![]() Почтовый адрес: САФУ, Редакция «Лесной журнал», наб. Северной Двины, д. 17, г. Архангельск, Россия, 163002, ауд. 1425
Тел.: +7 (8182) 21-61-18 о журнале |
О.Н. Тюкавина Рубрика: Лесное хозяйство Скачать статью (pdf, 0.4MB )УДК674.032.475.4DOI:10.17238/issn0536-1036.2015.4.61АннотацияАкустическая томография основана на измерениях времени прохождения звуковых импульсов. Скорость прохождения звуковых импульсов позволяет получить информацию о состоянии древесины. Акустическая томография может успешно применяться для оценки не только состояния дерева, но и качества древесины. Звуковая волна распространяется быстрее в древесине с большей плотностью.
Сведения об авторах
Ключевые словаакустическая томография, качество древесины, сосна, скорость прохождения звуковых импульсовЛитература
Ссылка на английскую версию:About Interpretation Methods of Acoustic Tomography Results of Pine WoodUDC 674.032.475.4
About Interpretation Methods of Acoustic Tomography Results of Pine Wood
O.N. Tyukavina, Candidate of Agriculture, Associate Professor Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russia; e-mail: tyukavina@agtu.ru
Acoustic tomography is based on measurements of the propagation time of sound impulses. Velocity of sound impulses characterizes the state of the wood. Acoustic tomography is used for wood assessment and to determine the quality of the wood. Because the sound wave propagates more rapid in high density wood. The main objective of this work was to develop interpretation methods of the Arbotom results to estimate the quality of the wood. The object of research is pine, because it is less amenable to fungal diseases than other species of trees and it is a valuable specie. Acoustic tomography was carried with the Arbotom machine at tree height 130 cm above ground. From 6 to 12 sensors was used, depended on the diameter of the tree. Healthy wood quality was evaluated on the average velocity of sound transmission between sensors. In order to reduce the influence of external damage of stem (mechanical damage, winterkilling cracks) on the average velocity of sound transmission in wood, data from neighboring sensors was excluded. Different options, proposed by the software, were analyzed while result processing. The option «Use better mean value» overstates of the velocity of sound in 2 -D image, so it was we deactivated. It is necessary to activate automatic color calibration in 2 -D image for clearer picture of changes in the structure of wood in the cross-section. Then the scale will not be fixed ("floating"), that shows minimum and maximum value, found in the cross-section of wood. In this case, the red color indicates on change in the wood structure but it does not indicate decay. Therefore, option activation by the software must be considered and certain options must be selected in interpreting the results of acoustic tomography, collected by Arbotom. Methods of interpreting of the acoustic tomography results must be indicated in researches to exclude differences in results, received other researchers.
Keywords: acoustic tomography, wood quality, pine, velocity of sound pulses
REFERENCES
1. Mel'nichuk I.A., Yassin M.Y.S., Cherdantsev O.A. Diagnostika vnutrennego sostoyaniya derev'ev Tilia Cordata Mill. s ispol'zovaniem kompleksa apparatury akusticheskoy ul'trazvukovoy tomografii «Arbotom» [Diagnosis of Internal State of Trees Tilia Cordata Mill. with Using Complex of Acoustic Equipment of Ultrasonic Tomography «Arbotom»]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Agronomiya i zhivotnovodstvo, 2012, no. 55, pp. 25–32. 2. Silkin P.P., Ekimova N.V. Teoreticheskaya otsenka vliyaniya soderzhaniya kal'tsiya v kletochnykh stenkakh godichnykh kolets khvoynykh na rezul'taty rentgenovskoy densitometrii [Theoretical Assessment of Effect of Calcium Content in the Cell Walls of Annual Rings of Coniferous Species on the x-ray Densitometry Results]. Lesnoy zhurnal, 2012,
3. Bucur V. Nondestructive characterization and imaging of wood. Springer, Berlin, 2003, pp. 246–252. 4. Catena A. Thermography reveals hidden tree decay. 2003, pp. 27–42. 5. Deflorio G. Wood decay dynamics in the sapwood of trees – in vitro and in vivo studies on the role of the wood substrate in decay development. Cuvillier, Goettingen, 2006, pp. 158–164. 6. Deflorio G., Fink S. Detection of incipient decay in tree stems with sonic tomography after wounding and fungal inoculation. Wood Science Technology, 2008, no. 42, pp. 117–132. 7. Liang, S., Fu, F. Relationship analysis between tomograms and hardness maps in determining internal defects in Euphrates poplar. Wood Research, 2012, no. 57 (2), pp. 221–230. 8. Lonsdale D. Principles of tree hazard assessment and management. London, 1999, pp. 38–46. 9. Luo J., Yang X. Study on the correlation between mechanical characteristics and nondestructive testing of stress wave in larch logs. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, no. 433–440, pp. 2135–2141. 10. Rinn F. Technische Grundlagen der Impuls-Tomographie. Baumzeitung, 2003, 8, pp. 29–31. 11. Rust S., Gocke L. PICUS sonic tomograph – a new device for nondestructive timber testing. In: Backhaus G.F., Balder H., Idczak E. (Eds.), International Symposium on Plant Health in Urban Horticulture, Braunschweig, Germany, 2000, pp. 67–74. 12. Schwarze FWMR, Fink S. Ermittlung der Holzzersetzung am lebenden Baum. Neue Landshaft 39, 1994, pp. 182–193. 13. Shigo Al. Microorganisms isolated from wounds inflicted on red maple, paper birch, American beech, and red oak in winter, summer and autumn. Phytopathol, 1976,
14. Wang L., Xu H., Zhou C., Li L., Yang X. Effect of sensor quantity on measurement accuracy of log inner defects by using stress wave. Journal of Forestry Research, 2007, N 18 (3), pp. 221–225. 15. Yang X.a , Luo J. Study on stress wave non-destructive testing of bending resistance characteristics of logs. World Automation Congress Proceedings, N 6321170, 2012, pp. 496–502. Received on April 23, 2014 |
Электронная подача статей
ИНДЕКСИРУЕТСЯ В:
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![](/img/transparent.gif)