zaječar i predlog uzgojnih mera za otklanjanje posledica i unapređenje stanja [Investigation of the Causes of Drying of Siltstones in the Region of Zajecar and Proposal of Breeding Measures for Elimination of Consequences and Improvement of the Condition]. Čovek i životna sredina [Man and the Environment], 1989, br. 2-3, str. 88–94.
40. Stojanović Lj., Krstić M. Problemi gajenja šuma sa aspekta sušenja hrasta kitnjaka [Problems of Silviculture from the Aspect of Drying Oak]. Simpozijum “Epidemijsko sušenje hrasta kitnjaka u severoistočnoj Srbiji”, 21–22.11.1991: zbornik radova [Symposium “Epidemic Drying of Sessile Oak in Northeastern Serbia”, 21–22.11.1991: Proceedings]. Donji Milanovac, 1992, str. 25–42.
41. Tainter F.H., Baker F.A. Principles of Forest Pathology. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1996. 832 p.
42. Third National Communication and Second Biennial Update Report on Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. UNFCCC, 2016. 256 p.
43. Walters C.J. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York, MacMillan, 1986. 374 p.
44. Walters C.J. Challenges in Adaptive Management of Riparian and Coastal Ecosystems. Conservation Ecology, 1997, vol. 1, no. 2, art. 1.
45. Walters C.J., Holling C.S. Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing. Ecology, 1990, vol. 71, iss. 6, pp. 2060–2068. DOI: 10.2307/1938620
46. Wermelinger B. Ecology and Management of the Spruce Bark Beetle Ips typographus – A Review of Recent Research. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, vol. 202, iss. 1–3, pp. 67–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.018
47. Yousefpour R., Didion M., Jacobsen J.B., Meilby H.M., Hengeveld G., Schelhaas M.J., Thorsen B.J. Modelling of Adaptation to Climate Change and Decision-Makers Behaviours for the Veluwe Forest Area in the Netherlands. Forest Policy and Economics, 2015, vol. 54, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.02.002

Ссылка на английскую версию:

Adaptive Forest Management: Case Study of Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Leibl.) Forests on Ozren Mountain of the Republic of Srpska

ADAPTIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY OF SESSILE OAK (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Leibl.) FORESTS ON OZREN MOUNTAIN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA

Z. Govedar¹, Doctor of Silviculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: AAH-6314-2019,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-4113
M. Medarević ², Doctor of Forest Management, Prof.
¹Faculty of Forestry, University of Banja Luka, Vojvode Stepe Stepanovića Blvd., 75A, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, 78000, Bosnia and Herzegovina; e-mail: zoran.govedar@sf.unibl.org
²Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava, 1, Belgrade, 11000, Republic of Serbia; e-mail: milan.medarevic@sfb.bg.ac.rs

Adaptive management is a basic concept of managing forest ecosystems in the face of increased risks such as climate change. Therefore, there is a need to develop key theories and information on which adaptive forest management is based on. This paper deals with the overview of basic information on adaptive forest management, with particular reference to its importance in relation to examples of sessile oak forests drying and climate change in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Silviculture of sessile oak forests affected by acute and chronic drying of the trees should be based on the preservation of the complete set of stands and miscibility with black pine on shallow serpentinite and peridotite soils. The paper deals with the possibilities of adaptive management of sessile oak forests and concludes with a description of adaptive management activities.
For citation: Govedar Z., Medarević M. Adaptive Forest Management: Case Study of Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Leibl.) Forests on Ozren Mountain of the Republic of Srpska. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2020, no. 3, pp. 93–105. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2020-3-93-105

Keywords: adaptive forest management, forest drying, sesile oak, climate change.

Поступила 02.11.19 / Received on November 2, 2019